Thesis (Ph. M.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1946. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1946. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaf [38]).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1965. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliography.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1973. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (B.Sc)--University of Hong Kong, 2002. / "A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science (Speech and Hearing Sciences), The University of Hong Kong, May 10, 2002." Also available in print.

Thesis (B.Sc)--University of Hong Kong, 1996. / "A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science (Speech and Hearing Sciences), The University of Hong Kong, April 29, 1996." Also available in print.

Thesis (Th. M.)--Dallas Theological Seminary, 1983. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [51]-54).

<p> Several studies across various languages have shown that monolingual listeners perceive significant differences between the speech of monolinguals and bilinguals. However, these differences may not always affect the phoneme category as identified by the listener or the speaker; differences may often be found between tokens corresponding to unique phonological categories and, as such, be more easily detectable through acoustic analysis. We hypothesized that unshared English vowels produced by young Spanish-English bilinguals would have measurably different formant values and duration than the same vowels produced by young English monolinguals because of Spanish influence on English phonology. We did not find significant differences in formant values between the two groups, but we found that SpanishEnglish bilinguals produced certain vowels with longer duration than English monolinguals. Our findings add to the ever-growing body of literature on bilingual language acquisition and the perception of accentedness.</p><p>

The purpose of this project was to differentially examine the specificity of two acoustic measures, relative fundamental frequency (RFF) and the cepstral/spectral index of dysphonia (CSID), to listener perceptions of voice quality across four dimensions: breathiness, roughness, strain/vocal effort, and overall severity. An auditory perceptual experiment was conducted to estimate listener perception of said dimensions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between RFF, CSID, and the perceptual ratings of voice quality was calculated in order to comment on the relationship between calculations of RFF and CSID and the current "gold standard" of listener perception. The hypothesis for this project was that measures of RFF would have a strong negative correlation with listener perception of strain/vocal effort, and that measures of CSID would have a strong positive correlation with listener perception of overall severity and breathiness. An unexpected result with a significant impact was found to be that listeners' ratings of the four voice qualities were highly correlated with one another. Unfortunately, the poorly differentiated perceptual ratings significantly impact the validity of this project in addition to hindering any reliability of its results. Thus overall, the correlations between measures of RFF, CSID, and distinct qualities of listener perception are rendered uninterpretable. Methodological considerations and future directions are henceforth reported.