1 |
Status, Relatively Speaking: Extending the Organizational Focus on Status and Status InequalityChristie, AMY 25 November 2008 (has links)
This dissertation explores the role of status and status hierarchies in organizations, with considerable attention devoted to status-based health disparities. Manuscript 1 extends the current work stress literature by proposing a dynamic model relating individual-level socio-economic status (SES) to workplace stressors, psychological resources, and health. The model is tested using three-wave longitudinal data gathered across four years from employed Canadians. The results show an escalating relationship between personal control and work stressors, which indirectly links SES to physical health outcomes.
The second study of the dissertation elaborates on the definition of status, acknowledging and embracing its relational nature. In doing so, Manuscript 2 advances Manuscript 1 in numerous ways: (1) it conceptualizes status at the team-level of analysis by introducing the construct of status inequality, or the degree to which status is dispersed within teams; (2) it shifts focus from macro indicators of SES to organizational indicators of status within small, face-to-face teams, asking whether status in these teams influences health; (3) it explores performance-related outcomes in addition to health outcomes at both the individual- and team-level of analysis. Archival data from National Basketball Association players and teams were obtained to test the hypotheses set forth in Manuscript 2. The results of the study suggest that both status and status inequality (and their interaction) are related to the focal individual- and team-level outcomes.
The final chapter comprising this dissertation resides largely at the team-level of analysis. Manuscript 3 is a conceptual exploration into the mechanisms that relate status inequality to team-level health and performance, proposing that status inequality influences social cognition, from which emerges a team’s social structure. Furthermore, it places boundary conditions on the effects of status inequality by arguing that shared cultural values will determine how status inequality is perceived and enacted. The dissertation closes with a general discussion of the studies and recommendations for future research. / Thesis (Ph.D, Management) -- Queen's University, 2008-11-25 11:12:46.526
|
2 |
The effectiveness of services offered by an intervention program for youth status offendersHamm, Emily Rose Henry, Smith, Thomas A. (Thomas Alton), January 2005 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis(M.S.)--Auburn University, 2005. / Abstract. Vita. Includes bibliographic references (p.48-55).
|
3 |
Age, SES, and health old topic, new perspective (a longitudinal perspective about the relationship between SES and health) /Wu, Wanfu, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
4 |
Modelling the links between socioeconomic status and health in Australia : a dynamic microsimulation approach /Walker, Agnes Emilia. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Australian National University, 2005.
|
5 |
Three Studies on Counterintuitive Effects of Organizational StatusByrne, ALYSON 13 September 2013 (has links)
This dissertation examines some counterintuitive effects associated with having high status. Whereas much literature focuses on benefits associated with holding high status, in this dissertation, I highlight some negative outcomes that can come from having status. Study 1 examines marital costs that can emerge when women hold high job status relative to their spouses. I propose a conditional process model such that when women experience job status leakage, a construct referring to contempt that women feel towards their husbands’ lower job status, this will positively predict marital instability, mediated through decreased relationship satisfaction. The model is tested in a cross-sectional field study on women in high job status positions, and the model is supported.
The second study of this dissertation examines potential costs when in high status positions to CEOs longevity. I argue that despite the benefits accrued at the highest level of organizational status; CEOs will compare their status to other CEOs, which influences their longevity. Using a retrospective cohort analysis on award winners from Financial Word Magazine’s “CEO of the Year” contest, I test four competing models, which suggest that the ways CEOs interpret their status can predict longevity. The results of this study are largely unsupported, though post-hoc analyses and theorizing suggest that status maintenance comes at a cost to longevity for this group of CEOs.
In the third study of this dissertation, I examine the relational costs associated with holding high status. Given the relational nature of status, for some individuals to have high status, there must be lower status referents. The emotions and behaviors of those lower status others are the focus of the third study. I propose that in the presence of status differences, lower status individuals will feel envious of others’ higher status positions, and I quantify how much status dispersion must be present in order for envy to be triggered. I also suggest that when individuals are envious of others’ status positions, they are more likely to ostracize high status targets and perceive themselves as ostracized in social interactions. The results suggest that there is a curvilinear relationship between status dispersion and envy, where only minimal status differences need be present in order for envy to emerge, and envy then predicts feeling ostracized in social situations.
The dissertation closes with a general discussion of the studies, and suggests areas for future research. / Thesis (Ph.D, Management) -- Queen's University, 2013-09-13 14:12:57.107
|
6 |
An application of construct validationWasson, Kay William January 2010 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
7 |
Commodifying Fido: pets as status symbolsPlemons, April 15 May 2009 (has links)
How are pets being used as status symbols to display social position and
wealth? This paper seeks to theoretically examine pet owners and their use of
animals to convey a message of social status, position and wealth. This will be
done through an application of theoretical constructs by Veblen, Marx, and
Bourdieu and applications to concepts of consumerism, status, commodities and
distinction. While the human-animal relationship has been investigated in terms
of the human benefits of physical and mental health, stress reduction, child
surrogacy, loneliness reduction and more, there have been fewer investigations
of pets as social status symbols.
This thesis creates a more inclusive theoretical approach to commodities
being used as status symbols. After a historical look at how the function of pets
has evolved in relation to humans, the more inclusive theory is applied to real
world examples of pets in modern affluent societies such as pet luxury items,
designer breeds, market segmentation, and mass availability of those products.
|
8 |
Path-analytic models of status attainment and informant-reported dataMeidam, Miles Thomas, January 1976 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1976. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
9 |
A new look at status inconsistencyJanssen, Susan G. January 1978 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 64-67).
|
10 |
A social psychological model of status attainment processesKisdarjono. January 1982 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1982. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 93-97).
|
Page generated in 0.0605 seconds