Trade deficit, financial deficit, and current account deficit of the United States have all been problems deeply concerned by economists and politicians in recent decades. Since the third season of 2000, a recession of the United States and the whole world has gradually started to appear. In addition, as a result of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the war in Iraq the stock market has begun to decline significantly. In order to promote the recovery of its economy, the federal government determines to adopt the expanded financial policy which will most likely in the end cause its financial deficit more serious. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors that influence the current account deficit of the United States. Because the study considers foreign variables that related researches ignore, we choose five variables as follows: regional output differential, regional interest rate differential, terms of trade, regional real effective exchange rate, and current account. Therefore, we adopt the Unit Root Test, the Granger Causality Test, the Co-integrating Test, and SVAR (Structural Vector Autoregressive) model to run RATS and E-views. It is the finding of empirical result that the United States government considers terms of trade and current account that can't be quantized of the first importance rather than the exchange rate factor that general research is thought. This is one of the contributions of the study.

This paper examines the effects of monetary policy on macroeconomic variables in Botswana as a developing small macro-economy using the Markov-switching structural vector autoregressive (MS-SVAR) framework, utilising time-series data from 1994: Q1 to 2019: Q4. The study makes use of bank rate (interest rate), inflation and output gap. The first model is a structural vector autoregressive (VAR) model that takes the form employed by Rudebusch and Svensson (1999), whilst the second one makes use of the same structure but includes Markov switching in the policy rule (i.e., Markov switching SVAR). Regime-switching models can effectively describe the data generating process when considering both in-sample and out of sample evaluations compared to the linear models, which submerge the structural changes that have occurred in the economy over the years. The results from the SVAR shows that monetary policy has a symmetric impact on the output gap and inflation. Therefore, it can be noted that non-linearities in the structural model do not necessarily imply asymmetric effects of shocks. Furthermore, the MS-SVAR shows that the Central Bank of Botswana responds differently to policy shocks in different regimes. This underscores the importance of regime-switching features in providing a more accurate description of the economy.