This dissertation considers the incommensurable interests of people, fossil capital, federal energy politics, and place in Northern Canada during the 1970s. By the late 1960s, the insatiable North American appetite for fossil fuels had turned its attention toward the Arctic region. After the discovery of rich deposits in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, in 1968, largescale energy projects were proposed to access and exploit these Arctic natural resources. Canada participated in this northern oil rush; an exploration of oil and gas in the Arctic regions was accelerated in the early 1970s. The next challenge involved transporting the oil and gas to southern markets. In 1974, the Canadian federal government initiated the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry to investigate the social, environmental, and economic effects of the pipeline routes proposed by a consortium of American and Canadian oil companies through the Mackenzie River Valley in the Northwest Territories where it would connect with existing pipeline infrastructure in northern Alberta. The Inquiry’s report recommended against immediate construction, encouraging instead a ten-year moratorium. Inquiry commissioner Thomas Berger’s report rationalized the delay to make time for settling Indigenous land claims in the region and for taking conservation measures to protect some key areas in the Mackenzie River Valley. In this dissertation, I examine how the discussion around pipeline construction shaped the meaning of the North, self-determination, and cultural recognition. In this dissertation, I particularly focus on how Indigenous peoples asserted their claims by rejecting state-driven policies and the interests of fossil-fuel capitalism in the North. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Through the close reading of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry hearings, I examine how the discussion around energy development shaped the 1970s’ contentious Canadian politics of nation and North. Central to this debate, I focus on how Indigenous peoples asserted their land claims by challenging and refusing the settler state policies and the interests of fossil-fuel capitalism in the western Northwest Territories in the 1970s. By using the Inquiry process, northern Indigenous peoples challenged the idea that the state had a legitimate authority to decide and control the future or destiny of a territory or peoples in its defined borders.

L’étude présentée dans ce mémoire concerne ce qui amène les jeunes adultes (18-25 ans) à afficher certains éléments et pas d’autres, sur Facebook, en relation avec leur conception personnelle de la vie privée. J’aborde ce processus en mobilisant les notions de présentation de soi, de relations en public et, plus particulièrement, de territoires du moi élaborées par le sociologue Erving Goffman (1973). Les territoires du moi sont ici perçus comme ce qui appartient à l’individu de manière privée et qu’il souhaite protéger. Ces notions de la pensée de Goffman sont pour moi interdépendantes puisque les territoires du moi d’une personne sont influencés à la fois par le rôle que la personne tient ainsi que par les normes et les règles encadrant l'interaction. Cette étude a été réalisée auprès de huit jeunes adultes âgés entre 18 et 25 ans. Une entrevue individuelle a été faite avec chacun d’entre eux. Lors de celle-ci, les participants avaient à présenter leur compte Facebook. Je les invitais, par exemple, à me raconter ce qui les motivait à afficher certaines choses, qui sont les personnes qui peuvent voir ces choses et, à l’inverse, ce qui n’a pas sa place sur la page Facebook et qui sont les personnes qui ne peuvent pas voir certaines publications. Suite à ce terrain, les analyses mettent en lumière sept dimensions s’inscrivant dans la pensée de Goffman qui dessinent la protection de ce que l’on pourrait nommer la vie privée. Il y a Se voir à travers le regard de l’autre et s’en inquiéter, Projeter une image de soi positive, Les amis Facebook : jamais nous n’avons eu autant d’amis, Flirt, relation de couple et cœur brisé : les relations amoureuses et Facebook, Avoir plusieurs rôles sur une même plateforme : la famille n’a souvent pas sa place, Gérer les paramètres de Facebook n’est pas si simple et Évolution de l’usage de Facebook : une question d’âge et un apprentissage. La plupart d’entre elles ont, pour ligne directrice, le regard de l’autre puisque l’inquiétude vis-à-vis celui-ci vient très souvent nuancer le choix de publications des usagés. / The research presented in this thesis explores what leads young adults (18-25) to display some elements and not others on Facebook in accordance with their personal conception of privacy. I approach this question using the concepts of self-presentation, public behavior and more particularly the territories of the self as developed by sociologist Erving Goffman (1973).The territories of the self are defined here as that which belongs to the individual privately and which he or she seeks to protect. Goffman’s notions seem to me to be interdependent since the territories of the self of a person are influenced both by the individual’s role and by the norms and rules governing the interaction. This study was conducted with eight young adults between the ages of 18 and 25. An in-depth interview was performed with each of them. During these interviews, the participants presented and explained their Facebook accounts. They were encouraged to explain why they choose to display certain things, who has access to their posts and, on the contrary, what does not belong on their Facebook page and who is not authorized to see some of their publications. Following this field study, the analysis highlights seven dimensions in relation to Goffman’s thoughts around the protection of what one might call privacy. We separate them as follows: Seeing through the eyes of the other and feeling concerned, Projecting a positive self-image, Facebook friends: we have never had so many friends, Courtship, couples’ relationship and broken hearts: romantic relationships and Facebook, Playing multiple roles on a single platform: or where the family does not have its place, Managing Facebook settings is not that simple and The evolution of Facebook usage: a question of age and a learning process. Most of them have as a common thread the gaze of the other since the general concern vis-à-vis the latter often influences the choices of the user’s publications.