Spelling suggestions: "subject:"textbased discussion"" "subject:"text.based discussion""
1 |
Incidental Noticing and EFL Students’ Subsequent Second Language Learning in Synchronous Text-based Discussion: An Investigation of Both NES-NNES and NNES-NNES DyadsKung, Wan-Tsai 2009 August 1900 (has links)
This dissertation investigated Taiwanese English as Foreign Language (EFL)
learners' incidental noticing and their subsequent language learning in relation to learner
proficiency level and dyadic type in a text-based computer-mediated communication
(CMC) environment. Sixty participants were included to form 30 dyads. At random,
eight low-intermediate and eight advanced nonnative English speakers (NNESs) were
paired with 16 native English speakers (NESs) to form 16 NES-NNES dyads; another 14
advanced NNESs and 14 low-intermediate NNESs were paired to form 14 mixedproficiency
NNES-NNES dyads.
The results revealed that the synchronous computer-mediated communication
(SCMC) medium could, in general, enhance the occurrence of learners' incidental
noticing and their subsequent second language (L2) learning regardless of learners'
proficiency levels and dyadic types. No significant differences were found in the amount
of the language-related episodes (LREs) produced by the NES-NNES dyads when compared to the NNES-NNES dyads. With regard to the number of LREs generated by
the learners of different proficiency levels, the results showed that: (1) in the NESNNES
dyads, no significant difference was found between the low-intermediate and
advanced learners, and (2) in the NNES-NNES dyads, the low-intermediate learners
produced a significantly greater number of LREs than their advanced interlocutors. In
terms of the effect of interlocutors' proficiency levels on the number of LREs produced
by the learners, the results revealed that: (1) the low-intermediate learners in the NESNNES
dyads produced a significantly greater number of LREs than the low-intermediate
learners in the NNES-NNES dyads, and (2) the advanced learners in the NES-NNES
dyads also produced a significantly greater number of LREs than the advanced learners
in the NNES-NNES dyads.
With respect to the learners' performance on both posttests, the results of chi-square
analyses showed that: (1) no significant differences were found both within and across
the two dyadic types, and (2) no significant differences were found between learners of
different proficiency levels within and across both NES-NNS and NNES-NNES dyads.
Logistic regression analyses revealed that five LRE characteristics (type, source,
complexity, proficiency, and successful uptake) in the NES-NNES dyads and three LRE
characteristics (proficiency, timing and successful uptake) in the NNES-NNES dyads
were shown to be significant predictor variables of the learners' subsequent L2 learning.
Successful uptake was the most prevalent predictor variable of the learners' subsequent
L2 learning across the two dyadic types. Besides, proficiency appeared to be the second
prevalent variable but played a different role in these two dyadic types. Considering the language aspects focused in the LREs, negotiations on the linguistic features of grammar,
vocabulary, and spelling were much more prevalent than the pragmatic aspects of
language.
|
Page generated in 0.0831 seconds