Spelling suggestions: "subject:"then science off law"" "subject:"then science oof law""
41 |
Prohibited areas in international air lawRitchie, Jean H. January 1969 (has links)
No description available.
|
42 |
The dynamics of the Arab unity movement, 1945/1963 /Sharara-Hobbs, Norma E. January 1977 (has links)
No description available.
|
43 |
New space technology : regulatory challenges for the International Telecommunication UnionPatterson, Angus, 1974- January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
44 |
The European union's approach towards e-commerce /Mirica, Andreea. January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
45 |
Clausewitz in space: rethinking Realism in the 21st centuryWechsler, William Alfred January 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
46 |
Self-fulfilling prophecies: the government's role in generating support for ethnic terroristsCox, Amy S January 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
47 |
Israeli warring foreign policy and the writing of identity: the case of Operation Cast LeadPlasse-Couture, Francois-Xavier January 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
48 |
Deliberating science juries, scientific evidence and commonsense justice /Farley, Erin Jennifer. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Delaware, 2006. / Principal faculty advisor: Valerie P. Hans, Dept. of Criminal Justice. Includes bibliographical references.
|
49 |
Ethnicity, rivalry and territory an interactive and multi-level approach to international conflict /Butcher, Charity. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, Dept. of Political Science, 2009. / Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on Feb. 10, 2010). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: . Adviser: William Thompson.
|
50 |
State partisan interventions in international conflictsCorbetta, Renato January 2004 (has links)
The dissertation explores the phenomenon of joining behavior--non-neutral interventions by third party states in interstate conflicts. The opportunity and willingness theoretical framework (Most and Starr 1989) is used to develop a model of third party intervention that integrates simultaneously intervention decision, alignment choices, and selection of specific intervention techniques. Within the general model of third party intervention, two models of third party's preference formation--a rational choice and a homophily-based model--are compared. The models are empirically tested with newly collected data on interventions in interstate disputes for the 1946-2001 period. The data expand current knowledge on third states' activities by including information on non-military--diplomatic and economic--intervention techniques. Opportunity factors are found to predict effectively third parties' intervention; while willingness shapes alignment decisions and selection of intervention techniques. Strategic and homophily-based similarities with the state supported in a conflict and dissimilarities with the state being antagonized are found to matter equally in shaping third parties' decisions. Methodologically, this study addresses a variety of selection issues present in current research on joining behavior. Theoretically, it speaks to a variety of international relations issues, such as balance-of-power and bandwagoning, spatial diffusion of conflict, foreign policy substitutability and decision-making, and alliance formation and reliability.
|
Page generated in 0.0926 seconds