Thesis (D. Min.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 2002. / Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 157-166).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Covenant Theological Seminary, 2006. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-152).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Dallas Theological Seminary, 2006. / Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-123).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 1993. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 102-108).

In der Arbeit geht es um die Geschichte der protestantischen theologischen Ausbildung in Tanganyika, dem Festlandteil des späteren Tansania. Es ist hauptsachlich ein Teil der Geschichte der protestantischen Missionen aus Deutschland und den USA, die diese in Tanganyika geschrieben haben. Allerdings wäre die theologische Geschichte ohne das Wirken der Einheimischen nicht denkbar. Ihr Wirken war aber - bedingt durch deren Status - mehr im Hintergrund. Begonnen hat die theologische Ausbildung erst zwischen den beiden Weltkriegen. Eine konstante Ausbildung an einem Ort gibt es erst seit der Gründung der Schule in Makumira in den fünfziger Jahren. Die ersten Forderungen nach einer theologischen Ausbildung gab es allerdings bereits vor dem ersten Weltkrieg. Bedingt durch den ersten Weltkrieg und die Repatriierung der Deutschen kam es im Bereich der Bethel Mission zu Notordinierungen. Eine weitere Folge war, dass durch eine Vereinbarung zwischen der Leipziger Mission und der Augustana Lutheran Mission, diese treuhänderisch die Leipziger Gebiete übernahm. Dadurch kam diese Mission nach Tanganyika. Nach der Rückkehr blieben die Amerikaner dort. Wiederum durch die Folgen des 1. Weltkrieges konnten die Deutschen nicht mehr in der Weise missionieren, wie sie dies fruher getan hatten. Man erkannte schnell, dass man die Strategie andern musste. Die Betheler Mission sandte sogar einen Missionar aus, der sich um den Aufbau einer theologischen Ausbildung kummern sollte. Doch kam es dazu zunachst nicht. Wie bei vielen weiteren Verzporgerungen war hier die Arbeitsbelastung und der chronische Geldmangel der Mission ursachlich. Dies gait fur alle deutschen Missionen. Doch waren sie zum Handeln gezwungen, da sie durch den Staat Vorgaben im Bereich der Schule und der Lehrerausbildung hatten. Diese Vorgaben bewirkten, dass man auch das Niveau der Pastoren heben musste. Die Betheler Mission hat noch in den zwanziger Jahren einen Pastor nach einer kurzen Schulung ordiniert. Danach setzten sich die Krafte durch, die eine Ordinierung Einheimischer ablehnten. Durch das Wachstum der Kirche und dem Drangen der (einheimischen) Altesten wurden dann immer wieder von den jeweiligen Missionen Versuche unternommen, eine Ausbildung aufzubauen. Den ersten wirklichen Kursus boten die Leipziger 1933/34. Auch die anderen Missionen mussten aufgrund der Notwendigkeit eine Ausbildung und Ordination anbieten. Teilweise wurde ohne Ausbildung ordiniert. All dies war nicht befriedigend und durch den Devisenmangel immer eine vorubergehende Erscheinung. 1935 machte die Betheler Missionsgesellschaft einen Vorstoss und regte konkret den schon zuvor geausserten, aber nie umgesetzten Gedanken einer gemeinsamen Ausbildung erneut an. Mit diesem Vorstoss setzte sich der Gedanke fest und wurde verhandelt. Leider spielte bei aller Devisenknappheit auch noch Konfessionalismus eine Rolle, so dass die Grundung dieser gemeinsamen Schule beinahe gescheitert ware. Man konnte sich dann doch noch einigen und beschloss die Grundung dieser Schule dem noch zu grundenden Missionskirchenbund (MKB) zu uberlassen. Durch Verzogerungen bei der Planung und dem Aufbau der gemeinsamen Hirtenschule kam es wiederum zu Notausbildungen und Notordinationen im Bereich der Missionen. Zum einen waren nicht die Mittel vorhanden, die Gebaude aufzubauen, zum anderen waren die personellen Moglichkeiten begrenzt. Mit hinein spielte auch hier wieder Kirchenpolitik, dass namlich eine Person nicht Leiter sein konnte, weil sie eine nicht konfessionsgebundene Schule wollte. Um sich dann durchz setzen, stellten die Leipziger die anderen Missionen vor vollendete Tatsachen und planten die gemeinsame Schule in ihrem Gebiet unter der Leitung eines ihrer Missionare. Notwendige Heimataufenthalte und der Tod eines fur die Leitung der Schule vorgesehenen Missionars bewirkten weitere Verzogerungen. Nachdem dann im Lauf der Zeit die notwendigen Gebaude erstellt worden waren und das Lehrerkollegium aus den verschiedenen Missionen so zusammengestellt worden war, dass alle dies akzeptieren konnten, wurde die Eroffnung auf den Oktober 1939 festgesetzt. Doch durch den Beginn des 2. Weltkrieges und den damit verbundenen Auswirkungen auf Tanganyika war die Eroffnung nicht mehr moglich. Die Ausgustana Lutheran Mission ubernahm dann die Arbeitsgebiete der Deutschen. Zu Beginn arbeiteten die Deutschen zwar noch an ihren Platzen, wurden aber dann doch im Laufe der Zeit interniert. Obwohl der Leiter des MKB, Paul Rother, sich noch leidenschaftlich und mit grossr Opferbereitschaft fur die Eroffnung der Schule einsetzte, lehnte die Mission vorlaufig ab. Nachdem auch Paul Rother und weitere Deutsche interniert waren und das Ende des Krieges nicht absehbar war, setzte sich die Einsicht bei den Leitern der Augustana Lutheran Mission durch, dass man eine Schule benotigt, um die Missionare zu entlasten und um die Bedurfnisse der Gemeinden befriedigen zu konnen. Daher betraute man Dr. Reusch mit einem Lehrauftrag. So wurde wahrend des Krieges der erste Kursus unter der Leitung der Amerikaner durchgefuhrt. Auch wahrend des Krieges kam es zu Notordinationen, teilweise verbunden mit kurzen Kursen. / This work is about the history of the protestant theological education in Tanganyika, the continental part of the later Tanzania. It is part of the history of the protestant missions from Germany and USA which they have written in Tanganyika. The history of the theological education wouldn't be conceivable without the work of the residents. But their work was - because of their status - more in the background. Theological education began only between the two world wars. A constant education at one place came only in the fifties with the foundation of the school in Makumira, But the first demand for theological education was before the 1st world war. Conditional on the 1st world war and the repatriation of the Germans the Bethel Mission ordained residents because of the necessity. As a further result the Augustana Lutheran Mission came to Tanganyika because of an agreement with the Leipzig Mission. Augustana hold the areas of the Leipzig Mission in trust. After the Germans came back the Americans didn't leave Tanganyika. Again as a result of the 1st world war the Germans couldn't work anymore as they did before. They soon recognized that they had to change the strategy. The Bethel Mission even sent a missionary to Tanganyika for the reason to set up theological education. But at first it didn't got around to it. As the further delays the work-load and the chronic lack of money have been the causality. This applied to all German missions. But the missions had to handle because of the preconditions of the State in the sector of schooling and teachers education. These preconditions have been a cause why they had to lift up the standard of the pastors, too. The Bethel Mission then ordained as late as the twenties a pastor after a short education. Afterwards those people who refused ordination prevailed against the others. But because of the growth of the church and the urge of the (resident) elders to ordain pastors the several missions tried to keep building theological education. The first real course has been offered by the Leipzig Mission in 1933/34. The other Missions had because of the strong need to offer theological education and ordination, too. Sometimes they ordained without education. This hasn't been satisfactory and because of the lack of money the education was temporary. 1935 the Bethel Mission did a new advance and encouraged concrete the thinking about the idea of a common theological education. This idea has been uttered in the past but hasn't been put into action. With this advance the idea was fix in the minds and negotiated about. Unfortunately the denominationalism came to the lack of money. Therefore the founding of the common school nearly couldn't managed. But the Missions could agree and decided to found the school after the foundation of the missions church federation. Because of delay in the planning stage and the building of the common theological school some missions did education and ordination for their own because of the need. On the one side there was a lack of money to build the buildings and on the other side there was a lack on personnel, too. This situation was complicated because of church politics. One person couldn't be the leader of the school because he didn't want to built a confessional school. But the Leipzig Mission prevailed against the other missions and planned the common school in their area under the leadership of one of their own missionaries. Necessary furlough and the death of one person which was planned to lead the school caused further delay. After finishing the buildings within the time and combining the teaching staff out of the various missions in a way that all could accept, the opening of the school as decided on October 1939. But the school couldn't be opened because of the outbreak of World War Two and its effects on Tanganyika. The Ausgustana Lutheran Mission then took care for the areas of the German Missions. In the beginning the Germans could stay and work, but within the time they have been interned. Even though the leader of the mission church federation Rother struggled passionately and with great readiness to make sacrifices for the opening of the school the mission refused temporary. After the internment of Rother and other Germans and the fact that the end of the war was not foreseeable, the leaders of the Augustana Lutheran Mission recognized that they needed a theological school to exonerate the missionaries and to meet the needs of the churches. Therefore they entrusted Dr. Reusch with a teaching assignment. In this way the first theological course under the leading of the Americans came into being while the 2nd World War. While the World War there have been ordinations because of the need, too. Some of the new pastors have been teached in short courses. Short after the War the Augustana Lutheran Mission began with the foundation of a permanent theological education. In the first time the school was in Lwandai because there have been suitable premises. Later these haven't been sufficient any more and the school was moved to Makumira. The school gradual has been extended and built up. Today it is part of the Lutheran Tumaini University. / Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology / M. Th. (Missiology)

Theological training is in a crisis worldwide. Although the role that Theological Seminaries have fulfilled is acknowledged, there is a growing concern about the ability of these institutions to serve the upcoming generations of Christian leaders. Some warn they may not be well tailored for our post-modern age. Many people feel that the Seminary as an institution is in danger of extinction due to irrelevancy. Seminaries, in general, are perceived as not connecting to the needs of today’s church. The Auckland Park Theological Seminary (ATS), whose training is the subject of this research, is not excluded from this concern of the Church for relevant theological training. Many pastors of the AFM of SA are of the opinion that the training offered at the ATS does not effectively train pastors for the ministry. The purpose of this research is to investigate and describe how pastors who studied at the ATS experienced their theological training, as well as to offer guidelines to the Church and the ATS to develop a more effective model for theological training. Semi-structured, phenomenological interviews were conducted with a number of pastors. These interviews were taped with their permission. The question asked during each interview was: “How do you experience the theological training offered at the ATS as preparation for the ministry?”. The research has revealed a number of themes and sub-themes that should be addressed by a new model for theological training. They are as follows: • There is a need of a thorough theological education as foundation, especially in the areas of Bible knowledge and Dogmatics. • The focus of the training is mainly cognitive and not practical. There should be a greater emphasis on the “how” of doing ministry. • The respondents indicated that they have a need that their own spiritual gifts and ministries should be developed. • They experience a lack of training in interpersonal skills. There is especially a need for training on how the pastor’s family should effectively function in ministry. • The research has shown that the ATS should take co-responsibility to develop the character and spirituality of their students. • The students expressed a need that the lecturers should be their mentors. • The greatest needs were in the areas of management and ministerial skills. The students felt that they were not adequately prepared in the areas of leadership, management of personnel, team building, developing a vision for ministry, marketing and funding, preaching and communication skills, how to mobilize the members of their churches, the Missiological purpose of the Church, youth – and children’s ministry, the planning of church services, music and worship, technical skills such as video productions, the use of multimedia, and computer skills, and general skills such as the practice of the sacraments, hospital visitation, and the role of statistics. • The research has shown that the students have a need for specialized training in accordance with their gifts and ministries. Based on these results, guidelines are then offered for a more effective model for theological training. / Dr. B.J. Geyser

This is in many ways a limited study. The first limitation is that only four denominations, the Anglican, Congregational, Methodist, Presbyterian, are considered and nothing is said about the work of the Moravians, Lutherans, Roman Catholics and the Dutch Reformed Churches in the field of theological education. The second limitation is that it is a study of theological education as distinct from general, industrial and other forms of education. All the forms of theological education considered here were run at missionary institutions that offered other forms of education and prepared their students for public government examinations with certain government conditions to be met. Moreover, a certain standard of general education was required before candidates were admitted to the theological course. Therefore, theological education was constantly dependent upon and was influenced by secular education and government regulations concerning secular education. For that reason the first chapter is a very brief survey of White Education in the Cape and African education in all four provinces from the beginning to 1915, the year before Fort Hare opened its doors to students seeking 'higher' education. The second chapter discusses the educational programme of Lovedale because Lovedale generally determined the whole of African education in the Cape. When Lovedale and the Methodists transferred their training to the South African Native College at Fort Hare, theological students had to abide by educational and other regulations of the university College. Chapters III and IV deal with the Methodist theological schools and the courses followed at Fort Hare. The third limitation of this study is that it is a study of the theological education of Africans, which category includes Coloureds and Indians because in the four churches under review they were trained together with Africans. In all churches under review here the theological education of whites was done in an unsatisfactory and ad hoc way. Many men were ordained without a satisfactory theological education. They were given some training by their superintendents, bishops or other men appointed to do the job in addition to their own normal duties. A few were sent overseas and many went through some arrangement within this country. St Paul's Theological College for Anglicans was opened in 1902. A start was made with the training of white Methodist Candidates for the ministry in the buildings of the Wesleyan High School for Girls in Grahamstown, in July 1928, under the Rev. James Pendlebury, B.A. (a supernumerary). Dr. William Flint who started the Methodist College as Principal, at Bollihope, Cape Town, in 1929, was seventy-five years of age when he opened the new Sbllege. From 1948 white theological students of the Methodist, Presbyterian and Congregational Churches have been trained at Livingstone House, Rhodes University, Grahamstown. .The final limitation is that this study ends at the close of 1960 and thus omits some of the exciting developments in theological education that have taken place since then. These limitations and demarcations were, however, necessary in order to focus attention on a small area where the main problems could be seen clearly, unencumbered by lesser issues. Where the training was run on denominational lines, it seemed necessary wherever possible to give a chapter to each denomination, and to attempt to pull the threads together in a concluding chapter.

Submitted to the Faculty of Arts in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Theology in the field of Practical Theology at the university of Zululand, 2005. / This research is an investigation into spiritual formation programmes available at different theological institutions in Kwa-Zulu Natal with the aim of finding out how spiritual formation is being intentionally or specifically pursued and whether these programmes are meeting the spiritual needs of the students. The research is based on the hypothesis that spiritual formation should have a legitimate place in theological education in spite continuing disagreements about the nature and place of spiritual formation. If it is imperative that theological graduates be people of competence and character, then spiritual formation must be as much a part of the agenda of the institution as academic competence. Curricular standards for theological education involves concern about intellectual, professional and spiritual formation. Unfortunately the current dominant structure of theological curricula tends to favour academic instruction, tolerate the practical and compartmentalize the spiritual. The average Protestant theological institute suffers from the perception that spiritual formation is not necessary. A reason for this can be traced to a belief that the church is the proper environment for spiritual formation. Cognitive instruction is thought of as the province of the curriculum, with spiritual formation happening implicitly, informally and on a personal basis. The present study contributes empirical data to the growing literature on the relationship between spiritual formation and theological education. Research was conducted at five selected theological institutions to reveal an imbalance in the nature of theological education where the focus is on the academic aspects of learning. This study shows that attempts to take spiritual formation seriously were met with resistance. The field-work revealed that only one of the selected theological institutions has an intentional spiritual formation programme. In the main, the majority of theological institutions did not have an intentional spiritual formation programme despite the fact that they feel an obligation to develop students spiritually as seen by the varied spiritual activities in place. The spiritual maturity of future Christian leaders is an important problem and needs to be addressed throughout theological training. Spiritual formation cannot be left to chance, any more than the pastoral or strictly academic components of ministry formation. This study highlighted a critical task of theological education: the responsibility to develop students holistically. While spiritual formation can and should be intentionally pursued in specific courses, it is important to see it as a crucial dimension of theological education as a whole. This study concluded with general observations about the future of theological education, especially the need for an integrated education. An approach to spiritual formation was offered for an evangelical theological institution. The findings of this study underscore a much neglected area in the training and equipping of pastors that needs immediate remedial action. The weight of the research's contribution lies in its empirical research and it is of publishable quality

The Seventh-Day Adventist (SDA) Church operates one of the largest private educational systems in the United States. However, throughout the past ten years, there has been a steady decrease in the enrollment of Seventh-Day Adventist schools, although church membership has increased. Previous research has shown that SDA ministers have considerable influence, and have proved particularly influential in decisions regarding SDA schools. Since the educational values of SDA schools are conveyed to the church members by their ministers, it is important for Church leaders to have a knowledge of the values held by their ministers. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the perceptions of the SDA Church ministers concerning the values, effectiveness, fiscal status, and future structure of the SDA schools. / Ed. D.

published_or_final_version / Architecture / Master / Master of Architecture