Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Rostock / Includes bibliographical references (p. [vii]-x)

Zugl.: Tübingen, Univ., Diss., 2006

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-07-18T12:07:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruna Barletta.pdf: 1159795 bytes, checksum: e94f1b9de9ca67e4132c7d30cae17153 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-18T12:07:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruna Barletta.pdf: 1159795 bytes, checksum: e94f1b9de9ca67e4132c7d30cae17153 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-23 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / The present study is an analysis over third parties’ measures against an award that directly affects them. Initially, the principles that sustain the arbitration institute shall be investigated. Following, the concepts of party and third party to the arbitration agreement shall be verified. Finally, the award and its effects are examined, in order to enable the final analysis of which remedies against the award are available under the Brazilian legal system to the parties and to third parties of the arbitration agreement / O presente estudo compreende uma análise acerca da interposição de recursos por terceiros prejudicados em face da sentença arbitral proferida. Inicialmente, analisam-se os princípios que estruturam o instituto da arbitragem, para, em seguida, verificar-se os conceitos de partes e terceiros sob a ótica arbitral. Posteriormente, examinam-se a sentença arbitral e seus efeitos, com o objetivo de adentrar a parte derradeira da presente análise, composta pelos remédios das partes contra a sentença arbitral e, finalmente, pelos recursos de terceiros prejudicados propriamente ditos, cabíveis em face da sentença arbitral

O trabalho tem o objetivo de analisar os critérios para atribuição de responsabilidade tributária aos sócios das sociedades. A análise se destina a apreensão dos critérios de racionalidade a ser observados pelo aplicador da norma quando da incidência da norma de responsabilidade e não propriamente a identificar a extensão da correta interpretação das prescrições do código tributário que definem a responsabilidade dos sócios. Abordaremos a personalidade das pessoas jurídicas e os requisitos legais para a sua desconsideração no direito tributário, a construção da norma jurídica que cria a relação jurídica tributária, bem como a responsabilidade tributária de terceiros. Será também analisada a importância do processo e do procedimento administrativo na formação e no acertamento da relação tributária e o reflexo do desenvolvimento desse processo na legitimidade tanto da constituição do crédito tributário como da atribuição de responsabilidade. O enfoque do trabalho é estabelecer um cotejo entre a presunção de liquidez e certeza da certidão de dívida ativa e as garantias fundamentais do devido processo legal, da ampla devesa e da legalidade para criticar a legitimidade do crédito constituído sem a observância dessas garantias e as conseqüências dessa perda de legitimidade do crédito nos meios de defesa disponíveis ao devedor / The study aims to examine the criteria for allocation of tax liability for shareholders of companies. The analysis is intended to seize the criteria of rationality to be observed by the applicator of the standard when the incidence of the standard of liability and not properly identify the extent of correct interpretation of the requirements of the tax code that define the liability of shareholders. We will discuss the personality of the legal and statutory requirements for its disregard of the tax law, building the rule of law creates the legal relationship of tax and the tax liability of third parties. It will also be discussed the importance of the process and administrative procedure in the training and the tax relationship and rightly reflect the development of this process in the legitimacy of both the constitution of the tax credit as the attribution of responsibility. The main work is to establish a comparison between the presumption of liquidity and certainty of the certificate of debt outstanding and the basic guarantees of due process, the wide defense and legality to criticize the legitimacy of the claim made without the observance of these guarantees and the consequences this loss of legitimacy of the claim in any defense available to the debtor

Internet Service Providers (ISP’s) are crucial to the operation and development of the Internet. However, through the performance of their basic functions, they faced the great risk of civil and criminal liability for unlawful content posted by third parties. As this risk threatened the potential of the Internet, various jurisdictions opted to promulgate legislation that granted ISP’s safe harbours from liability. The South African (RSA) response is Chapter XI of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (ECTA). The protection it provides is however not absolute. It is limited to ISP’s that are members of an Industry Representative Body (IRB) and those ISP’s must perform particular functions in relation to third party content in a certain manner to obtain limited liability. Due to the ECTA’s limited application and a lack of authority, the question is raised as to what is the liability of ISP’s for unlawful content posted by third parties? This dissertation pays particular attention to ISP liability for third party defamatory statements, hate speech, and obscene and indecent material. The role and characteristics of ISP’s in the functioning of the Internet is described. It is determined that a wide legal definition would be required to encompass the many roles they perform. The definition provided by the ECTA is wide and many different types of ISP can fall underneath it. This may have unintended consequences as entities may receive protection that the legislature did not intend. The appropriate laws in the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom are surveyed and suggestions as to the extent of ISP liability in circumstances where the ECTA does not apply are made. It is established that their position is uncertain due to difficulties in applying the law to the Internet. This could result in the law being applied incorrectly and ISP’s erroneously found liable. The ECTA’s threshold requirements limit the availability of the safe harbor provisions to ISP’s that are members of a recognised IRB. The IRB must comply with an extensive set of requirements to obtain recognition. The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that only responsible ISP’s obtain the protection provided by the act. After an examination of these requirements, their necessity is questioned as their purpose appears to be contrary to the logic of the safe harbours provided by the ECTA. The safe harbours are analysed and comparisons made to similar legislation that exists in the USA and the European Union (EU). It was established that the ECTA is a hybrid of the USA and EU legislation, and to a certain extent improves on them. It was suggested that the extent of ISP liability in relation to certain unlawful content is clearer under the ECTA. However, exceptions may exist in relation to hate speech and obscene and indecent content as a result of legislation that does not properly take the technology of the Internet into account. It was recommended that certain action be taken to correct this position to prevent any negative effects on the Internet industry and conflict with the objectives of the ECTA. The provision of limited liability contained in the ECTA is balanced with a notice and takedown procedure, which provides relief to victims of unlawful content. This procedure is analysed and it appears to be effective in providing relief. However, through an examination of concerns raised in relation to this type of procedure as it exists in the USA and the EU, it is suggested that certain flaws exist. The take-down procedure negatively effects the freedom of expression and the third party’s rights to due process. Further, the threshold requirements result in not all the users of the Internet being provided with the same remedies. It is recommended that certain action be taken to correct these flaws. The solution provided by the ECTA should be favoured over the uncertainty that existed before it promulgation. It may be necessary to correct particular flaws that exist. Certain recommendations are suggested in this regard and the concluding chapter.

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:18:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_rodrigo_moraes.pdf: 517685 bytes, checksum: 327b4e568df1eb7ee168d2923a00816d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-12-01 / The study aims to examine the criteria for allocation of tax liability for shareholders of companies. The analysis is intended to seize the criteria of rationality to be observed by the applicator of the standard when the incidence of the standard of liability and not properly identify the extent of correct interpretation of the requirements of the tax code that define the liability of shareholders. We will discuss the personality of the legal and statutory requirements for its disregard of the tax law, building the rule of law creates the legal relationship of tax and the tax liability of third parties. It will also be discussed the importance of the process and administrative procedure in the training and the tax relationship and rightly reflect the development of this process in the legitimacy of both the constitution of the tax credit as the attribution of responsibility. The main work is to establish a comparison between the presumption of liquidity and certainty of the certificate of debt outstanding and the basic guarantees of due process, the wide defense and legality to criticize the legitimacy of the claim made without the observance of these guarantees and the consequences this loss of legitimacy of the claim in any defense available to the debtor / O trabalho tem o objetivo de analisar os critérios para atribuição de responsabilidade tributária aos sócios das sociedades. A análise se destina a apreensão dos critérios de racionalidade a ser observados pelo aplicador da norma quando da incidência da norma de responsabilidade e não propriamente a identificar a extensão da correta interpretação das prescrições do código tributário que definem a responsabilidade dos sócios. Abordaremos a personalidade das pessoas jurídicas e os requisitos legais para a sua desconsideração no direito tributário, a construção da norma jurídica que cria a relação jurídica tributária, bem como a responsabilidade tributária de terceiros. Será também analisada a importância do processo e do procedimento administrativo na formação e no acertamento da relação tributária e o reflexo do desenvolvimento desse processo na legitimidade tanto da constituição do crédito tributário como da atribuição de responsabilidade. O enfoque do trabalho é estabelecer um cotejo entre a presunção de liquidez e certeza da certidão de dívida ativa e as garantias fundamentais do devido processo legal, da ampla devesa e da legalidade para criticar a legitimidade do crédito constituído sem a observância dessas garantias e as conseqüências dessa perda de legitimidade do crédito nos meios de defesa disponíveis ao devedor

Summary in Afrikaans and English / Against the background of the volume of Third Party Claims instituted annually and considering the cost involved therein, it has become increasingly important that Industrial Psychologists be consulted to assist in the quantifying of such claims. From an Industrial Psychologist's view, these claims can be quantified by making use of certain Industrial Psychology techniques. These techniques include psychometrical evaluation, applying the knowledge on:- training, job analysis, interviewing and guidance, career planning and ergonomics. The purpose of this study was to liaise with the Legal Profession to identify the requirements and problem areas experienced in the establishing and quantifying of Third Party Insurance Claims. The needs thus identified served as the basis for this study. In the process of defining and categorising these problems, it became apparent that these requirements could be addressed satisfactorily by Industrial Psychologists. It was therefore possible also to determine whether Industrial Psychology as a Science, could contribute to solving these problems. To determine therefore whether Industrial Psychology could actually address and solve these problems and whether the Courts would recognise the contribution of Industrial Psychologists, an actual case study was made of a matter where two Industrial Psychologists had made evaluations. Researching the methods of evaluations employed, and viewing the finding of the Court thereafter, it became apparent that Industrial Psychology can satisfy the need encountered by the legal profession therein. It is further concluded that the curriculum of Industrial Psychology may be successfully applied as an accepted Science in the quantifying of Third Party Insurance Claims. / Teen die agtergrond van die hoeveelheid derdepartyeise wat jaarliks ingedien word, met inagneming van die koste verbonde, word dit toenemend belangrik dat bedryfsielkunde behulpsaam moet wees met die kwantifisering van sulke eise. Vanuit 'n bedryfsielkundige oogpunt kan hierdie eise gekwantifiseer word deur gebruik te maak van sekere bedryfsielkundige tegnieke. Hierdie tegnieke sluit in, psigometriese evaluering, kennis oor opleiding, posontleding, onderhoudvoering en voorligting, loopbaanbeplanning en ergonomika. / Industrial and Organisational Psychology / M. Com. (Industrial and Organisational Psychology)