• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • No language data
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Formulations of 100 mg Trimebutine Maleate (Recutin™ and Polybutin™) in Healthy Male Volunteers Using the LC-MS/MS Method

Jhee, Ok Hwa, Lee, Yun Sik, Shaw, Leslie M., Jeon, Yong Cheol, Lee, Min Ho, Lee, Seung Hoon, Kang, Ju Seop 01 January 2007 (has links)
Background: Trimebutine maleate is a prokinetic agent that acts directly on the smooth muscle of the GI tract. A bioequivalence (BE) study of 2 oral formulations of 100 mg trimebutine maleate (TMB) was carried out in 24 healthy male Korean volunteers according to a crossover-randomized design. Methods: Subjects were given a single dose of 2 100 mg tablets of each formulation. The test and reference formulations were Recutin™ (Hutax Co., South Korea) and Polybutin™ (Samil Co., South Korea), respectively. Each set of tablets was administered with 240 ml of water to subjects after 10 h overnight fasting on 2 treatment days separated by a 1 week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 36 h. Plasma was analyzed for the main metabolite of TMB, N-monodesmethyl trimebutine (nor-TMB), by a validated LC with MS/MS detection capacity for nor-TMB in the range 5-1500 ng/ml, with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 ng/ml. Several pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (including AUCt, AUCinfinity, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, and Ke) were determined from the plasma concentrations of nor-TMB of both formulations. AUCt, AUCinfinity, and Cmax were tested for BE after log-transformation of the data. Results: No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence intervals (98.98%112.03% for AUCt; 98.60%-113.20% for AUCinfinity; 90.85%-107.87% for Cmax) for the test and reference were found within KFDA acceptance range of 80-125%. Conclusions: Based on these statistical inferences, it was concluded that Recutin™ is bioequivalent to Polybutin™ and can be used interchangeably in a clinical setting.

Page generated in 0.0834 seconds