Habilitationsschrift--Heidelberg. / Includes bibliographical references and index.

Univ., Diss., 2003--Bonn.

Inaug.-Diss.--Bonn, 1868. / Vita.

Universiẗat, Diss., 2003--Bonn.

Zugl.: München, Hochsch. für Philosophie, Diss., 2007.

Zugl.: Tübingen, Universiẗat, Diss., 2005.

Texte remanié de: Dissertation--Fachbereich I--Trier, 1974. / Bibliogr. p. 233-243. Index.

This work explores the possibilities of Hegel's critique of liberalisms and Marxism. Firstly, I define the "Return to Hegel", or more precisely, the way how we should conceive of this return to Hegel in order to really return to him. In second part, this formal definition of return is given its content, i.e. Hegel's concept of state. This concept had been denied by the doctrine of liberalism as well as of Marxism and this denial, as I try to demonstrate, can be considered a theoretical cause of totalitarianism. Or, in other words, totalitarianism can be speculatively comprehended as the manifestation of this denial. Thus as long as we live in a post-totalitarian era, Hegel is our contemporary. The last part consists of an explication of Hegel's critique of understanding (Verstand). The main reason for this explication is that liberalism and Marxism are 'understanding'- theories of state, and because of that, they were not able to conceive of the state as an object of Reason (Vernunft) and therefore, they failed to recognize the state as rational in itself. The theoretical result of this analysis is that Hegel's critique of understanding can be grasped, so to speak, as a 'critique of ideology avant la lettre', if the concept of ideology is adequately redefined.

Zugl.: Osnabrück, Univ., Diss., 2006

Originally published as author's dissertation--Munich, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [245]-252).