Le traitement du virus de l'hépatite C (VHC) a connu une révolution récente, rapide et exemplaire grâce à l'arrivée des agents antiviraux directs (AAD) en plusieurs vagues depuis 2011, détrônant ainsi la bithérapie interféron-pégylé/ribavirine. Ces nouveaux traitements ont été rapidement confrontés à des limites concernant leur efficacité et leur tolérance notamment à leurs débuts avec les inhibiteurs de la protéase NS3/4A de première génération. L'arrivée de nouveaux AAD sur le marché lors d'une 2ème vague en 2014 a permis toutefois de surpasser celles-ci et de devenir le traitement de référence du VHC.Leur efficacité remarquable a laissé naître l'idée d'une potentielle élimination du VHC grâce à l'utilisation universelle de ces traitements. Cependant, leur coût élevé et les comportements à risque observés dans des sous-groupes de population (utilisateurs de drogues intraveineuses et homosexuels) restent encore des problématiques cruciales à surmonter pour espérer atteindre les objectifs fixés par l'Organisation Mondiale de la Santé en 2030 concernant l'élimination du VHC. De plus ces traitements, permettant l'élimination virale quasi-systématique et donc consécutivement une diminution du risque de complications hépatiques, ont été récemment confrontés à une polémique concernant un potentiel risque de récidive précoce de carcinome hépatocellulaire (CHC) suite à une exposition à ces derniers.Le travail présenté dans cette thèse s'articule autour de trois problématiques ayant toutes pour objectif principal d'optimiser l'utilisation de ces traitements dans l'optique de contrôler l'histoire naturelle de la maladie à l'échelle individuelle et à l'échelle populationnelle par l'intermédiaire de diverses méthodes statistiques.Nos résultats ont permis de montrer au sein d’une première problématique ayant exploré l'efficacité et la tolérance de ces traitements antiviraux à l’échelle individuelle: (i) une efficacité antivirale moindre que celle annoncée dans les essais de phase III des inhibiteurs de protéase de première génération(télaprévir et bocéprévir), (ii) un effet indésirable significatif des inhibiteurs de protéase de première génération sur la fonction rénale, (iii) une tolérance moins bonne de ces premières molécules que lors du traitement par bithérapie avec une incidence accrue d'anémie probablement liée à un surdosage en ribavirine induit par les inhibiteurs de protéase et (iv) une efficacité antivirale remarquable des AAD arrivés depuis 2014 sans impact des caractéristiques du patient ni des dosages pharmacologiques sur la réponse virologique. Dans un second temps, la problématique d'un risque de récidive de CHC accru après un traitement par AAD a également été explorée par l'analyse d'une cohorte locale, celle-ci ayant conclu à l'absence de risque accru comparé à un groupe de patients non exposés. Enfin, nos travaux basés sur la modélisation de la transmission du VHC en France dans la population coinfectée VIH-VHCont montré qu'un taux annuel de traitement par AAD de 50% était nécessaire dans la population homosexuelle ayant des pratiques à haut-risque de transmission pour contrer l'épidémie actuellement observée.Nos travaux ont donc permis d'apporter des données pour optimiser l'utilisation des nouveaux traitements anti-VHC par l'intermédiaire de diverses approches statistiques et ont apporté des éléments de réponse aux grandes problématiques actuelles. L'efficacité exemplaire et la tolérance quasi-parfaite des dernières molécules antivirales permettent une utilisation universelle de ces traitements dans toutes les populations de patients. Des études complémentaires robustes sont cependant nécessaires pour apporter des arguments à la question de la récidive du CHC. Des efforts sont également attendus concernant l'accès au traitement, la diminution des coûts associés et un dépistage renforcé du VHC pour espérer pouvoir éradiquer un jour cette maladie. / The arrival of direct-acting antivirals agents (DAAs) has spurred a rapid revolution in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV), supplanting the previous standard of care, i.e. pegylated interferon and ribavirin. These new treatments are associated with an increased rate of virological response however they rapidly faced some limits more particularly at the beginning with the first generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors. From 2014 on the second wave of DAA was available for treatment of chronic HCV infection and surpassed previous encountered limits. These treatments are nowadays the gold standard for HCV treatment in high-income countries.The idea of HCV eradication recently emerged since DAA treatment are highly effective. However, their associated high cost and recent high-risk behaviors associated with an increased risk of HCV transmission (among intravenous drug users and homosexuals) have been reported. These issues need therefore to be addressed in order to achieve the objectives of the World Health Organization for 2030 of an HCV eradication. Moreover, these treatments allow a sustained virological response in almost all patients and consequently reduce the risk of liver-related complications, but a recent controversy regarding a potential increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after DAA treatment has been raised.Three issues will be extensively discussed in this manuscript regarding how these treatments can be used to optimize their effect on HCV natural history at the individual and population level through different statistical approaches.As regards the first issue, this project allowed us to demonstrate regarding the tolerance and efficacy of DAA treatment: (i) a lower antiviral efficacy than previously reported in the phase III trials for first generationprotease inhibitor regimen (telaprevir and boceprevir), (ii) impairment of renal function during first generation protease inhibitor treatment, (iii) an increased rate of reported side effects during first-generation protease inhibitor treatment and more particularly anemia, potentially related to an increased ribavirin biodisponibility induced by protease inhibitor intake and (iv) a remarkable antiviral efficacy of second generation DAAs without impact of patients' characteristics norpharmacology on virological response rate. The recent issue regarding a higher risk of HCC recurrence after DAA treatment was also explored through a local cohort study and no impact of DAA treatment was observed when comparing DAA-exposed vs non DAA-exposed patients. Finally, we conducted amodelling study on HCV transmission in the coinfected HIV-HCV French population and our results suggested that an annual DAA treatment coverage rate of 50% was required in the homosexual population with high-risk behaviors to counter the recent observed epidemic in this population.Our different works provide new insights on how to optimize the use of DAA treatment through several statistical approaches and bring new elements for discussion on the recent controversy. The new DAA have an excellent efficacy and tolerance profile and should be universally used in all populations without restriction. However, further studies are required to explore on a deeper level the question regarding HCC recurrence after DAA treatment. Efforts are also still needed regarding DAA treatment access, associated costs and HCV screening to reach the objective of HCV eradication

The objectives of the study were (1) to quantify adherence rate among the study participants in the ART unit and (2) to identify factors that contribute to non-adherence. This cross sectional study was carried out at Nekemete referral clinic. Data was collected using a self-developed structured questionnaire where a total of 338 participants grouped into adherent and non-adherent based on a score derived from an adherence assessment were interviewed. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. By using multivariate analysis of variables identified as correlates of adherence, non-adherence was common among those; with age between 18-30 yrs, with no education, who were not married, who had no pipe water supply, those with no electricity in the house, who perceived had no access to assistance from providers, who perceived the health care providers (HCPs) did not keep information confidentially, who had a language barrier with providers, and who were treated with a psychiatric illness. The study concludes that adherence is multi-factorial and varies significantly by individual and care setting. Psychosocial factors were found to impact adherence and should be analysed in more detail by further studies. Three psychosocial factors were independently associated with poor adherence: the study found that patients perceiving poor access; those perceiving problems in information confidentiality (and possibly experiencing stigmatisation); and having psychiatric morbidity (and possibly with less social support) are more likely to be non-adherent. Furthermore, individuals without electricity and those without piped water supply, implying low income, are at risk for non-adherence / Health Studies / M.A. (Public Health)

The objectives of the study were (1) to quantify adherence rate among the study participants in the ART unit and (2) to identify factors that contribute to non-adherence. This cross sectional study was carried out at Nekemete referral clinic. Data was collected using a self-developed structured questionnaire where a total of 338 participants grouped into adherent and non-adherent based on a score derived from an adherence assessment were interviewed. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. By using multivariate analysis of variables identified as correlates of adherence, non-adherence was common among those; with age between 18-30 yrs, with no education, who were not married, who had no pipe water supply, those with no electricity in the house, who perceived had no access to assistance from providers, who perceived the health care providers (HCPs) did not keep information confidentially, who had a language barrier with providers, and who were treated with a psychiatric illness. The study concludes that adherence is multi-factorial and varies significantly by individual and care setting. Psychosocial factors were found to impact adherence and should be analysed in more detail by further studies. Three psychosocial factors were independently associated with poor adherence: the study found that patients perceiving poor access; those perceiving problems in information confidentiality (and possibly experiencing stigmatisation); and having psychiatric morbidity (and possibly with less social support) are more likely to be non-adherent. Furthermore, individuals without electricity and those without piped water supply, implying low income, are at risk for non-adherence / Health Studies / M.A. (Public Health)