Spelling suggestions: "subject:"vitruvius pollicis.""
11 |
Literarische Vitruvrezeption in Leon Battista Albertis De re aedificatoriaWulfram, Hartmut. January 2001 (has links)
Thesis--Universität Göttingen, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 380-429) and indexes.
|
12 |
Literarische Vitruvrezeption in Leon Battista Albertis De re aedificatoriaWulfram, Hartmut. January 2001 (has links)
Thesis--Universität Göttingen, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 380-429) and indexes.
|
13 |
Repensando vitrúvio : reflexão acerca de princípios e procedimentos de projetoManenti, Leandro January 2014 (has links)
Este trabalho propõe-se a retomar os seis conceitos fundamentais relacionados ao projeto arquitetônico descritos por Vitrúvio em seu tratado De architectura no século I a.C. Analisando a bibliografia a respeito do autor romano, identificam-se, ainda hoje, lacunas nos entendimentos a respeito da teoria do projeto, sendo estas motivadoras do aprofundamento proposto. A partir do mapeamento completo das ocorrências dos conceitos de ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor e distributio no texto do tratado, bem como dos demais conceitos correlatos, o estudo procura levantar e discutir os possíveis entendimentos, que, na sequência, são confrontados com as descrições de projetos também contidas no tratado. A partir deste cotejo, procura-se validar os princípios e procedimento de projeto segundo Vitrúvio, além de contribuir para a discussão do fazer arquitetônico de forma ampla. / This study resumes the six fundamental concepts related to architectural design described by Vitruvius in his treatise De architectura in the first century BC. Analyzing the literature about the Roman author, it is possible to identify, still today, shortcomings in the understanding of the design theory, which are motivators to the proposed in depth study. From the complete mapping of the occurrences of the concepts of ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor and distributio in the text of the treatise, as well as other related concepts, the study seeks to raise and discuss the possible understandings, which in sequence are confronted with descriptions of the projects also contained in the treatise. From this comparison, the study aims at validating the principles and procedures of designing according to Vitruvius as well as contributing to the discussion of architectural making in a broad sense.
|
14 |
Re-thinking the Roman domus how architects and orators construct self, space, and language /McIntosh, Gillian Elizabeth, January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2003. / Title from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains viii, 220 p. Includes abstract and vita. Advisor: Erik T. Gunderson, Dept. of Greek and Latin. Includes bibliographical references (p. 203-220).
|
15 |
Repensando vitrúvio : reflexão acerca de princípios e procedimentos de projetoManenti, Leandro January 2014 (has links)
Este trabalho propõe-se a retomar os seis conceitos fundamentais relacionados ao projeto arquitetônico descritos por Vitrúvio em seu tratado De architectura no século I a.C. Analisando a bibliografia a respeito do autor romano, identificam-se, ainda hoje, lacunas nos entendimentos a respeito da teoria do projeto, sendo estas motivadoras do aprofundamento proposto. A partir do mapeamento completo das ocorrências dos conceitos de ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor e distributio no texto do tratado, bem como dos demais conceitos correlatos, o estudo procura levantar e discutir os possíveis entendimentos, que, na sequência, são confrontados com as descrições de projetos também contidas no tratado. A partir deste cotejo, procura-se validar os princípios e procedimento de projeto segundo Vitrúvio, além de contribuir para a discussão do fazer arquitetônico de forma ampla. / This study resumes the six fundamental concepts related to architectural design described by Vitruvius in his treatise De architectura in the first century BC. Analyzing the literature about the Roman author, it is possible to identify, still today, shortcomings in the understanding of the design theory, which are motivators to the proposed in depth study. From the complete mapping of the occurrences of the concepts of ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor and distributio in the text of the treatise, as well as other related concepts, the study seeks to raise and discuss the possible understandings, which in sequence are confronted with descriptions of the projects also contained in the treatise. From this comparison, the study aims at validating the principles and procedures of designing according to Vitruvius as well as contributing to the discussion of architectural making in a broad sense.
|
16 |
Repensando vitrúvio : reflexão acerca de princípios e procedimentos de projetoManenti, Leandro January 2014 (has links)
Este trabalho propõe-se a retomar os seis conceitos fundamentais relacionados ao projeto arquitetônico descritos por Vitrúvio em seu tratado De architectura no século I a.C. Analisando a bibliografia a respeito do autor romano, identificam-se, ainda hoje, lacunas nos entendimentos a respeito da teoria do projeto, sendo estas motivadoras do aprofundamento proposto. A partir do mapeamento completo das ocorrências dos conceitos de ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor e distributio no texto do tratado, bem como dos demais conceitos correlatos, o estudo procura levantar e discutir os possíveis entendimentos, que, na sequência, são confrontados com as descrições de projetos também contidas no tratado. A partir deste cotejo, procura-se validar os princípios e procedimento de projeto segundo Vitrúvio, além de contribuir para a discussão do fazer arquitetônico de forma ampla. / This study resumes the six fundamental concepts related to architectural design described by Vitruvius in his treatise De architectura in the first century BC. Analyzing the literature about the Roman author, it is possible to identify, still today, shortcomings in the understanding of the design theory, which are motivators to the proposed in depth study. From the complete mapping of the occurrences of the concepts of ordinatio, dispositio, eurythmia, symmetria, decor and distributio in the text of the treatise, as well as other related concepts, the study seeks to raise and discuss the possible understandings, which in sequence are confronted with descriptions of the projects also contained in the treatise. From this comparison, the study aims at validating the principles and procedures of designing according to Vitruvius as well as contributing to the discussion of architectural making in a broad sense.
|
17 |
Fabrique et discours : Salomon de Caus and the Vitruvian ideal of architectureSpriggs, Megan. January 1999 (has links)
A study of Salomon de Caus' manuscript commentary on the first book of Jean Martin's French translation of Vitruvius (c. 1622--1624) which takes the form of a dialogue between an Architect, an Engineer and a Mathematician. The removal of music and natural philosophy from the Vitruvion program of education; the need for the updating of Vitruvius' classical theory of founding cities and building their fortified walls; the emphasis on convenience in the planning of buildings and the separation of engineering and architecture within the Vitruvion corpus all point to a reduction in the role of architecture as cosmic analogy. A comparison with de Caus' treatises on perspective, mechanics, musical harmony, solar clocks and mensuration reveal that for de Caus, it is the engineer whose making can reconcile human and divine through a form of technical know-how that although it cannot be considered true knowledge, reveals the wonder of God to the senses.
|
18 |
O Cosmos no Corpus : Vitrúvio e as estruturas do universo no tratado da arquiteturaMafra, Adriano Vilela January 2017 (has links)
Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Anastasia Guidi Itokazu / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do ABC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia, São Bernardo do Campo, 2017. / A pesquisa investiga a arquitetura do universo tal como proposta por Vitrúvio no
século I a.C. São apresentadas as artes e disciplinas da arquitetura vinculadas às
práticas da gnomônica e o contexto que envolve o arquiteto na Antiguidade, tal como
alguns aspectos políticos e religiosos que integram o discurso das estruturas do
universo descritas no Tratado de Arquitetura. São desenvolvidas as questões que
envolvem o livro como objeto traduzido e transformado ao longo de milhares de anos
e algumas reflexões quanto aos desenhos e as pinturas mencionadas na obra. Também
temos os comentários e desenvolvimentos das questões quanto à cosmologia junto às
elaborações de mapas e ilustrações a partir do conteúdo descrito pelo arquiteto. Foram
pesquisadas as teorias de autores que antecedem o período da obra e que forneceram
os ensinamentos para a execução das enxertias de Vitrúvio, assim como também se
buscou aplicar os termos que são apresentadas como definições constitutivas da
arquitetura, ao considerarmos o livro como um produto desta arte. / The present research investigates the architecture of the universe as proposed by
Vitruvius in the first century BC. The arts and disciplines of architecture related to the
practices of gnomonics and the context surrounding the architect in Antiquity are
presented, as well as some political and religious aspects that end up integrating the
discourse about the structures of the universe as described in the Treatise on
Architecture. The book is hereby presented as an object translated and transformed
over thousands of years and some reflections on the drawings and paintings are
proposed. Comments and developments regarding the cosmology required for the
elaborations of maps and illustrations are also examined in the text provided by the
architect. Finally, some of the the theories of authors that precede the period of the
work and who provided the teachings for Vitruvius' graftings were investigated, as
well the applications tof terms that are presented as constitutive definitions of the
architecture, the book being taken as a product of this art.
|
19 |
Fabrique et discours : Salomon de Caus and the Vitruvian ideal of architectureSpriggs, Megan. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
20 |
Vitruvius, memory and imagination : on the production of archaeological knowledge and the construction of classical monumentsMillette, Daniel M. 05 1900 (has links)
As the "Revolution" threatened Rome during the final decades of the Republic, the many
landscapes of the city — built, intellectual, social and natural — became inextricably linked
within a confused cultural matrix. Vitruvius was not simply observing a set of places; he was
living within spaces that, while having lost many of their explicit meanings over time,
contained within them implicit, albeit unclear, cultural codes for him to ponder. Vitruvius in
fact was not describing Roman architecture as it was; he was describing it as he wished it to be. There are a host of reasons to question the physical exactitude of his examples and subsequent models: The vantage point of a single individual living within a specific place at a particular moment in time was, and continues to be, limited at best. There are geographical and architectural inaccuracies that leave the reader wondering if Vitruvius actually saw much of what was inserted within the treatise. And Vitruvius would have generalized in order to arrive at the broad sets of tenets contained in the books.
The "looseness" characterizing the tenets of Vitruvius is precisely what has enabled
imaginative interpretations over the centuries. By including drawings within translations, the classical imagination has become fused with memories of what monuments should look like. Linked to this, translated versions of Vitruvius' treatise can be usurped in order to connect ruins more closely to Roman architectural ideals than they may have been in the first place.
The translation and annotation project of Jean Gardet and Dominique Bertin in the 1550s is an example of how the treatise of Vitruvius was attached, inextricably, to the antiquities of southern France. The habit of turning to the De Architectura in order to produce a body of archaeological knowledge and in turn to provide "proof for the architectural reconstruction of classical monuments has persisted. In the end, the monument can serve as confirmation
for the translated text, and the text re-confirms the monument. In Orange, the use of the treatise by architects has been retraced to show that the reconstructed theater does not correspond, in its rebuilt state, to that which would have stood in its place. Eventually, the habit of turning to Vitruvius was adapted to such an extent that it practically became invisible, with architects and archaeologists turning to it with little thought as to its contextual validity. This is probably why we see so few explicit references to its use in the
literature documenting the re-building of monuments; it is only by retracing field notes that the extent to which it was used, even relatively lately, can be assessed. At the same time, classical archaeology has — and continues to — direct its attention to deblayage, remaniements, consolidations and in time, la sauvegarde. The present-day impetus for these activities is closely connected to history, heritage and ultimately, the notion of patrimoine.
The difficulty today is that the more we re-build, whether it be for basic cultural consumption or within grander state agendas, the recourse to producing related bodies of knowledge to justify architectural plans has the potential to increase significantly. The understanding of classical architecture within the context of history and heritage must be met by a corresponding comprehension of its temporal, formal and social nature; Vitruvius' words, as I have stressed, do not necessarily depict a material architecture. Vitruvius' architect lived within an urban setting that was highly dynamic and not necessarily readily interpreted. And
while Republican spaces derived from a need for function, efficiency, beauty and
representation, they were not necessarily or completely redesigned each time they were reused; they were often modified to suit. Notions related to specific and ideal spaces were most probably stored within the minds of the multifaceted designers to be shaped according to particular sets of pre-existing cultural and built conditions as well as geographical settings. And to these, the craftspeople would have added personal interpretations. Today the problems arise when architects and archaeologists, eager to convince themselves and others of their theoretic, forget that we simply do not know what memories resided in the mind of
Roman architects.
|
Page generated in 0.0639 seconds