There has been a recent increase in the adoption of point-of-use (POU) household water filters as an alternative to untreated tap water or bottled water. POU filters certified for lead removal have recently been distributed by the hundreds of thousands in communities amid water lead crises, as a temporary solution to protect consumers from elevated water lead levels. This thesis rigorously examines the efficacy of POU lead certified filters in removing lead under a wide range of conditions, and evaluates premature clogging due to iron and associated impacts on the cost analysis of using filters instead of bottled water. In testing ten brands of POU devices against up to four different waters for lead removal, most devices consistently removed lead to below the 5 µg/L FDA bottled water standard. However, several failures were documented, including manufacturing flaws, premature clogging, and inconsistency between duplicate filters. When waters containing more difficult to treat lead particulates were synthesized, treated water often had lead concentrations greater than the 5 µg/L bottled water standard and sometimes were even over the 15 µg/L EPA action level. In some cases, less than 50% of the particulate lead was removed by the filter, thereby replicating some problems with these devices identified in the field. While POUs usually reduced water lead concentrations by at least 80%, a combination of manufacturing issues and difficult to treat waters can cause treated water to exceed expectations. Consumers often purchase POU devices to remove particles and lead in waters that also contain high iron, prompting studies to examine the role of iron on filter performance. When we exposed two brands of pour-through POUs to waters with both high lead and iron, lead removal performance was generally not compromised, as treated water typically had lead concentrations less than 5 µg/L. One case was observed in which lead passed through a set of filters at high levels in association with iron, confirming expectations that in some waters iron could cause formation of lead particulates that are difficult to remove. High levels of iron sometimes rapidly clogged the POU filters, preventing them from reaching their rated capacity and increasing operational costs and time to filter water. Specifically, 50% (3/6) of the filters tested clogged prematurely at an iron concentration of 0.37 mg/L, 66% (4/6) at 1 mg/L and 100% (6/6) at 20 mg/L. A cost analysis for POUs vs. bottled water demonstrated that in waters with higher iron, store-brand bottled water was often the more cost-effective option, especially when iron levels were significantly higher than the EPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (0.3 mg/L). The lower costs of bottled water in these situations was even more apparent if consumer time was factored into the analysis. / Master of Science / There has been a recent increase in the use of household water filters as an alternative to tap water or bottled water. Filters that are certified for lead removal have recently been distributed by the hundreds of thousands in communities amid water lead crises, as a temporary solution to protect consumers from elevated water lead levels. This thesis rigorously examines the effectiveness of these filters under a wide range of conditions. When tested against up to four different waters for lead removal, most filters consistently reduced lead to below the concentrations allowed in bottled water. In cases where the filters did not perform as expected, several filter failure modes were identified, including manufacturing flaws, filter clogging, and inconsistency between duplicate filters. In addition to these failures, when a water that contained particulate lead that was difficult to filter, as little as 50% of the lead was removed. While household filters often significantly reduce water lead concentrations, a combination of manufacturing issues and difficult to treat waters can cause poor performance. In many cases, consumers purchase filters to remove particles or lead in waters that also contain iron, which caused us to investigate the effect of iron on filter performance. When two brands of pour-through filters were tested against waters with both lead and iron, lead removal performance was generally not compromised. One exceptional case was observed where both high levels of lead and iron passed through the filters, leading us to believe that iron in some waters could create conditions where lead is more difficult to remove. In many cases, the presence of iron caused filters to dramatically slow down or clog. Premature clogging due to iron prevented filters from reaching their rated capacity and, in doing so, significantly increased cost and filter times. A cost analysis for filters vs. bottled water demonstrated that in waters with higher iron, store-brand bottled water was often the more cost-effective option, especially in waters with higher levels of iron. The lower costs of bottled water in these situations was even more apparent if consumer time was factored into the analysis.