1 |
Acellularization-induced changes in tensile properties are organ specificSchleifenbaum, Stefan, Prietzel, Torsten, Aust, Gabriela, Boldt, Andreas, Fritsch, Sebastian, Keil, Isabel, Koch, Holger, Möbius, Robert, Scheidt, Holger A., Wagner, Martin F. X., Hammer, Niels 08 June 2016 (has links) (PDF)
Introduction: Though xenogeneic acellular scaffolds are frequently used for surgical reconstruction, knowledge of their mechanical properties is lacking. This study compared the mechanical, histological and ultrastructural properties of various native and acellular specimens. Materials and methods: Porcine esophagi, ureters and skin were tested mechanically in a native or acellular condition, focusing on the elastic modulus, ultimate tensile stress and maximum strain. The testing protocol for soft tissues was standardized, including the adaption of the tissue’s water content and partial plastination to minimize material slippage as well as templates for normed sample dimensions and precise cross-section measurements. The native and acellular tissues were compared at the microscopic and ultrastructural level with a focus on type I collagens. Results: Increased elastic modulus and ultimate tensile stress values were quantified in acellular esophagi and ureters compared to the native condition. In contrast, these values were strongly decreased in the skin after acellularization. Acellularization-related decreases in maximum strain were found in all tissues. Type I collagens were well-preserved in these samples; however, clotting and a loss of cross-linking type I collagens was observed ultrastructurally. Elastins and fibronectins were preserved in the esophagi and ureters. A
loss of the epidermal layer and decreased fibronectin content was present in the skin. Discussion: Acellularization induces changes in the tensile properties of soft tissues. Some of these changes appear to be organ specific. Loss of cross-linking type I collagen may indicate increased mechanical strength due to decreasing transverse forces acting upon the scaffolds, whereas fibronectin loss may be related to decreased load-bearing capacity. Potentially, the alterations in tissue mechanics are linked to organ function and to the interplay of cells and the extracellular matrix, which is different in hollow organs when compared to skin.
|
2 |
Does facial soft tissue protect against zygomatic fractures?Hümpfner-Hierl, Heike, Bohne, Alexander, Schaller, Andreas, Wollny, Gert, Hierl, Thomas 16 June 2015 (has links) (PDF)
Introduction: Zygomatic fractures form a major entity in craniomaxillofacial traumatology. Few studies have dealt with biomechanical basics and none with the role of the facial soft tissues. Therefore this study should investigate, whether facial soft tissue plays a protecting role in lateral midfacial trauma.
|
3 |
Does facial soft tissue protect against zygomatic fractures?: results of a finite element analysisHümpfner-Hierl, Heike, Bohne, Alexander, Schaller, Andreas, Wollny, Gert, Hierl, Thomas January 2015 (has links)
Introduction: Zygomatic fractures form a major entity in craniomaxillofacial traumatology. Few studies have dealt with biomechanical basics and none with the role of the facial soft tissues. Therefore this study should investigate, whether facial soft tissue plays a protecting role in lateral midfacial trauma.
|
4 |
Acellularization-induced changes in tensile properties are organ specific: an in-vitro mechanical and structural analysis of porcine soft tissuesSchleifenbaum, Stefan, Prietzel, Torsten, Aust, Gabriela, Boldt, Andreas, Fritsch, Sebastian, Keil, Isabel, Koch, Holger, Möbius, Robert, Scheidt, Holger A., Wagner, Martin F. X., Hammer, Niels January 2016 (has links)
Introduction: Though xenogeneic acellular scaffolds are frequently used for surgical reconstruction, knowledge of their mechanical properties is lacking. This study compared the mechanical, histological and ultrastructural properties of various native and acellular specimens. Materials and methods: Porcine esophagi, ureters and skin were tested mechanically in a native or acellular condition, focusing on the elastic modulus, ultimate tensile stress and maximum strain. The testing protocol for soft tissues was standardized, including the adaption of the tissue’s water content and partial plastination to minimize material slippage as well as templates for normed sample dimensions and precise cross-section measurements. The native and acellular tissues were compared at the microscopic and ultrastructural level with a focus on type I collagens. Results: Increased elastic modulus and ultimate tensile stress values were quantified in acellular esophagi and ureters compared to the native condition. In contrast, these values were strongly decreased in the skin after acellularization. Acellularization-related decreases in maximum strain were found in all tissues. Type I collagens were well-preserved in these samples; however, clotting and a loss of cross-linking type I collagens was observed ultrastructurally. Elastins and fibronectins were preserved in the esophagi and ureters. A
loss of the epidermal layer and decreased fibronectin content was present in the skin. Discussion: Acellularization induces changes in the tensile properties of soft tissues. Some of these changes appear to be organ specific. Loss of cross-linking type I collagen may indicate increased mechanical strength due to decreasing transverse forces acting upon the scaffolds, whereas fibronectin loss may be related to decreased load-bearing capacity. Potentially, the alterations in tissue mechanics are linked to organ function and to the interplay of cells and the extracellular matrix, which is different in hollow organs when compared to skin.
|
Page generated in 0.0525 seconds