1 |
Comparative physical properties of several collections of the wheat streak mosaic virusKainski, John M. January 1955 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1955 K35 / Master of Science
|
2 |
Epidemiology of the resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus in perennial wheatHarrison, Leigh Ann, January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in plant pathology)--Washington State University, December 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 68-76).
|
3 |
The effect of wheat soilborne mosaic virus on agronomic characters of wheatNykaza, Scott M. January 1978 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1978 N94 / Master of Science
|
4 |
Possible factors influencing the transmission and control of the soil-borne wheat mosaic virus in KansasAddison, Emmanuel Appiah. January 1965 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1965 A22 / Master of Science
|
5 |
Transmission of soil-borne wheat mosaic virusPacumbaba, Rodulfo P. January 1966 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1966 P122 / Master of Science
|
6 |
Inheritance of resistance to wheat streak mosaic virus in wheat line KS06HW79Curato, John January 1900 (has links)
Master of Science / Department of Agronomy / Guorong Zhang / Guihua Bai / Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) is a disease that causes significant yield losses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Host resistance is the primary approach for control. KS06HW79 is a wheat line with WSMV resistance up to 21°C. To study the inheritance of resistance in KS06HW79, it was crossed with two WSMV-susceptible wheat genotypes, KS020638-M-5 and Brawl CL Plus. Parental lines, F₁, F₂, and check varieties were mechanically inoculated and evaluated for WSMV resistance at 21°C in growth chambers. The segregation pattern in two F₂ populations fit a one-recessive-gene model (1 resistant : 3 susceptible) and a dominant-suppression-epistasis model (3 resistant : 13 susceptible). To determine which model was a better fit, WSMV resistance was evaluated for F₂:₃ families generated from resistant F₂ plants in both crosses. Approximately two thirds of the F₂:₃ families in each cross showed segregation for WSMV resistance, suggesting that the dominant-suppression epistasis model better explained the WSMV resistance in KS06HW79. This model was also supported by two KS06HW79-derived doubled haploid populations, which had a segregation ratio of 1 resistant : 3 susceptible. Therefore, the WSMV resistance in KS06HW79 is likely controlled by two dominant genes, one of which is a suppressor.
|
7 |
Resistance of Agrotricums to wheat streak mosaicPfannenstiel, Mary Ann January 2011 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
8 |
Reaction of Parker and Eagle wheats to wheat streak mosaic virusYoung, John Robert January 2011 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
9 |
The epidemiology of wheat streak mosaic virusBorgman, Robert Peter. January 1959 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1959 B68
|
10 |
Interactions between the wheat curl mite, Aceria tosichella Keifer (Eriophyidae), and wheat streak mosaic virus and distribution of wheat curl mite biotypes in the fieldSiriwetwiwat, Benjawan. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006. / Title from title screen (site viewed May 23, 2007). PDF text: iv, 165 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 1.95Mb UMI publication number: AAT 3237062. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche formats.
|
Page generated in 0.0662 seconds