Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University, 2005. / Advisor: H. L. Gibbs. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, Riverside, 2009. / Includes abstract. Available via ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Title from first page of PDF file (viewed March 16, 2010). Includes bibliographical references. Also issued in print.

A controversy dating from the appearance of Altum's book, Der Vogel und sein Leben, 1868 (Mayr, 1935) is that of the biological function or functions of the territorial behavior in birds. However, attention was not focused upon this problem until the advent of Howard's book, Territory in Bird Life, published in 1920. In a general review of the problem Hinde (1956) discussed several functions of the territory and presented evidence both for and against their importance. The more important of these presumed functions are; (1) limitation of population density; (2) facilitation of pair formation and maintenance of the pair bond; (3) reduction in interference with reproductive activities by other members of the species; (4) provision of an adequate food supply for rearing the young; (5) reduction of loss to predators; (6) reduction of time spent in aggression; and (7) prevention of epidemics.

In this thesis my initial goal was to use yellow warblers to examine the effect of paternal care on female mate choice. I first examined whether mate choice based on paternal care could be considered adaptive. Paternal care was variable among males and important to female fitness, but, contrary to a previous report, male chest striping could not be used to predict paternal care. Females did not compensate for reductions of male parental care, which resulted in significantly reduced nestling growth. In chapter two I tested the idea that monogamy in birds is maintained because of the need for biparental care. I reduced the need of strict biparental care by providing pairs at some nests with supplemental food, and found that the main effect of supplemental food was on maternal, not paternal behaviour. The first two chapters suggest that males and females provide for their brood independently from each other, which is in disagreement with current models on the maintenance of biparental care. These models assume that any given factor must affect maternal and paternal care equally for biparental care to be maintained. In Chapter three I showed that the effects of brood size and nestling age on parental care are similar for both sexes. In Chapter four I deal with age-related changes in reproductive success and the possible effects on female mate choice. Age affected the likelihood of breeding in females, but only the time of breeding in males. These changes were accompanied by age-related increases in size in both sexes. These results raise the possibility of age-related increases in parental ability, and female preference for older males.

No description available.

Phenotypic traits that vary geographically within species are commonly assumed to represent local adaptations to different environments. In order for local adaptation to evolve by natural selection, three conditions must be met: (1) traits must vary geographically, (2) local variants of traits must provide a fitness advantage (increased survival or reproductive success) within the local environment, and (3) local variants of traits must be heritable. In chapter two, we review evidence for local adaptation in birds. Geographic variation among populations is nearly ubiquitous, yet experimental tests of the fitness advantages of local trait variants are rare among populations of birds, presumably because of the difficulties in transporting individuals between populations. Thirty-seven studies have tested the heritability of among population variation in traits. Thirty-three of the 37 studies found some degree of heritability of variation among populations, consistent with traits diverging in response to natural selection. In chapter three, we experimentally test the fitness consequences of divergent nest morphologies of Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia) using reciprocal nest transplant experiments between a temperate and subarctic site in Canada. Yellow Warblers breeding at our subarctic site build larger nests constructed with more insulative materials than Yellow Warblers breeding at our temperate site, and these differences are the result of different nest building behaviours. Temperate nests transplanted to subarctic sites experienced significantly colder temperatures, and tended to suffer higher egg and nestling mortality due to climatic conditions (cold temperatures), than locally transplanted subarctic nests. Adult females breeding in subarctic sites that received temperate nests changed their incubation behaviours by taking shorter recesses than females who received locally transplanted subarctic nests. In contrast, subarctic nests transplanted to our temperate site showed no changes in nest temperature, fledgling success, or parental behaviour during incubation. We suggest that divergent selective pressures acting on Yellow Warblers in subarctic and temperate environments results in different nest building behaviours. Cold temperatures in our subarctic site likely favour increased investment in larger, insulative nests, whereas warmer temperatures at our temperate sites likely favour reduced investment in nest building, and consequently smaller nests. / Thesis (Master, Biology) -- Queen's University, 2010-09-28 13:16:38.686

No description available.

No description available.

The proximate causes triggering nest abandonment are unclear for most species, including the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia), which abandons nests parasitized by cowbirds (via burial or desertion). Cowbird parasitism and rejection of parasitism are costly to some hosts; therefore cues affecting their responses have important evolutionary implications. Manipulative experiments showed that experimentally adding a cowbird egg elicited similar rejection frequencies (2008: 31.8%; 2009: 26.1%) as naturally laid eggs (2008: 27.1%; 2009: 20.0%). In 2008, interaction with an egg-removing model increased the probability of abandonment and the most aggressive individuals were more likely to bury the model cowbird egg. In 2009, eggs added to nests before sunrise were rejected at a frequency (29.7%) similar to eggs added to nests after sunrise (22.9%). Warblers returning to nests after egg addition peered significantly longer at their clutch than at control nests, shuffled their bodies more frequently when on the eggs and spent more time probing eggs with their bill once settled on their parasitized clutch. Furthermore, although non-mimetic blue eggs were not abandoned significantly more frequently than cowbird eggs (blue 31.1% versus cowbird 21.4%), only blue eggs were ejected from some nests. Thus, warblers use both tactile and visual cues to detect the presence of a parasitic egg in their nest. Eggs added to nests were not rejected at a lower frequency than naturally parasitized nests, as was recorded in a previous study. It is difficult to know whether this increase in abandonment of experimental eggs is due to phenotypic plasticity, genetic changes, or other factors. Egg recognition abilities may have changed because I have shown that the warblers’ behaviour changes before versus after egg addition, whereas no changes were recorded in an earlier study. Finally, not all individuals that buried eggs for the first time in 2009 (21.4%) buried again after being re-parasitized (5.3%), when less time remained in the breeding season relative to the first parasitism event. This suggests that egg rejection and host responsiveness in warblers, and likely other avian hosts that use abandonment as a form of rejection, is affected by environmental cues which may act as genetic expressers.

The proximate causes triggering nest abandonment are unclear for most species, including the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia), which abandons nests parasitized by cowbirds (via burial or desertion). Cowbird parasitism and rejection of parasitism are costly to some hosts; therefore cues affecting their responses have important evolutionary implications. Manipulative experiments showed that experimentally adding a cowbird egg elicited similar rejection frequencies (2008: 31.8%; 2009: 26.1%) as naturally laid eggs (2008: 27.1%; 2009: 20.0%). In 2008, interaction with an egg-removing model increased the probability of abandonment and the most aggressive individuals were more likely to bury the model cowbird egg. In 2009, eggs added to nests before sunrise were rejected at a frequency (29.7%) similar to eggs added to nests after sunrise (22.9%). Warblers returning to nests after egg addition peered significantly longer at their clutch than at control nests, shuffled their bodies more frequently when on the eggs and spent more time probing eggs with their bill once settled on their parasitized clutch. Furthermore, although non-mimetic blue eggs were not abandoned significantly more frequently than cowbird eggs (blue 31.1% versus cowbird 21.4%), only blue eggs were ejected from some nests. Thus, warblers use both tactile and visual cues to detect the presence of a parasitic egg in their nest. Eggs added to nests were not rejected at a lower frequency than naturally parasitized nests, as was recorded in a previous study. It is difficult to know whether this increase in abandonment of experimental eggs is due to phenotypic plasticity, genetic changes, or other factors. Egg recognition abilities may have changed because I have shown that the warblers’ behaviour changes before versus after egg addition, whereas no changes were recorded in an earlier study. Finally, not all individuals that buried eggs for the first time in 2009 (21.4%) buried again after being re-parasitized (5.3%), when less time remained in the breeding season relative to the first parasitism event. This suggests that egg rejection and host responsiveness in warblers, and likely other avian hosts that use abandonment as a form of rejection, is affected by environmental cues which may act as genetic expressers.