The basics of visualisations in the context of Cultural Heritage are not broadly defined. But this is the precondition to find out suitable and practical strategies to document and manage the knowledge contained therein. For this, the paper focusses the properties, potentials and typologies of Cultural Heritage visualisations related to application fields and possibilities as well as documentation strategies, creation process and methodology.
The paper starts with a theoretical overview of the properties and potential of visualisation related to the usability in the context of Cultural Heritage. On this basis the correlation between application possibilities and the three application fields - research, transfer of knowledge and preservation - will be discussed.
In a second part, the paper identifies the similarities and differences of typical working processes and methodologies by the study “Investigation of 3D modelling workflows in CH with the object of development of key concepts and definitions”. This is a subproject of the project COSCH with the purpose to create a framework called COSCHKR as an international and interdisciplinary platform for state-of-the-art documentation of Cultural Heritage. For this, the main topic of the study was the analysis, evaluation and comparison of thirty different 3D projects of three institutes. It was possible to define different types of CH visualization and framework of a working process.
Third topic is the documentation and management of knowledge of such visualisation in the field of Cultural Heritage. The paper compares three current research projects and points out commons and differences of the different strategies.
At the end, a synthesis gives a first idea for common strategies and best practice guidelines of Cultural Heritage visualisation related to the process, methodology and documentation.
Purpose – Find out general strategies to document and manage knowledge
Design/methodology/approach – Based on investigation and evaluation of different projects.
Originality/value – Most of the projects are a special application for one research question, this methodology raises a common claim.
Practical implications – The outcomes of the investigation is a basis for further practical applications with a high range of usability.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:33982 |
Date | 15 May 2019 |
Creators | Mieke, Pfarr-Harfst |
Contributors | Technische Universität Dresden |
Publisher | TUDpress |
Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:conferenceObject, info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject, doc-type:Text |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Relation | 978-3-95908-144-3, urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-338644, qucosa:33864 |
Page generated in 0.0012 seconds