<p>The following essay investigates emission rights accounting. Presently there are several methods through which emission rights can be accounted for by companies. The rights can for instance be valued at fair value or nominal value and as marketable securities or intangible assets; due to a lack of consensus or clear standards companies use these or other accounting methods to value their rights. This essay investigates whether there is a relationship between the company’s choice of accounting method, the key ratio number of owned emission rights/total assets, the accounting firm used and the yearly result as a sign of earnings management.</p><p>Through a quantitative study based on questioners and numbers from the annual reports three hypothesis are tested. The results show that no significant results can be found for either hypothesis, indicating that the companies choice of accounting method is not affected by the key ratio, the accounting firm used or earnings management, even though the last hypothesis may have some relevance.</p><p> </p>
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:uu-126819 |
Date | January 2010 |
Creators | Röstberg, Maria, Spång, Jenny, Tengvar, Viktoria |
Publisher | Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies |
Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
Language | Swedish |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds