Submitted by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2014-09-25T18:57:04Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
Bruno de Souza Barreto - 2008 - Dissertação.pdf: 2633509 bytes, checksum: 9a1040f27931399225f28b393e640b6e (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-09-26T11:43:42Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2
Bruno de Souza Barreto - 2008 - Dissertação.pdf: 2633509 bytes, checksum: 9a1040f27931399225f28b393e640b6e (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-09-26T11:43:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Bruno de Souza Barreto - 2008 - Dissertação.pdf: 2633509 bytes, checksum: 9a1040f27931399225f28b393e640b6e (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008-06-06 / Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa - FUNAPE / The units of conservation are main strategy adopted by the rulers to guarantee
that the negative effects of the socioeconomic development reach less the
biodiversity. recent researches have been trying to outline the problem
through reserve selection that seek larger representativeness of the goals of
conservation (in general some estimador of the biodiversity as the species) in
terms of a smaller number of areas as possible. in the last 50 years the cerrado
is going by transformations in their natural landscapes due to the progress of
the modern agriculture and of the livestock. due to that, the objective of that
work was to define priority areas network for conservation of bats in terms of
five conservation sceneries differents. the generated nets were restricted by
socioeconomic cost, presence of cave and a cost that considers the previous
two cost. the results revealed main features of analyses of complementarity:
multiple solutions, flexibility of the nets, and influence of the rarity of the
species for the definition of groups starting from the pattern of rarity. the
costs were important for definition of nets that avoided as much conflicts of
conservation as prioritized the species in areas of cave. / As unidades de conservação são principal estratégia adotada pelos
governantes para garantir que os efeitos negativos do desenvolvimento
socioeconômico atinjam menos a biodiversidade. recentes pesquisas têm tentado
contornar o problema através de seleção de reservas que visam maior
representatividade das metas de conservação (em geral algum estimador da
biodiversidade como as espécies) em termos de um menor número de áreas quanto
possível. nos últimos 50 anos o cerrado vem passando por transformações em
suas paisagens naturais em decorrência do avanço da agricultura moderna e da
pecuária. os morcegos são também ameaçados e em decorrência disso, o objetivo
desse trabalho foi definir redes de reservas regionais prioritárias para
conservação de morcegos em termos de cinco cenários de conservação
diferentes. as redes geradas foram restringidas por custo socioeconomico,
custo presença de caverna e custo que podera os dois anteriores. os
resultados reelaram as principais caracteísticas de análises de
complementaridade: multiplas soluçoes, flexibilidade das redes, influência da
raridade das espécies pela definição de grupos a partir do padrão de raridade.
os custos foram importantes para definição de redes que evitaram tanto
conflitos de conservação quanto priorizaram as espécies em regioes de
caverna.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/3178 |
| Date | 06 June 2008 |
| Creators | Barreto, Bruno de Souza |
| Contributors | Bini, Luis Mauricio |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal de Goiás, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução (ICB), UFG, Brasil, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - ICB (RG) |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | Portuguese |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFG, instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás, instacron:UFG |
| Rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/, info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -5361682850774351271, 600, 600, 600, 600, -3872772117827373404, 3263499605295365002, -8644727573657825680, Abbit, R., Scott, J.M., Wilcove, D.S., 2000. The geography of vulnerability: incorporating species geography and human development patterns into conservation planning. Biological Conservation. 96, 169-175. Aguirre, L.F., Lens, L., van Damme, R., et al. 2003. Consistency and variation in the bat assemblages inhabiting two forest islands within a neotropical savanna in Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 19, 367-374. Altmoons, M. e Henle, K. 2007. Differences in characteristic of the reserve network selection using population data versus habitat surrogates. Biodiversity Conservation. 16, 113-135. Anacleto, T.C.S., Ferreira, A.A., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., et al. 2005. Selection of areas of ecological importance through remote sensing and mathematics optimization: a case study in the municipality of Cocalinho, Mato Grosso. Acta Amazonica. 35 (4), 437-444. Andelman, S., Ball, I., Davis, F. et al. 1999. SITES v. 1.0: an analytical toolbox for designing ecoregional conservation portfolios. Technical report, The Nature Conservancy. <http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/tnc/toolbox.html> Andelman, S.J. & Willig, M.R. 2003. Present patterns and future prospects for biodiversity in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology Letters. 6, 818-824. Araújo, M, B., Rahbek, C. 2007. Conserving biodiversity in a world of conflicts. Journal of Biogeography. 34. 199-200. Araújo, M. B. 2003. The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Global Ecology & Biogeography 12:5-12. 58 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Araújo, M.B., Williams, P.H., Turner, A. 2002. A sequential approach to minimize threats within selected conservation areas. Biodiversity and Conservation. 11. 1011-1024. Balmford, A., Moore, J.L., Brooks, T., et al. 2001. Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science. 291, 2616-2619. Barreto, B.S., Oliveira, G., Pinto, M.P., et al. 2008. Riqueza de espécies de emberizídeos e conflito de conservação no Cerrado brasileiro. Acta Scientiarum. 30(1), 67-72. Bini, L. M., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Rangel, T. L. F. V. B., et al. 2006. Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot. Diversity and Distributions. 12, 475- 482. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 1995/96. Disponível em: <http://www2.ibge.gov.br/pub/Censos/Censo_Agropecuario_1995_96/>. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2004. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 2000. Disponível em: <http://www2.ibge.gov.br/pub/Censos/Censo_Demografico_2000/>. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2004. Brown, J.H, Mchlman, D.W. e Stevens, G.C. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology. 76, 2028-2043. Cabeza, M. e Moilanen, A. 2001. Design of reserve network and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 16, 242-248. Cardillo, M., Purvis, A, Sechrest, W., et al. 2004. Human population density and Extiction Risk in the world’s carnivores. Plos biology. 2, 9-13. 59 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Carwardine, J., Rochester, W.A., Richardson, K.S., et al. 2007. Conservation planning with irreplaceability: Does the method matter? Biodiversity Conservation. 16, 245-258. CECAV, Centro Nacional de Estudo Proteção e Manejo de Cavernas, Instituto de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Renováveis (IBAMA). Disponível em: <http://www.ibama.gov.br/cecav/index.php?id_menu=228> Acessado em: 10 ago 2007. Chown, S. L., Van Rensburg, B. J., Gaston, K. J., et al. 2003. Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecological Applications. 13, 1233-1241. Clarke, F.M., Pio, D.V., Racey, P.A.. 2005. A comparison of logging systems and bat diversity in the neotropics. Conservation Biology. 19(4), 1194-1204. Couto, L.F., Terribile, L.C., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. 2007. Padrões espaciais e conservação da diversidade de serpentes do bioma Cerrado. Acta Scientiarum, Biologiacal Science. 29(1), 65-73. Diniz Filho, J. A. F., Bini, L.M., Pinto, M.P., et al. 2007. Conservation Biogeography of Anurans in Brazilian Cerrado. Biodiversity and Conservation. 16, 997-1008. Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., Pinto, M.P., et al. 2006. Anuran species richness, complementarity and conservation conflicts in Brazilian Cerrado. Acta Oecologica. 29, 9-15. Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., Vieira, C.M., et al. 2004. Spatial patterns in species richness and priority areas for conservation of anurans in the Cerrado region, Central Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia, 25, 63–75 60 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Estrada, A. e Coates-Estrada, R. Bats in continuous forest fragmentation and in an agricultural mosaic habitat-island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biological Conservation. 103, 237-245. Faith, D. P. 2001. Overlap of species richness and development-opportunity does not imply conflict. Science 293:1591-1592. Faith, D. P. 2002. Those complementarity analyses do not reveal extent of conservation conflict in Africa. Science 293:1591-1592. Faith, D.P., Carter, G., Cassis, G., et al. 2003. Complemantarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algotithims for conservation. Environmental Science & Policy. 6, 311-328. Gaston, K. J., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Van-Resburg, B. J., et al. 2001. Complementary representation and zones of ecological transirion. Ecology Letters, 4: 4-9. Gaston, K.J. 1994. Rarity. 204 pp. Chapman & Hall. London, Inglaterra. Gaston, K.J., Rodrigues, A.S.L. 2003. Reserve selection in regions with poor biological data. Conservation Biology. 17, 188-195. Giannini, N.B., Kalko, E.K.V. 2004. Trophic structure in a large assemblage of phyllostomid bats in Panama. Oikos. 105, 209-220. Gorresen, P.M., Willig, M.R. 2004. Landscape Responses Of Bats To Habitat Fragmentation In Atlantic Forest Of Paraguay. Journal of Mammalogy. 85(4), 688- 697. Grand, J., Cummings, M.P., Rebelo, T.G., et al. 2007. Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks. Ecology Letters. 10, 364- 374. 61 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Hawkins, B.A., Porter, E.E., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. 2003a. Productivity and history as predictors of the latidudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology. 84, 1608-1623. Hawkins, B.A.; Field, R.; Cornell, H.V.; et al. 2003b. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology. 84, 3105-3117. Huston, M. A. 2001. People and biodiversity in Africa. Science. 293, 1591-1592. IUCN. 2000. Red Lis of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Suiça. Jackson, D.A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal componets analysis: A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology. 74, 2204-2214. Kaufman, D. M., Willig, M.R. 1998. Latitudinal patterns of mammalian species richness in the New World: the effects of sampling method and faunal group. Journal of Biogeography. 25, 795-805. Klink, C. A. e Moreira, A. G. 2002. Past and current human ocupation, and land use. In: The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna (ed. por P.S. Oliveira e R.J. Marques), pp. 69-88. Columbia University Press, Nova York. Klink, C. A; Macedo, R. H. & Muelller, C. C.1995. De grão em grão o cerrado perde espaço. Cerrado - Impactos do processo de ocupação. WWF/PRÓ-CER, Brasília. 66 p. Klink, C.A. e Machado, R.B. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology. 707-713. Lopéz-González, C. 2004. Ecological zoogeography of the bats of Paraguay. Journal of Biogoegraphy. 31, 33-45. 62 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Luck, G. W., Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.C, et al. 2004. Alleviating spatial conflicts between people and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:182-186. Main, M. B., Roka, F. M., Noss, R. F. 1999. Evaluating costs of conservation. Conservation Biology. 13, 1262-1272. Manly, B.F.J. Multivariate statistical methods. A primer. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994. 224p. Margules, C. R. e Pressey, R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405, 243-253. Margules, C. R., Nicholls, A. O., Pressey, R. L. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological Conservation. 43, 63-76. Marinho-Filho, J., Rodrigues, F. H. G., Juarez, K. M. 2002. The Cerrado Mammals: Diversity, Ecology, and Natural History. In: Oliveira, M. S., Marquis, R. J. (eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of Neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York. 266-284 pp. McKee, J. K., Sciulli, P. W., Fooce, C.D., et al. 2003. Forecasting global biodiversity threats associated with human population growth. Biological Conservation. 115, 161-164. Medellín, R.A., Equihua, M., Amim, M.A. 2000. Bat diversity and abundance as indicators of disturbance in neotropical rain forests. Conservation Biology. 14(6), 1666-1675. Mittermeier, R.A., Fonseca, G.A.B, Rylands, A.B., et al. 2005. A brief history of biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology. 19(3), 601-607 MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2000. Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza -SNUC: lei No. 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. 63 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Moore, L., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., et al. 2001. Complementarity analyses reveal extent of conservation conflict in Africa. Science. 293, 1591-1592. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., et al. 2000. Biodiversity hotspot for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858. Noss, R. F., Carrol, C., Vance-Borland, K., et al. 2002. A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Conservation Biology. 16, 895-908. Oliveira, G, Barreto, B.S., Pinto, M.P., et al. 2007. Padrões espaciais de diversidade da Família Emberizidae (Aves: Passeriformes) e seleção de áreas prioritárias para conservação no Cerrado. Lundiana. 8(2), 97-106. Oliveira, G. 2008. Teoria unificada da Macroecologia e seleção de áreas prioritárias para conservação no Cerrado brasileiro. Dissertação de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução. ICB/UFG. Patterson, B. D., Ceballos, G., Sechrest, W., et al. 2005. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 2.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA. Pimm, S. L., Ayres, M., Balmford, A., et al. 2001. Can we Defy Nature's End? Science. 293, 2207-2208. Pinto, M. P., Mathias, P. V. C., Blamires, D., et al. 2007. Selecting priority areas to conserve Psittacines in the Brazilian cerrado: minimizing human-conservation conflicts. Bird Conservation International. 17, 13-22. Pinto, M.P, Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., et al. 2008. Biodiversity Surrogate Groups And Conservation Priority Areas: Birds Of The Brazilian Cerrado. Diversity and Distribution. 14, 78-86. 64 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., Solow, A. R., et al. 2000. Choosing reserve network with imcomplete species information. Biological Conservation, 94, 1-10. Porches, S. 2005. The World Biogeographical Regions: cluster Analyses Based On Bat Distribution. Journal Biogoeography. 32, 607-614. Possingham, H., Ball, I. e Andelman, S. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative methods for conservation biology (ed. por S. Ferson e M. Burgman), pp. 291-306. Springer-Verlag, Nova York. Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, R. I., Vane-Wright, R. I., Williams, P. H. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution: 8: 124-128. Pressey, R. L., Johnson, I. R., Wilson, P. D. 1994. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reserve goal. Biodiversity Conservation. 3, 242-262. Rangel, T.L.F.V.B., Bini, L.M., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., et al. 2007. Human development and biodiversity conservation in Brazilian Cerrado. Applied Geography, 27: 14-27. Rodrigues, A. S. L. e Gaston, K. J. 2002. Rarity and Conservation Planning across Geopolitical Units. Conservation Biology, 16, 674-682. Rodrigues, A.S., Cerdeira, J.O., Gaston, K.J. 2000. Flexibility efficiency and accountability: Adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography. 23, 565-574. Rodrigues, A.S.L. e Brooks, T.M. 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 713-737. Royal Society. 2003. Measuring biodiversity for conservation. Document 11/03. 65 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Sala, O. E. Chapin III, F.S. Armesto J.J., et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 287,1770-1774. Sazima, I., Vizotto, L.D., Tasddei, V.A. 1978. Uma nova espécie de Lonchophylla da serra do cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Revista Brasiliera de Biologia. 38(1), 81-89. Silva, J. F., Farinas, M. R., Felfili, J. M., et al. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in Cerrado region of Brazil. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 536- 548. Stevens, R.D., López-González, C., Presley, S. J. 2007. Geographical ecology of Paraguayan bats: spatial integration and metacommunity structure of interacting assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology. 76, 1086-1093. Stoner, K.E. 2005. Phillostomid bat community and abundance in two contrasting tropical dry forests. Biotropica. 37(4), 591-599. Taddei, V. A., Vizotto, L. D., Sazima, I. 1983. Uma nova espécie de Lonchophylla do Brasil e chave para a identificação das espécies do gênero (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Ciência e Cultura. 35, 625-629. Vane-Wright R.I., C.J. Humphries, P.H. Williams. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55:235–254. Whittaker RH, Willis KJ, Field R. 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal Biogeography. 28, 453- 70. Whittaker, R. J., Araújo, M. B., Jepson, P., et al. 2005. Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distribution. 11, 3-23. Willig, M.R. e C.P. Bloch. 2006. Latitudinal gradients of species richness: a test of the geographic area hypothesis. Oikos 112:163-173. 66 Barreto, S.B. Biogeografia da Conservação de Morcegos do Cerrado Brasileiro Willig, M.R., Kaufman, D.M., Stevens, R.D. 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 273- 309. Willig, M.R., Presley, S.J. Owen, R.D., et al. 2000. Composition And Structure Of Bat Assemblages In Paraguay: A Subtropica-Temperate Interface. Journal of Mammalogy. 8(2), 386-401. Willis, K.J., Whittaker, R.J. 2002. Species diversity-Scale Matters. Science. 295, 1245-1248. |
Page generated in 0.0032 seconds