本文的目的是探討《淮南子》中的「治道」問題，共分九部分。緒論部分的主要目的在於：闡述先秦西漢的「治道」思想；給予《淮南子》中的「治道」思想以思想史意義上的定位；闡述《淮南子》的語境中哪些概念或問題與「治道」有關，並簡述它們之間的聯繫；簡述本文所運用的唐君毅《哲學概論》中的四種方法論思維：「純理的推演法」、「比較法」、「超越的反省法」、「批判法」。第一章乃是對《淮南子》一書基本情況的簡介，以及對《淮南子》政治哲學相關研究文獻的批評。接下來的第二章至第六章分別探討與「治道」問題有關的五個方面：「適情」、「無爲」、禍福問題、儒學問題、「制禮」問題。第七章借鑑《淮南子》中的「治道」思想，對牟宗三與徐復觀的「治道」觀進行反思。最後一章（第八章）一方面是總結本文的寫作線索和思路，另一方面是藉助關於胡適、《淮南子》、蔣介石的史實，指出《淮南子》中的「治道」的部分思想在近現代仍具影響。This dissertation attempts to explore "the Dao of the rulership" in the Huainanzi. It consists of an introduction and eight chapters. The introduction offers an account of the concept of "the Dao of the rulership" in the Chinese intellectual history in the Pre-Qin period and the Western Han Dynasty. Chapter I offers a literature review of important works in the Huainanzi scholarship related to the topic. Chapters II to VI cover five sub-topics regarding "the Dao of the rulership" as shown in the Huainanzi, which includes emotion, non-action, the dialectic of fortune and misfortune, Confucian rulership, and rituals of governance. Chapter VII gives a critical reflection of the ideas of rulership offered by New Confucian scholars represented by Mou Zongsan and Xu Fuguan. Chapter VIII, the last chapter, offers a summary; it also discusses rulership in the Huainanzi in terms of its modern relevance. Methodologically speaking, the research adopts the fourfold method of textual analysis mentioned by Tang Junyi, namely, theoretical and analytical extrapolation, comparison, transcendental reflection, and critical assessment.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:hkbu.edu.hk/oai:repository.hkbu.edu.hk:etd_oa-1595 |
| Date | 23 November 2018 |
| Creators | 張羽軍, |
| Publisher | HKBU Institutional Repository |
| Source Sets | Hong Kong Baptist University |
| Language | Chinese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | Open Access Theses and Dissertations |
Page generated in 0.0289 seconds