台灣的競爭優勢在於為數眾多的企業，彼此在產品供應鏈上有著強烈互補性與製程連貫性，惟彼此間並無有效供應鏈管理，而使彼此發揮綜效。目標成本具備有效管理、整合供應鏈及較少成本中心之優勢，其在日本發展成熟且應用範圍相當廣泛，而台灣卻甚少企業了解及採用。探究其原因在於台灣探討該制度導入過程之研究或文獻相對稀少，而導致企業界裹足不前。
因此，本研究以個案研究方式對手錶產業之個案公司進行研究，由組織管理型態、目標成本管理程序、與供應商之關係三方面探討目標成本制導入過程中可能產生之問題及解決方法。研究結果指出組織型態之改變可使目標成本制順利導入，跨功能團隊亦能成功縮短新產品開發時間。另外，採行合適之目標成本管理程序能有效降低新產品開發成本，供應商關係亦因目標成本制之導入而與個案公司緊密結合，進而達到整合供應鏈之效果。 / The advantage of Taiwan in competition is that there are a lot of companies which are complemented in supply chain. However, there isn’t an effective management to bring these companies into full play. Target Costing can integrate and manage supply chain cost-effectively, and is popular in Japanese enterprise. The reason is that there aren’t enough references and research to introduce the management costing system in Taiwan.
Accordingly, this research is a case study of the watch industry. It explains how to introduce Target Costing into enterprise in three aspects: organization management, target costing procedure, and the relationship with supplier. The result indicates that the change of organization can ease the introduction of Target Costing, and the cross-functional teams help to reduce the duration of new product development. If the company adopts appropriate Target Costing procedure, it can also reduce the product development cost. Target Costing can also strengthen the relationship with supplier, which results in a thoroughly integrated supply chain.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0096353014 |
| Creators | 張為宗 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds