台灣與大陸地區分隔長達六十餘年，在長期分治下，雖毗鄰而居，近在咫尺，但兩岸政策取向、法律制度、社會現狀差異甚大，惟因兩岸人民在血緣、語言上的特殊關係，逐漸朝開放邁進，隨著1987年7月15日我方政府宣告解嚴，同年11月2日開放赴大陸探親，加上近年來更開放大陸人民來台觀光，兩岸民間交流日趨頻繁，卻也衍生出諸如走私黑槍、毒品、人民偷渡、電信詐欺及擄人勒贖等跨境犯罪案件，此外，許多刑事犯及幫派犯罪組織分子在台犯罪後紛紛潛逃大陸或與大陸黑幫相互串連從事不法犯罪活動，對兩岸治安造成相當重大的影響。
兩岸合作共同打擊犯罪機制之建立，兩岸地區官方、半官方機構、學術團體、專家學者不斷強調其重要性與急迫性，且多次表達合作之意願，迄今雖已簽訂兩岸共同打擊犯罪協議，授權已然明確化，但在實務操作上欲達到雙方理想目標仍有一段相當長遠的路。本研究主要係針對兩岸跨境犯罪，分析其犯罪模式與兩岸偵查制度，說明現行雙方在合作所面臨法律及實務上之問題癥結，並具體整理筆者長期執行兩岸共同打擊犯罪之合作困境，希冀藉由學術理論為基礎，分析現行兩岸偵查實務癥結，以有效解決當前兩岸警方共同面臨的偵查困境。
本文經由兩岸刑事訴訟偵查制度之剖析，發現兩岸警方在偵查主體上地位的不同，導致刑案偵辦於偵查開端、偵查程序及得施行之手段等方面均有所差異，而此差異，極易對雙方在情資傳遞、人犯移交及證據蒐集等認知上產生落差。此外，藉由兩岸共同打擊犯罪之背景、意義、原則及影響最深遠的兩項協議：2005年雙方在澳門建立「兩岸警方共同打擊犯罪聯繫機制」、2009年「第三次江陳會談簽訂海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」之闡述分析，輔以兩岸警方人員之深度訪談，進一步瞭解到雙方共同打擊犯罪所面臨的實務困境，最後嚐試從聯繫平臺的建立、情資的交流通報、犯罪證據的調查蒐證、要犯的查緝遣返及共同合作掃蕩等方面提出未來兩岸警方共同打擊跨境犯罪可行之偵查合作模式，以供後續研究及提供相關單位參考。 / In spite of the great differences of social, political and legal system between the two sides of Taiwan Strait after more than six decades of cut-off tie, the cross-strait policy is relaxed step by step based on a shared language and cultural relationship. Our government declared martial law ended on July 15, 1987, and allowed people in mainland China to visit Taiwan in recent years. As the non-government exchange is becoming more frequent, it caused serious cross-border crime like gun and drug smuggling, illegal immigration, telecom fraud, and kidnapping for ransom. Furthermore, many criminals and organized gangsters fled to mainland China and engaged in illegal activities, which hurts the social order of the two sides very much.
Though the Cross-Strait Agreement on Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance was signed, it still has a long way in practice to reach the ideal. This study focuses mainly on analyzing criminal modus operandi and investigation system of Cross-Strait criminal activities, the problems of ongoing cooperation in practice and law, and then proposing proper proposal on the future cooperation of cross-strait crime-fighting which aims to solve the difficult point between the two sides.
This thesis is divided into five chapters: Chapter one is the introduction about study motive, purpose, range, and research methods. Chapter two is to analyze and compare the criminal procedure by dissecting the different subjects of investigation, leading to varied beginnings, processes, and methods, thus influence perception of information exchanges, repatriation and evidence collecting. Chapter three is the history of cooperation against crime between the two sides, which mainly introduces its backgrounds. That is, principle and two significant agreements: one is the institutionalized joint crime-fighting cooperation mechanism between the two sides police in 2005, the other is the Cross-Strait Agreement on Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance signed in 2009.
Chapter four is to analyze varied types of cross-border crime and emphasize the importance and urgency of joint crime-fighting. Chapter five is the conclusion which proposes future cooperation modes in the aspects of communicated platform building, information exchange, evidence collecting and repatriation etc, and offers follow-up studies and the authorities concerned for reference.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0097981002 |
| Creators | 許瑞山 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds