This thesis explores conflict in reasoning using a mouse-tracking paradigm that measures participants' instantaneous attraction towards competing response options. It focuses on two kinds of conflict: between competing sources of information in inductive reasoning, and between "Type 1" and "Type 2" processes in Dual Process accounts of reasoning. The mouse-tracking data reveal under what circumstances conflict occurs, at what points in time participants are influenced by different factors, and something of the qualitative nature of this conflict.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:709851 |
| Date | January 2016 |
| Creators | Travers, Eoin |
| Publisher | Queen's University Belfast |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.015 seconds