Return to search

我國國家檔案徵集政策之研究 / A Study on National Archives Acquisition Policy in Taiwan

本研究主要探討我國正面臨國營事業民營化過程中可能造成產業文化資產流失,以及因應未來行政院組織法通過後單位之裁併,檔案保存可能面臨潛在之風險與危機,亟需一套完備的國家檔案徵集政策以資遵循,除將提供徵集工作之依據外,並可釐清檔案徵集主題之優先順序,以及控制入藏國家檔案之質與量,使徵集工作得以按部就班,系統化的方式進行,亦可做為我國國家檔案核心館藏建立之最佳指導方針。

本研究使用「文獻分析法」與「深度訪談法」進行研究,除了探討我國國家檔案鑑選與移轉策略,以及擬定國家檔案徵集政策應考慮因素等之外,並對美國、英國、澳洲及加拿大等四國對國家檔案徵集工作推動現況,加以綜合歸納與比較。

本研究以檔案主管機關(檔案管理局)、中央層級機關(國防部、外交部、教育部及內政部)、歷史檔案典藏單位(國史館台灣文獻館、國立故宮博物院、中央研究院近代史研究所檔案館及中央研究院歷史語言研究所)及地方政府檔案管理單位(台北市政府、高雄市政府、嘉義縣政府檔案中心及宜蘭縣史館)等四個層級13個單位為主要訪談研究對象,深入瞭解上述單位檔案管理情形、檔案典藏特色、保存現況及單位具永久保存價值,符合移轉檔案管理局成為國家檔案之統計數量,及對國家檔案徵集政策制定之觀點與建議,並就我國國家檔案徵集內容與優先順序,以及有關國家檔案對於社會價值、功能之看法,並針對研究對象抽樣訪談了26位一般檔案使用者,以瞭解其檔案使用經驗及對國家檔案利用需求、國家檔案徵集內容建議與看法,以期做為我國擬訂國家檔案徵集政策之參考。

根據研究結果,本研究提出六點結論為:(一)國家檔案典藏質量亟待強化;(二)具風險之永久保存價值檔案亟待移轉;(三)國家檔案之定位未明確化;(四)我國目前尚未興建國家檔案館,無法大規模徵集國家檔案入藏;(五)徵集政策及審選標準欠缺,影響國家檔案品質;(六)國家檔案審選耗時費力,降低檔案移轉效率。
根據研究結果,本研究提出十點建議為:(一)訂定國家檔案徵集政策;(二)建立國家檔案委託代管之機制;(三)建立國家檔案審選標準,充實國家檔案典藏內涵;(四)加速國家檔案的徵集,以滿足民眾需求;(五)徵集國家檔案應考量檔案內容之連貫與完整性,避免以主題方式徵集檔案;(六)國家檔案與機關檔案應釐清其定位;(七)重要科技檔案應納入國家檔案徵集策略或計畫,以滿足社會大眾對於科技研究的期望;(八)配合國家檔案之移轉策略,排定國家檔案鑑選之優先順序;(九)設置國家檔案館並儘速辦理國家檔案移轉;(十)加強培養檔案專業管理人員,以因應國家檔案徵集典藏之需求。 / This research is mainly discusses our country to face in the state-operated enterprise privatization process to create the industrial culture property outflow possibly, as well as will organize Fathom in accordance to the future Executive Yuan consolidation of the unit, the archives preservation to face the latent risk and the crisis possibly from now on, will need a set of complete national archives acquisition policy to follow as a means, besides will provide basis of the acquisition work, and may define clearly the file collection subject the order of priority, as well as will control into nature and the quantity of the national archives. In addition, the acquisition work along a prescribed path, systematization's way will carry on for establishment the best directive of our country national archives core collection.

This research utilizes “the documentary analysis” and “in-depth interview” to study conducts the research, besides discusses our country national archives appraisal to elect with the shifting strategy, as well as draws up the national archives acquisition policy to take an examination ponders the factor and so on, and to the U.S, British, Australia and Canada four countries to the national archives acquisition work impetus present situation, synthesizes induces and compares.

This research take the archives controlling organization (National Archives Administration), the central level institution (Ministry of National Defense, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Interior), the historical archives repositories(Taiwan Historical, National Palace Museum, Institute Modern History research archives Academia Sinica and Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica) and the local authority records management units (Taipei City government, Kaohsiung City government, Chiayi County government records center and Institute of Yilan County Historical) and so on four levels, 13 units as the main interview objects of study. The inquire deeply above unit records management situation, the archive reservation characteristic, preserved present situation and the unit has the permanent preserved value, conforms to the shifting National Archives Administration to become statistics of quantity the national archives, and to national archives viewpoints and the suggestions the acquisition policy formulation, and on our country national archives collection content with the order of priority. In addition, the related national archives regarding the social value, the function view, and aimed at the object of study sampling interview 26 archives users, in order to understood that its archives use experience and to the national archives use demand, the national archives collection content suggestion and the view, did take the time as our country drafts reference of the national archives acquisition policy.

According to the findings, this research proposed that six conclusions are: 1. the quality and quantity of national archives are urgently awaits to strengthen; 2. a risk the permanent preserved value archives urgently awaits to transfer; 3. the definition of the national archives has to clarified; 4. our country not yet constructs the national archives at present, is unable to collect the national archives massively; 5. shortage of national archives acquisition policy and affects the national archives quality; 6. the choose of national archives is time-consuming, cuts the archives transfer efficiency.

According to the findings, this research proposed that ten suggestions are: 1. schedules the national archives acquisition policy; 2. establishes mechanism of the national archives request substitute management; 3. establishes the standard of national archives examination, substantial national archives collection; 4. accelerates the national archives the collection, meets the populace need; 5. acquisition the national archives to consider linking up of the archives content with the integrity, avoids by the specific subjects; 6. both the national archives and the institution records should define clearly; 7.the important science and technology archives should be included into the national archives acquisition strategy or the plan, satisfies the social populace regarding the technical research expectation; 8. coordinates transfer strategy of the national archives, sets up the national archives appraisal to choose the order of priority; 9. establishes the national archives and as fast as possible handles national archives transferring; 10. strengthens the raise archives professional, by demand in accordance to the national archives acquisition.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0094155003
Creators凌寶華, Ling, Pao Hua
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds