Return to search

A educa??o profissional em debate: uma avalia??o pol?tica da forma??o para o trabalho ofertada pelo SENAC/RN atrav?s do Programa Nacional de Acesso ao Ensino T?cnico e Emprego

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-07-25T20:09:50Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
EmanuellyMedeirosBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1290355 bytes, checksum: f2dbd9f2f216f580028f49b160a6dacf (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-08-01T21:02:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
EmanuellyMedeirosBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1290355 bytes, checksum: f2dbd9f2f216f580028f49b160a6dacf (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-01T21:02:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
EmanuellyMedeirosBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1290355 bytes, checksum: f2dbd9f2f216f580028f49b160a6dacf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-09-11 / Esta pesquisa trata-se de uma avalia??o pol?tica da interpreta??o que o SENAC/RN faz do PRONATEC explicitando os princ?pios ideol?gicos, objetivos e teorias que s?o reproduzidas e refor?adas por essa institui??o atrav?s da forma??o profissional oferecida pelo programa. Buscamos desvelar os aspectos ideol?gicos que fundamentam a interpreta??o que o SENAC faz do PRONATEC e apontar a quais interesses concretos esses aspectos correspondem. Partimos da hip?tese provis?ria de que a transfer?ncia da responsabilidade do p?blico para o privado na execu??o do PROANTEC precariza a forma??o, fortalece a dualidade estrutural e subordina o programa aos interesses ideol?gicos, pol?ticos e econ?micos da institui??o privada. O caminho metodol?gico escolhido para nosso estudo avaliativo foi o estudo de caso ?nico. Como fonte de dados utilizamos levantamentos bibliogr?ficos, documentos oficiais do PRONATEC e do SENAC, discursos e dados sobre o programa e entrevistas. Ao final da pesquisa apresentam-se elementos que demonstram certa ?flexibiliza??o? do Pronatec aos interesses do SENAC, oferecendo uma forma??o profissional aligeirada para o trabalho, via de regra, sem rela??o com a educa??o proped?utica, focando na necessidade de adapta??o e consenso dos trabalhadores em torno de um projeto de sociedade. Neste sentido, o Pronatec, financiado com verba p?blica, ? usado pelo SENAC para se fortalecer no mercado da educa??o profissional e para constru??o hegem?nica neoliberal legitimando e criando consenso em torno desse modelo de sociedade. / In this study, we present a political evaluation of how SENAC/RN perceives PRONATEC, emphasizing all ideological principles, aims and theories that this institution reproduces and reinforces while playing this professional qualification program. We intended to reveal ideological aspects that inspire SENAC?s perception of PRONATEC, pointing the actual interests hidden by those aspects. Our starting question is: What ideologies, objectives and theories that are explicitly or implicitly reinforced by Senac in implementing PRONATEC? In the research, we consider the hypothesis that transferring the responsibility about PRONATEC from public to private institutions is something that impoverishes the professional formation process, once the program ends up subordinated to private institution?s ideological, political and economic interests. The methodological approach chosen was the single case study. As data source, we used broad literature survey, official files of PRONATEC and SENAC, official information about the program and personal interviews. At the end of the research, we present elements that show some ?flexibility? on PRONATEC due to SENAC?s interests, offering a superficial professional formation, commonly dissociated from a propaedeutic education, focusing on the need of adaptation e consensus of works around a society project. In this regard, despite PRONATEC is payed by public resources, it?s been used by SENAC as a fortifier of this institution on professional education market, in an hegemonic and neoliberal construction of a model of society.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21067
Date11 September 2015
CreatorsBezerra, Emanuelly Medeiros
Contributors05944538368, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5842101500628299, Moura, Dante Henrique, 24324841420, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1720357515433453, Vitullo, Gabriel Eduardo, 00102114463, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0274943582470997, Souza, Lincoln Moraes de
PublisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM CI?NCIAS SOCIAIS, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0036 seconds