Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-04-16T14:48:09Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Danusia Braeske Pulla.pdf: 872344 bytes, checksum: 7daac2d1f93ad97e7f533cdd98dd6b6b (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-03T18:24:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Danusia Braeske Pulla.pdf: 872344 bytes, checksum: 7daac2d1f93ad97e7f533cdd98dd6b6b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-03T18:31:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Danusia Braeske Pulla.pdf: 872344 bytes, checksum: 7daac2d1f93ad97e7f533cdd98dd6b6b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-01-31 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This dissertation aims to study the problem of free will in the compatibilism x incompatibilism debate from the perspective of Robert Kane. We first seek to characterize these two philosophical views and present their main arguments. In a second moment, we examine two conditions Kane?s takes as necessary for free will, namely alternative possibilities and ultimate responsibility. In the third chapter we explore specifically the theory of Robert Kane, mainly through the analysis of his work The Significance of Free Will. In the last chapter we discuss and comment on some of the main criticisms of the philosopher's theory. Throughout this work we analyze indeterminism from different perspectives in order to better understand the problems that constitute the greatest challenge to the intelligibility of incompatibilist free will. In the end, we conclude that there is still a way to go in order to respond satisfactorily to some criticisms but it seems too early or too strong to claim that Kane's freedom is not coherent or intelligible. / Esta disserta??o visa estudar o problema da liberdade no debate compatibilismo x incompatibilismo a partir da ?tica de Robert Kane. Buscamos primeiramente caracterizar essas duas vertentes filos?ficas e apresentar seus principais argumentos. Em um segundo momento, examinamos duas condi??es necess?rias para que haja liberdade para Kane, a saber, possibilidades alternativas e responsabilidade ?ltima. No terceiro cap?tulo exploramos especificamente a teoria de Robert Kane, principalmente por meio da an?lise da sua obra The Significance of Free Will. No ?ltimo cap?tulo expomos e comentamos algumas das principais cr?ticas feitas ? teoria do fil?sofo. Ao longo de todo o trabalho analisamos o indeterminismo sob diferentes perspectivas a fim de compreender melhor os problemas que constituem o maior desafio ? inteligibilidade da liberdade incompatibilista. Ao final, concluimos que ainda h? um caminho a se percorrer para responder satisfatoriamente a algumas cr?ticas por?m parece precoce ou forte demais se afirmar que a liberdade de Kane n?o ? coerente ou intelig?vel.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7975 |
| Date | 31 January 2018 |
| Creators | Pulla, Danusia Braeske |
| Contributors | Pich, Roberto Hofmeister |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 500, 500, 500, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds