Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-07-26T18:05:15Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - Albiane Carvalho Dias.pdf: 1710937 bytes, checksum: 54d2634d67d97d4c119e2aa8507ca99b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-26T18:05:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2017 - Albiane Carvalho Dias.pdf: 1710937 bytes, checksum: 54d2634d67d97d4c119e2aa8507ca99b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-02-23 / CAPES / The inappropriate management of leachate can cause negative environmental impacts, in order to compromise the availability and quality of natural resources, reason of to their complex composition and high polluter potential. One of the alternatives for the treatment of landfill leachate is its combined treatment with domestic sewage in sewage treatment plants, although higher proportions of the leachate in the sewage could compromise the efficiency of the process. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the combined treatment of landfill leachate and domestic sewage in biomass and activated carbon systems. For this, were used sequential batch reactors in lab-scale and two types of activated carbon - granular (GAC) and pulverized (PAC). The work consisted of two stages, among them they are: the tests where the reactors were fed with different mixtures of leachate/synthetic sewage (0, 2, 5 e 10%) and concentrations of GAC (0, 2, 4 e 6 g/L) operating with residence times 23h and sludge ages 28 days; and tests where the reactors were fed with a mixture of 5% leachate/sewage; fixed a PAC concentration of 6 g/L and were operated on with differents HRT of 23, 16 and 8 hours and sludge ages of 28, 28, and 17 days, respectively. It has been evaluated, the difference between the two types of carbon regarding COD removal efficiency, in the following configurations: fixing the concentration of carbono (6 g/L) and the percentage of leachate in the feed (5% v/v), for the batch time of 23 h and sludge age of 28 d. For the first step, it was possible to verify that the COD removal efficiency was higher in the reactors containing GAC and biomass when comparedes to the reactor containing only biomass. And along this stage of the experiment it was possible to observe that after the increase of leachate concentration in the feed there was a significant drop in COD removal efficiency. In the evaluation of the PACT? process, it was verified that the reactor with HRT of 23 h was the one that presented the best COD and color removal efficiencies the process, 79 and 44%, respectively. In the comparative tests between the two types of carbon, the PAC system proved to be much more efficient in the removal of COD, presenting an average efficiency of 79% when compared to the GAC system (63%). / O gerenciamento inadequado do lixiviado pode causar impactos ambientais negativos, de forma a comprometer a disponibilidade e qualidade dos recursos naturais, devido sua composi??o complexa e seu elevado potencial poluidor. Uma das alternativas para o tratamento de lixiviado de aterros sanit?rios ? o seu tratamento combinado com esgoto dom?stico em esta??es de tratamento de esgoto, embora propor??es mais elevadas do lixiviado no esgoto possam comprometer a efici?ncia do processo. Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a efici?ncia do tratamento combinado de lixiviado de aterro sanit?rio e esgoto dom?stico em sistemas com biomassa e carv?o ativado. Para isto, foram utilizados reatores em batelada sequencial em escala de laborat?rio e dois tipos de carv?o ativado- granular (CAG) e pulverizado (CAP). O trabalho foi constitu?do de duas etapas, dentre elas est?o: os ensaios onde os reatores foram alimentados com diferentes misturas de lixiviado/esgoto sint?tico (0, 2, 5 e 10%) e concentra??es de CAG (0, 2, 4 e 6 g/L) operando com tempos de resid?ncia de 23 h e idades do lodo de 28 dias; e ensaios onde os reatores foram alimentados com uma mistura de 5% de lixiviado/esgoto, fixado uma concentra??o de CAP de 6 g/L e foram operados com diferentes tempos de resid?ncia de 23, 16 e 8 horas e idades de lodo de 28, 28, e 17 dias, respectivamente. Avaliou-se, ainda, a diferen?a entre os dois tipos de carv?o quanto ? efici?ncia de remo??o de DQO, nas seguintes configura??es: fixando a concentra??o de carv?o (6 g/L) e o percentual de lixiviado na alimenta??o (5% v/v), para o tempo de batelada de 23 h e idade do lodo de 28 d. Para a primeira etapa, foi poss?vel verificar que a efici?ncia de remo??o de DQO foi superior nos reatores contendo CAG e biomassa quando comparados ao reator contendo apenas biomassa. E ao longo desta etapa do experimento foi poss?vel observar que ap?s o aumento da concentra??o de lixiviado na alimenta??o houve queda significativa na efici?ncia de remo??o de DQO. Na avalia??o do processo PACT?, verificou-se que o reator com tempo de resid?ncia de 23 h foi o que apresentou as melhores efici?ncias de remo??o de DQO e cor do processo, 79 e 44%, respectivamente. Nos testes comparativos entre os dois tipos de carv?o, o sistema com CAP mostrou-se muito mais eficiente na remo??o de DQO, apresentando efici?ncia m?dia de 79%, quando comparado ao sistema com CAG (63%).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/1919 |
| Date | 23 February 2017 |
| Creators | DIAS, Albiane Carvalho |
| Contributors | Nascentes, Alexandre Lioi, Campos, Juacyara Carbonelli, Nascentes, Alexandre Lioi, Campos, Juacyara Carbonelli, Casqueira, Rui de Goes, Oliveira, Jaime Lopes da Mota |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Tecnologia |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds