yes / In the UK at present Taser electrical stun weapons can only be used by trained firearms
officers in situations where the use of firearms is also authorised. But the Association of
Chief Police Officers (ACPO) is asking for these `non-lethal¿ weapons to be made more
widely available to other police officers. If this is agreed there will be significant implications
for the use of force by police in the UK. In July 2005 the Home Office Minister, Hazel
Blears, had stated that the Taser was a dangerous weapon and not appropriate for wider use.
The rationale behind the deployment of `non-lethal¿ or `less-lethal¿ weapons, such as the
Taser, is to provide police officers with an alternative to lethal force for dangerous and lifethreatening
situations they face. Wider availability of such weapons should, it is argued,
further limit the need to resort to lethal firearms and thereby reduce incidence of serious
injury and death. Over the past few months senior police officers have issued public
statements that the Taser weapon should be made available to all officers on the beat. They
argue that because police are facing dangerous individuals on an everyday basis, the Taser is
required to protect their officers and deal with violent offenders without having to call in a
firearms unit in certain situations. A crucial point about this proposal is that it would
represent a scaling up in the `visible¿ arming of police officers in the UK. It is claimed by
opponents that such an extended use of Taser would actually result in an increase in the level
of force used by police in the UK, a concern also echoed by the Independent Police
Complaints Committee (IPCC) in the minute of their 27 April 2005 `Casework and
Investigations Committee¿ meeting.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/4000 |
Date | January 2006 |
Creators | Davison, N., Lewer, N. |
Publisher | University of Bradford |
Source Sets | Bradford Scholars |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Report, published version paper |
Rights | © 2006 University of Bradford. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Relation | http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/research_reports/ |
Page generated in 0.0053 seconds