Submitted by PPG Letras (letraspg@pucrs.br) on 2018-02-21T20:19:38Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE_Vanessa.pdf: 1555897 bytes, checksum: fc90d369bd5074faaf2a7af3b1b453e8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-02-26T18:28:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE_Vanessa.pdf: 1555897 bytes, checksum: fc90d369bd5074faaf2a7af3b1b453e8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-02-26T18:38:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE_Vanessa.pdf: 1555897 bytes, checksum: fc90d369bd5074faaf2a7af3b1b453e8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-12-20 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Beginning with the ordinary silencing and the constant invisibility concerning the professional activity of the proofreader of academic texts, this research has the working activity of proofreader of texts in doctoral dissertations as an object of analysis. Our research employs Bakhtinian assumptions and establishes an interface with ergological studies to analyze the text revision activity in order to problematize proofreader?s work and, mainly, to observe the dialogical relations involved in this task. The specific goals of this research intend to: a) investigate the existence of the proofreader?s voice in the final version of doctoral dissertations and its discursive relevance for the text revision; b) analyze how the overlapping of proofreader?s own word and someone else?s word occur in the dialogical relationship between the reviewer and the author of text; c) observe aspects arising from the interrelation between norms and renormalizations of the activity of revision of doctoral dissertations; and d) verify axiological positions of both proofreader and author through the actions developed by proofreader and author during the review as well as observe the nature of the relation between those subjects and the text. Thus, the material of this research is: i) e-mails exchanged between the authors of dissertations and the proofreaders; and (ii) revision processes in the versions of texts from students of different areas of knowledge, which are, excerpts extracted during language exchanges - sections with their respective comments inserted through available editing tools such as Word. This way, the excerpts from the analyzed texts and the comments in the versions that constitute the text final version allow us to contemplate different stages of development of the written production as well as to observe the existence of the proofreader?s voice as well as the discursive relevance in the last version of the texts. Moreover, these stages of elaboration of the revised text also allow us to analyze how the overlapping of the proofreader and author's words occurs in the final version of texts, in other words, in what ways the words of these interlocutors interrelate in the final texture of the text reviewed. The e-mails exchanged between the subjects of the review activity, in turn, allow us to observe aspects arising from the interrelation between norms and renormalizations of the activity in the work developed in the academic dissertations, since it is by e-mail that subjects debate both the definition of revision contracted and how it is developed. Finally, the selected material allow us to verify the axiological positions of both (proofreaders and authors) through the actions developed by them during the review and also to observe the nature of the relation between the subjects and the text. Thus, in the analyzes developed, we observe statements exchanged between proofreaders and authors of revised theses that reflect a working idea together, considering that the revision of texts is being built in the interaction with the author, instead of being an individual work, centered on the proofreader. When considering the reviewing as the focus, from ideological signs emerge dialogic relationships that reveal different discursive voices and value accents for the proofreader?s job, which qualify this activity and give clues of a cooperative work. These considerations help us to build the thesis of this research that is to show the activity of reviewing academic texts as an essentially collaborative doing between author and proofreader. It demonstrates therefore, that the academic text that goes through the revision process is, in a way, (co) produced jointly by the dissertation author and the proofreader from the overlapping of their voices in the final texture of the written production. The proofreader, in this web of meanings, occupies a place marked by approximations and distances both from the author of the text and from the textual production itself. This professional seeks a balance between placing himself in the locus of the other - empathic movement - to understand the general creation of the writing, and moving away - exotopic movement - to act as a critical reader, able to observe the whole project to say, foreseeing possibilities for a better completion of the text. / Partant du silenciement et de l'invisibilit? constante communs en ce qui concerne l'activit? professionnelle du r?viseur de textes acad?miques, cette recherche a pour objet d'?tudier l'activit? du r?viseur de textes dans les th?ses acad?miques. Notre recherche est fond?e sur les postulats bakhtiniens et ?tablit une interface avec les ?tudes ergologiques pour analyser l'activit? de r?vision textuelle, afin de discuter du travail du r?viseur de textes et, surtout, pour observer les relations dialogiques constitutives de son activit?. En ce qui concerne ses objectifs sp?cifiques, la recherche vise ?: a) ?tudier la pr?sence et la pertinence discursive de la voix du professionnel responsable de la r?vision des textes pour la version finale des th?ses r?vis?es; b) analyser comment se produit l'imbrication du mot propre et de l'autre mot dans la relation dialogique entre le r?viseur et l'auteur du texte r?vis?; c) observer les aspects d?coulant de l'interrelation entre les normes et les renormalisations de l'activit? du travail d?velopp? dans les th?ses acad?miques; et d) v?rifier les positions axiologiques des deux sujets impliqu?s dans l'activit? de r?vision (auteur et r?viseur) ? propos des actions d?velopp?es et de la nature de leur relation. Ainsi, le mat?riel de recherche utilis? pour cette th?se est constitu?e par: i) les e-mails ?chang?s entre les auteurs des th?ses et leurs respectifs r?viseur; et (ii) les processus de r?vision pr?sents dans les versions de th?ses des doctorantes issues de diff?rents domaines de connaissance, c'est-?-dire des extraits des textes lors des ?changes linguistiques ?tablis entre les auteurs et les r?viseurs, ces extraits accompagn?s de leurs commentaires respectifs ins?r?s ? travers les outils d'?dition disponibilis?s par un logiciel tel que Word. De cette fa?on, les extraits des textes analys?s et les commentaires dans les versions qui composent l??laboration du texte jusqu?? la version finale nous permettent de contempler les diff?rentes ?tapes de d?veloppement de la production ?crite et d?observer la pr?sence et l'importance discursive de la voix du professionnel de r?vision de textes dans la version finale des th?ses r?vis?es. De plus, ces ?tapes de la r?daction du texte r?vis? nous permettent d'analyser aussi comment arrive le chevauchement de la parole du r?viseur et de l'auteur dans la version finale du texte r?vis?, autrement dit, de quelle mani?re les paroles de ces interlocuteurs s'inter-relationnent dans la tessiture de texte final r?vis?. La correspondance ?lectronique ?chang?e entre les sujets de l'activit? mise en ?vidence, ? son tour, permet de remarquer les aspects d?coulant de l'interrelation entre les normes et la renormalisation de l'activit? du travail d?velopp? dans les th?ses universitaires, car il est par e-mail que les sujets discutent ? la fois la d?finition de la r?vision qui sera engag?e quant la fa?on dont elle sera d?velopp?e. Enfin, le mat?riel s?lectionn? nous permet de v?rifier les positions axiologiques des r?viseurs et des auteurs avec l'activit? ? propos des t?ches d?velopp?es et de la nature des relations ?tablies entre eux. Ainsi, dans les analyses d?velopp?es, nous observons les ?nonc?s ?chang?s entre les r?viseurs et les auteurs de th?ses r?vis?es qui refl?tent une id?e de travail en commun, en consid?rant que la r?vision de textes se construit dans l'interaction avec l'auteur, au lieu d'?tre un travail individuel, centr? sur le r?viseur. En mettant l'action de faire en ?vidence, les signes id?ologiques font ?merger les relations dialogiques qui r?v?lent de diff?rentes voix discursives et des accents de valeur pour l'activit? du r?viseur et en plus, qui qualifient l'activit? en question et donnent des indices d'un travail coop?ratif. Ces consid?rations nous permettent d'arriver ? la th?se de ce travail qu'il s'agit de montrer que l'activit? de r?vision des textes acad?miques est un travail essentiellement collaboratif entre l'auteur et le r?viseur, ce qui montre donc, que le texte acad?mique qui passe par le processus de r?vision est, en quelque sorte, (co) produit conjointement par l'auteur de la th?se et le r?viseur du texte ? partir de l'imbrication de leurs voix dans la tessiture finale de la production ?crite. Le r?viseur, dans ce r?seau de sens, occupe un espace marqu? par les rapprochements et les diff?rences de l'auteur du texte et de la production textuelle elle-m?me. De plus, il cherche un ?quilibre entre se mettre ? la place de l'autre - mouvement empathique - pour comprendre la tessiture g?n?rale de l'?criture et de s'?loigner - mouvement exotopique ? pour agir comme un lecteur critique, capable d'observer l'ensemble du projet de dire, en entrevoyant les possibilit?s pour un meilleur ach?vement du texte. / Partindo do silenciamento e da constante invisibilidade comuns quando se trata da atividade profissional do revisor de textos acad?micos, esta pesquisa tem como objeto de estudo a atividade de trabalho do revisor de textos em teses acad?micas. Nossa pesquisa ancora-se nos pressupostos bakhtinianos e estabelece interface com os estudos ergol?gicos para analisar a atividade de revis?o textual, com vistas a problematizar o trabalho do revisor de textos e, principalmente, a observar rela??es dial?gicas constitutivas desse fazer. Quanto aos objetivos espec?ficos, a pesquisa visa: a) investigar a presen?a e a relev?ncia discursiva da voz do profissional respons?vel pela revis?o de textos na vers?o final de teses revisadas; b) analisar como ocorre o imbricamento de palavra pr?pria e palavra alheia na rela??o dial?gica entre revisor e autor do texto revisado; c) observar aspectos advindos da inter-rela??o entre normas e renormaliza??es da atividade no trabalho desenvolvido nas teses acad?micas; e d) verificar posi??es axiol?gicas dos sujeitos envolvidos com a atividade de revis?o (autor e revisor) acerca dos fazeres desenvolvidos e da natureza da rela??o entre eles. Desse modo, constituem o material de pesquisa desta tese: i) e-mails trocados entre os autores das teses e os seus respectivos revisores; e ii) processos de revis?o presentes nas vers?es de teses de doutorandas advindas de diferentes ?reas do conhecimento, ou seja, excertos dos textos durante as trocas linguageiras estabelecidas entre autores e revisores, trechos esses com os seus respectivos coment?rios inseridos por meio das ferramentas de edi??o de texto dispon?veis em softwares como o Microsoft Word. Tais trechos dos textos analisados e os coment?rios nas vers?es que constituem a elabora??o do texto na vers?o final permitem contemplar diferentes est?gios de desenvolvimento da produ??o escrita bem como observar a presen?a e a relev?ncia discursiva da voz do profissional da revis?o de textos na vers?o final das teses revisadas. Ademais, essas etapas de elabora??o do texto revisado possibilitam, tamb?m, analisar como ocorre o imbricamento da palavra do revisor e do autor na vers?o final do texto revisado, ou seja, de que maneiras as palavras desses interlocutores se inter-relacionam na tessitura final do texto revisado. As correspond?ncias eletr?nicas trocadas entre os sujeitos da atividade em foco, por sua vez, oportunizam a observa??o de aspectos advindos da inter-rela??o entre normas e renormaliza??es da atividade no trabalho desenvolvido nas teses acad?micas, posto que ? por e-mail que os sujeitos debatem tanto a defini??o de revis?o a ser contratada quanto o modo como ela ser? desenvolvida. Por fim, o material selecionado propicia verificar as posi??es axiol?gicas de revisores e autores com a atividade sobre os fazeres desenvolvidos e a natureza das rela??es estabelecidas entre eles. Assim, nas an?lises desenvolvidas, observamos enunciados trocados entre revisores e autores de teses revisadas que refletem uma ideia de trabalho em conjunto, tendo em vista que a revis?o de textos vai se construindo na intera??o com o autor, em vez de se tratar de um trabalho individual, centrado no revisor. No fazer em foco, os signos ideol?gicos fazem emergir as rela??es dial?gicas que revelam diferentes vozes discursivas e acentos de valor para o fazer do revisor e que qualificam a atividade em quest?o e d?o pistas de um trabalho cooperativo. Essas considera??es asseguram a tese deste trabalho, a saber: a atividade de revis?o de textos acad?micos ? um fazer essencialmente colaborativo entre autor e revisor. Tal ponto de vista mostra que o texto acad?mico que passa pelo processo de revis?o ?, de certo modo, (co)produzido conjuntamente pelo autor da tese e pelo revisor de texto com base no imbricamento de suas vozes na tessitura final da produ??o escrita. O revisor, nessa teia de sentidos, ocupa um lugar marcado por aproxima??es e distanciamentos tanto do autor do texto quanto da produ??o textual em si e busca um equil?brio entre o colocar-se no lugar do outro ? movimento emp?tico ?, para compreender a tessitura geral da escrita, e o afastar-se ? movimento exot?pico ?, para atuar como um leitor cr?tico, capaz de observar o todo do projeto de dizer, vislumbrando possibilidades de melhor acabamento do texto.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7865 |
| Date | 20 December 2017 |
| Creators | Barbosa, Vanessa Fonseca |
| Contributors | Di Fanti, Maria da Gl?ria Corr?a |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Letras, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | French |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 8447345070736321569, 500, 500, 500, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, -5409419262886498088, -2555911436985713659, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.011 seconds