Submitted by Ana Pliopas (analuisavieira@uol.com.br) on 2018-07-13T17:36:57Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese Ana Pliopas Final.pdf: 5918850 bytes, checksum: 095b485a22d53c9258dab0acec76ca83 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Debora Nunes Ferreira (debora.nunes@fgv.br) on 2018-07-16T15:20:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese Ana Pliopas Final.pdf: 5918850 bytes, checksum: 095b485a22d53c9258dab0acec76ca83 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzane Guimarães (suzane.guimaraes@fgv.br) on 2018-07-16T16:47:42Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese Ana Pliopas Final.pdf: 5918850 bytes, checksum: 095b485a22d53c9258dab0acec76ca83 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-16T16:47:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese Ana Pliopas Final.pdf: 5918850 bytes, checksum: 095b485a22d53c9258dab0acec76ca83 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-06-11 / Coaching é empregado por organizações para propiciar desenvolvimento a executivos, desde a década de oitenta, e seu uso aumenta desde então. A despeito da vasta utilização em organizações, os poucos estudos sobre as relações que se estabelecem entre o coachee, o coach e a organização evidenciam a complexidade dessas relações, em que há agendas múltiplas de jogos de poder. Há portanto oportunidade para o aprofundamento do entendimento de relações triangulares e diádicas em coaching executivo. Este estudo é relevante à medida que aprofunda o entendimento de uma prática organizacional frequentemente empregada, porém com poucos estudos sobre as relações entre coachees, coaches e organização. O estudo está fundamentado na perspectiva teórica do construcionismo social, que visa a entender como as pessoas dão sentidos ao mundo onde vivem e ao que fazem, ampliando assim as opções de entendimento de um fenômeno. A abordagem metodológica adotada foi a grounded theory, conduzida de maneira coerente com o construcionismo social. Os dados foram obtidos com entrevistas de 45 pessoas, sendo 16 coachees, 15 coaches e 14 profissionais de Administração de Recursos Humanos. Como resultado do estudo, três sentidos principais sobre as dinâmicas das relações entre o coachee, o coach e a organização foram elaborados. Primeiramente as relações triangulares e diádicas presentes em coaching executivo foram ressignificadas, com a sugestão de que as relações entre os diferentes atores em coaching executivo têm relevância e dinâmicas distintas. A relação entre o coach e o coachee é fundamental e a manutenção do sigilo do conteúdo das sessões de coaching primordial para a preservação de tal relação. Independentemente disso, a organização permeia a relação entre o coachee e e o coach, à medida que há expectativas de que contas sejam prestadas à organização. Também foi elaborado um contínuo no qual diferentes discursos de coaching foram posicionados. Esse contínuo chama atenção para um paradoxo de coaching executivo: quanto mais o processo de coaching se aproxima do discurso gerencial de coaching, dando mais atenção ao desenvolvimento de competências do executivo para atingir metas organizacionais, mais coaching assume um caráter instrumental, o que subtrai do coachee sua relevância no processo, com a potencialidade de tornar o processo de coaching inócuo. Finalmente há a proposição de uma dimensão vertical de coaching executivo acerca de temas que coaches e coachees percorrem em sessões de coaching. Esse sentido traz uma perspectiva integradora de coaching, no qual diferentes olhares permitem ao coachee elaborar sentidos sobre os temas de seu desenvolvimento. / Organizations have employed coaching to develop executives since the 1980s, and such practice has increased since then. Despite its wide use in organizations, there are few studies about the relationships established between the coachee, the coach and the organization, and such studies focus on the complexity of such relationships, in which there are multiple agendas of power games. Therefore, there is opportunity to deepen the understanding of triangular and dyadic relationships in executive coaching. This study is relevant as it deepens the understanding of a frequently employed organizational practice, but with few studies on the relationships between coachees, coaches and organization. The work is based on the social constructivist theoretical perspective, which aims to understand how people make sense of the world they live in and what they do, broadening, this way, the options for understanding a phenomenon. The methodological approach adopted was grounded theory, conducted in a manner consistent with social constructionism. Data were obtained with interviews of 45 people, being 16 coachees, 15 coaches and 14 professionals of Human Resources Administration. As result of the study, three main meanings on the dynamics of the relationships between the coachee, the coach and the organization were elaborated. Firstly, the triangular and dyadic relationships present in executive coaching were re-signified, suggesting that the relationships between the different actors in executive coaching have different dynamics and relevance. The relationship between the coach and the coachee is fundamental, and the maintenance of the confidentiality of the coaching sessions content, essential for preserving such relationship. Despite the importance of such relationship, the organization permeates the relationship between the coachee and the coach, since it is expected that coach and coachee will also comply with the interest of the organization. Another result elaborated from the study was a continuum, in which different coaching discourses were positioned. This continuum highlights a paradox present in executive coaching: the closer the coaching process is to the managerial discourse of coaching, prioritizing skills development to achieve organizational goals, the more coaching may assume an instrumental quality, subtracting the coachee’s relevance from the process. This has the potential to make the coaching process innocuous. Finally, a vertical dimension of executive coaching is proposed, which address topics that coaches and coachees go through during coaching sessions. This meaning offers an integrative perspective of coaching, in which different perspectives allow coachees to make meaning about their development.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:10438/24298 |
| Date | 11 June 2018 |
| Creators | Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira |
| Contributors | Silveira, Rafael Alcadipani da, Casado, Tania, Krausz, Rosa Rosemberg, Escolas::EAESP, Tonelli, Maria José |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas, instacron:FGV |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds