Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-04-24T14:55:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_ANDRE_ROCHA_SAMPAIO_PARCIAL.pdf: 1075561 bytes, checksum: af1c18eaf6b0996a5bb67b3510f7f4fe (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-24T14:55:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_ANDRE_ROCHA_SAMPAIO_PARCIAL.pdf: 1075561 bytes, checksum: af1c18eaf6b0996a5bb67b3510f7f4fe (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-17 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Around 2008 there was a series of reforms in the brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure, including the one that changed the text of Article 155. The original text of the Bill provided for the use only of the acts produced in contradictory court for building the judicial conviction. However, based on arguments of authoritarian nature, the text approved enables the juditial conviction also in acts of investigation, as long as not exclusively. Despite the text continues assigning greater value to acts of proof compared to research acts - as it is possible sentencing only based on those and not on these ? it has been commonplace in forensic practice the widespread use of research actions, subtly standing to not grossly defying the norm in question. Factors that support this systemic re-accommodation, this slide between the designed, approved and implemented has ramifications far beyond the legal boundaries. The political, the social, the anthropological and the historical are just some of the fields in which it is possible to see, each in its own way, authoritarianism spread founding what is meant today by a "biopolitics of bodies". In this path, the criminal case is handled by its obverse: from a reducer instrument of political power it metamorfoses itself into certain criminal policy enforcement tool, backed only in fear of unreasonable / irrational nature. An analysis of the main institutions involved in this process, namely the judicial police and the judge, only corroborate to unveil the ingenuity or trick in keeping the current configuration of the relationship of the court judgment to the preliminary acts of investigation. Therefore, it became imperative to find ways to dam the authoritarian impulses that blend together the systemic gaps, going beyond the physical exclusion of acts of investigation in the judicial phase - taking into account the previous separation between judge of guarantees and judge of the process and the distinction between repeatable and unrepeatable acts of research - but going beyond, targeting the possibility of maximum compression of the preliminary phase, which is feasible before the provisional arrest request situation during the investigative phase. By the presented model, the statement would have at least their repeatable acts exclusively produced in contradictory court, reducing the possibilities of sentence contamination with the acts arising from the previous phase. / Em meados do ano de 2008 houve uma s?rie de reformas no C?digo de Processo Penal brasileiro, entre elas a que modificou a reda??o do seu artigo 155. A reda??o original do Projeto de Lei previa a utiliza??o apenas dos atos produzidos em contradit?rio judicial para a constru??o do convencimento judicial. No entanto, com base em argumentos de cariz autorit?rio, a reda??o aprovada permite a fundamenta??o tamb?m nos atos de investiga??o, contanto que n?o de forma exclusiva. Em que pese a reda??o continuar atribuindo maior valor aos atos de prova em compara??o aos atos de investiga??o ? visto ser poss?vel a condena??o apenas com base naqueles e n?o nestes ? tem sido corriqueiro na praxe forense a vasta utiliza??o de atos de investiga??o, sutilmente legitimados para n?o afrontarem crassamente a norma em quest?o. Os fatores que servem de suporte para essa reacomoda??o sist?mica, esse deslizar entre o projetado, o aprovado e o aplicado tem ramifica??es muito al?m das fronteiras jur?dicas. O pol?tico, o social, o antropol?gico e o hist?rico s?o apenas alguns dos campos nos quais podemos perceber, cada um a seu modo, o autoritarismo se espraiar fundando o que se entende hoje por uma ?biopol?tica dos corpos?. Nessa senda, o processo penal ? manejado pelo seu anverso: de instrumento redutor do excesso do emprego do poder pol?tico ele se metamorfoseia em verdadeiro instrumento de aplica??o de determinada pol?tica criminal, lastreada apenas no medo de cariz il?gico/irracional. Uma an?lise das principais institui??es envolvidas nesse processo, quais sejam a pol?cia judici?ria e o juiz, apenas corroboram para desvelar a ingenuidade ou o ardil em se manter a atual configura??o da rela??o da senten?a judicial com os atos preliminares de investiga??o. Assim sendo, tornou-se imprescind?vel encontrar meios de represar as puls?es autorit?rias que se imiscuem pelas brechas sist?micas, meios estes que envolvem a exclus?o f?sica dos atos de investiga??o na fase judicial ? levando em considera??o a separa??o pr?via entre juiz de garantias e juiz do processo e a distin??o entre atos de investiga??o repet?veis e irrepet?veis ? mas indo al?m, almejando a possibilidade de m?xima compress?o da fase preliminar, o que ? vi?vel diante da situa??o de requerimento de pris?o cautelar no decorrer da fase investigativa. Pelo modelo apresentado, a instru??o teria ao menos os seus atos repet?veis produzidos exclusivamente em contradit?rio judicial, reduzindo as possibilidades de contamina??o da senten?a com os atos oriundos da fase antecedente.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7240 |
| Date | 17 March 2016 |
| Creators | Sampaio, Andr? Rocha |
| Contributors | Giacomolli, Nereu Jos? |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 600, 600, 600, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0041 seconds