Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-05-06T17:11:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_TIAGO_ FENSTERSEIFER_PARCIAL.pdf: 646287 bytes, checksum: 3fe1773ca01087abda0c57debfd9eaae (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-05-06T17:11:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_TIAGO_ FENSTERSEIFER_PARCIAL.pdf: 646287 bytes, checksum: 3fe1773ca01087abda0c57debfd9eaae (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-29 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The aim of this thesis is to undertake study on the current constitutional and infra-constitutional legal regime of the Public Defender in Brazil, including through the prism of his new position in the Justice System. Under the new institutional legislative scenario opened by Constitutional Amendment 45/2004 (Reform of the Judiciary), and complemented, among other legal instruments, by the Federal Law 11.448/2007 (which established its legitimacy to the class action), by the reform of the National Law of Public Defense ? Federal Law 80/94 (held by the Federal Law 132/2009), by the Constitutional Amendment 74/2013 (Constitutional Autonomy of Federal Public Defense), by the Constitutional Amendment 80/2014, and by the New Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/2015), sets to the Public Defense a new paradigm of assignments and role to play in the Justice System, breaking with its classic liberal individualistic design - focused almost exclusively on individual judicial action in criminal law - for the sake of legitimacy to act, both at the individual and collective procedure, in the protection and promotion of fundamental rights of all generations or dimensions (liberal, social and ecological) of ownership of those in need (both economic and organizational perspective). In light of this new regulatory framework, the thesis develops the consecration of the fundamental social right to full and free legal assistance ownership of individuals and needy social groups (or vulnerable) in the Federal Constitution of 1988 (art. 5, LXXIV), including it as content of the fundamental right-guarantee the existential minimum (minimum core obligation). Based on the public model for providing legal assistance to those in need through the Public Defender enshrined in our Constitution (art. 134), the State (State-Legislator and State-Administrator), both at the federal and state levels, the progressivity duty to ensure proper structuring the institution, under penalty of judicial intervention in the case of omission or insufficient performance (under the principle of proportionality). / O objetivo da presente tese ? empreender estudo sobre o atual regime jur?dico constitucional e infraconstitucional da Defensoria P?blica no Brasil, inclusive pelo prisma da sua nova posi??o perante o Sistema de Justi?a. Frente ao novo cen?rio legislativo institucional inaugurado pela Emenda Constitucional 45/2004 (Reforma do Poder Judici?rio), passando, entre outros diplomas, pela Lei 11.448/2007 (que consagrou sua legitimidade para o ajuizamento de a??o civil p?blica), pela reforma da Lei Org?nica Nacional da Defensoria ? Lei 80/94 (realizada por meio da Lei Complementar Federal 132/2009), pela Emenda Constitucional 74/2013 (Autonomia da DPU e da DP/DF), pela Emenda Constitucional 80/2014 e pelo Novo C?digo de Processo Civil (Lei 13.105/2015), vislumbra-se para a Defensoria P?blica um novo paradigma de atribui??es e papel a exercer no ?mbito do Sistema de Justi?a, rompendo com sua concep??o cl?ssica de fei??o liberal individualista - centrada quase que exclusivamente na atua??o judicial individual na ?rea criminal ? em prol da sua legitimidade para atuar, tanto no ?mbito individual quanto coletivo, na tutela e promo??o dos direitos fundamentais de todas as dimens?es (liberais, sociais e ecol?gicos) de titularidade das pessoas necessitadas (tanto pelo prisma econ?mico quanto organizacional). ? luz desse novo marco normativo, desenvolve-se a consagra??o do direito fundamental social ? assist?ncia jur?dica integral e gratuita de titularidade dos indiv?duos e grupos sociais necessitados (ou vulner?veis) na Constitui??o Federal de 1988 (art. 5?, LXXIV), inclusive como conte?do do direito-garantia fundamental ao m?nimo existencial. Tomando por base o modelo p?blico de presta??o de assist?ncia jur?dica aos necessitados por meio da Defensoria P?blica consagrado pelo nosso texto constitucional (art. 134), cabe ao Estado (Estado-Legislador e Estado-Administrador), tanto no plano federal quanto estadual (e distrital), o dever de progressividade no sentido de assegurar adequada estrutura??o ? institui??o, sob pena de interven??o judicial na hip?tese de omiss?o ou atua??o insuficiente (? luz do princ?pio da proporcionalidade).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6646 |
| Date | 29 March 2016 |
| Creators | Fensterseifer, Tiago |
| Contributors | Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds