Despite a wealth of studies on differences regarding the biobehavioral and social–psychological bases of mental disorders in men and women and repeated calls for increased attention, women-specific issues have so far not been comprehensively addressed in past diagnostic classification systems of mental disorders. There is also increasing evidence that this situation will not change significantly in the upcoming revisions of ICD-11 and DSM-V. This paper explores reasons for this continued failure, highlighting three major barriers: the fragmentation of the field of women's mental health research, lack of emphasis on diagnostic classificatory issues beyond a few selected clinical conditions, and finally, the “current rules of game” used by the current DSM-V Task Forces in the revision process of DSM-V. The paper calls for concerted efforts of researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders within a more coherent and comprehensive framework aiming at broader coverage of women-specific diagnostic classificatory issues in future diagnostic systems.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:25035 |
| Date | January 2010 |
| Creators | Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich |
| Publisher | Technische Universität |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | doc-type:article, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, doc-type:Text |
| Source | Archives of Women's Mental Health, Bd. 13 (2010), Nr. 1, S. 51-55, ISSN: 1434-1816, EISSN: 1435-1102 |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 10.1007/s00737-009-0138-6 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds