Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-09T18:24:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_RODRIGO_HICKMANN_KLEIN_COMPLETO.pdf: 4010969 bytes, checksum: e6e40ec10532b87272f402f9ec89d96e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-09T18:24:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_RODRIGO_HICKMANN_KLEIN_COMPLETO.pdf: 4010969 bytes, checksum: e6e40ec10532b87272f402f9ec89d96e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-09T18:24:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_RODRIGO_HICKMANN_KLEIN_COMPLETO.pdf: 4010969 bytes, checksum: e6e40ec10532b87272f402f9ec89d96e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-10-19 / The Government Open Data (DAG) is the data made available free of charge by government
entities and can be freely used, reused and redistributed by any person. The Brazilian portals
that provide Open Government Data (PBDAG) need to meet a number of mechanisms so that
the discovery, extraction and use of data can be effectively carried out by society. However,
the lack of mechanisms that guarantee the reliability and data quality in PBDAGs makes
difficult to increase transparency for the purpose of accountability. The research focus is the
mechanisms identification that increases transparency in PBDAG with the purpose of
attending Accountability Theory (TA) accountability process. By systematic reviews of the
scientific literature on OGD and Accountability Theory, covering 124 and 594 articles
respectively, and the subsequent interview with national experts in OGD, 18 mechanisms and
their indicators were proposed, which aim to increase the degree of transparency in Portals
which provide Open Government Data. The proposed mechanisms were considered extremely
and very important in the perception of the majority of the 115 users of OGD, respondents of
the electronic instrument. The results showed that the evolution of the use and the research on
OGD made it possible to add authenticity, irrefutability, integrity, compliance, amplitude,
reliability and citizen participation to the original mechanisms. The classification of these
mechanisms and the formulation of a transparency index made it possible to evaluate and
classify the portals that make OGD available through a content analysis, which analyzed 833
data sets. The criteria and ease of future reapplication will allow comparison with other
national portals, serving as a benchmarking to public managers, stakeholders and area
researchers. In terms of theoretical contributions the two Systematic Reviews of Literature
(RSL) help to illustrate the status quo of scientific research on these two themes. In this sense,
the broad categorization of research on OGD, obtained through the RSL, produced a
classification in 7 dimensions, coming from the OGD concept and in 10 terms more
approached in articles about OGD. This categorization makes it possible to indicate which
directions can be adopted in future research on OGD and which topics have already been
extensively explored, as well as possible combinations among them. The results of the present
study extend the scope of Accountability Theory by focusing on the accountability of public
agents, through the OGDs, since the perception of the respondents demonstrates the aspects
that increase the transparency to serve this purpose. The present research also demonstrated
a new method for evaluation of items by interviewees, during semi-structured interviews. In
addition, it produced a new electronic data collection instrument to be used in future research
on increasing transparency for OGD portals, with a focus on accountability. Nevertheless,
the present research was able to gather and combine concepts from the area of Information
Security, with concepts from the Open Government area, along with concepts derived from
studies on Transparency and Accountability Theory concepts. / O Dado Aberto Governamental (DAG) ? o dado disponibilizado de forma gratuita por entes
governamentais e pode ser livremente utilizado, reutilizado e redistribu?do por qualquer
pessoa. Os portais brasileiros que disponibilizam Dados Abertos Governamentais (PBDAG)
precisam atender a uma s?rie de mecanismos para que a descoberta, a extra??o e o
aproveitamento dos dados possam ser realizados de forma efetiva pela sociedade. No entanto,
a falta de mecanismos que garantam a fidedignidade e a qualidade dos dados em PBDAGs
dificulta a amplia??o da transpar?ncia como o prop?sito de accountability. O foco desta
pesquisa abrange a identifica??o dos mecanismos que ampliam a transpar?ncia em PBDAG
com prop?sito de atender ao processo accountability da Accountability Theory (AT). Por
interm?dio de revis?es sistem?ticas da literatura cient?fica sobre DAG e sobre Accountability
Theory, abrangendo 124 e 594 artigos respectivamente, e da posterior entrevista com
especialistas nacionais em DAG, foram propostos 18 mecanismos, e respectivos indicadores,
que visam ampliar o grau de transpar?ncia em PBDAGs. Os mecanismos propostos foram
considerados extremamente e muito importantes na percep??o da maioria dos 115 usu?rios de
DAG, respondentes do instrumento eletr?nico. Os resultados demonstraram que a evolu??o
do uso e das pesquisas sobre DAG possibilitaram agregar os mecanismos autenticidade,
irrefutabilidade, integridade, conformidade, amplitude, confiabilidade e participa??o cidad?
aos mecanismos originais. A classifica??o desses mecanismos e a formula??o de um ?ndice de
transpar?ncia possibilitaram avaliar e classificar os portais que disponibilizam DAG, atrav?s
de uma an?lise de conte?do, que analisou 833 conjuntos de dados. Os crit?rios e a facilidade
de reaplica??o futura permitir?o a compara??o com demais portais nacionais, servindo como
um benchmarking aos gestores p?blicos, ?s partes interessadas e aos pesquisadores da ?rea.
Em termos de contribui??es te?ricas as duas Revis?es Sistem?ticas da Literatura (RSL)
ajudam a ilustrar o status quo de pesquisas cient?ficas sobre esses dois temas. Nesse sentido, a
ampla categoriza??o de pesquisas sobre DAG, obtida por interm?dio da RSL produziu uma
classifica??o em 7 dimens?es, provenientes do conceito de DAG e em 10 termos mais
abordados em artigos sobre DAG. Essa categoriza??o possibilita a indica??o de quais rumos
podem ser adotados em pesquisas futuras sobre DAG e quais temas j? foram vastamente
explorados, bem como poss?veis combina??es dentre eles. Os resultados da presente pesquisa
ampliam a abrang?ncia da Accountability Theory pelo enfoque ? responsabiliza??o de agentes
p?blicos, por interm?dio dos DAGs, pois a percep??o dos respondentes demonstra os aspectos
que ampliam a transpar?ncia para atender a esse prop?sito. A presente pesquisa tamb?m
demonstrou um novo m?todo para avalia??o de itens por entrevistados, durante entrevistas
semiestruturadas. Al?m disso, produziu um novo instrumento eletr?nico de coleta de dados a
ser utilizado em pesquisas futuras sobre amplia??o de transpar?ncia para portais de DAG,
com enfoque ? accountability. N?o obstante, a presente pesquisa conseguiu reunir e combinar
conceitos oriundos da ?rea de Seguran?a da Informa??o, com conceitos oriundos da ?rea de
Governo Aberto, junto a conceitos provenientes de estudos sobre a Transpar?ncia e conceitos
da Accountability Theory.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7724 |
| Date | 19 October 2017 |
| Creators | Klein, Rodrigo Hickmann |
| Contributors | Luciano, Edimara Mezzomo |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Administra??o e Neg?cios, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Neg?cios |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3244129067093836374, 500, 500, 500, 944455694546435801, 8024035432632778221 |
Page generated in 0.003 seconds