Thesis (MPhil (Journalism))--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / Bibliography / ENGLISH ABSTRACT:In a system of representative government, the media is assumed as an important institution to
reflect public concerns and holding government accountable for the way in which it addresses
these public concerns. Not only is this role imposed by a paradigm which views the media as one
of the institutions that sustain and consolidate liberal democracy – the so-called fourth estate
alongside the legislative, executive and judicial pillars – but the media itself has conceptualised
its identity around the notion that journalists are a “vital part of political life” (Sparks, 1991:58).
This study explores the validity of this authority. It suggests that the authority of the media to
frame public concerns in a way that is useful for ordinary citizens to “bridge the gap between
the private, domestic world and the concerns and activities of the wider society (McQuail,
2005:432)” has been eroded because citizens feel that their concerns and priorities have become
secondary to the priorities of powerful state, economic and other “experts” who determine the
news agenda. At the same time, there is a general sense that representative government or what
is generally known as liberal democracy is losing its currency because citizens have developed a
“habit of seeing the political system as indifferent and unresponsive” to their problems and their
circumstances (Mathews, 1999:33).
This study explores the potential of a more productive relationship between the media
and citizens to rekindle and energise the role of citizens to contribute to the public work of
solving common problems that face the wider society.
This study proposes three theoretical frameworks – democratic professionalism, public
journalism and deliberative democracy – with the potential to re-conceptualise the way
journalists consider their professional role. This re-conceptualisation raises the possibility for reassessing
the political work of journalists and the political work of citizens and build new habits
of participation and discussion in the political process of communities. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In 'n stelsel van verteenwoordigende regering, word die media veronderstel as 'n belangrike
instelling om publieke kwessies te weërspieël en die regering verantwoordelik te hou vir die
wyse waarop dit hierdie publieke kwessies aanspreek. Hierdie rol word veronderstel in 'n
denkraamwerk wat die media beskou as een van die instellings wat liberale demokrasie
konsolideer as die sogenaamde “vierde pilaar” neffens die wetgewende, uitvoerende en
geregtelike gesag. Die role word verder deur die media self gekonseptualiseer as ‘n identiteit
rondom die idee dat joernaliste 'n "belangrike deel is van die politieke lewe" (Sparks, 1991:58).
Hierdie studie ondersoek die geldigheid van hierdie gesag. Die studie dui daarop dat die
media gesag het wat die moontlikheid bied om publieke kwessies aan te spreek op 'n manier wat
van nut kan wees vir gewone burgers om die kloof tussen die private, huishoudelike wêreld en
die sorg en die aktiwiteite van die breër gemeenskap te oorbrug (McQuail, 2005:432). Die gesag
word ondermyn omdat gewone burgers voel hulle belange en prioriteite word sekondêr geag aan
die magsbelang van die staat en ander "kenners" wat die nuus agenda bepaal. Terselfdertyd is
daar 'n algemene persepsie dat verteenwoordigende die regering, of wat algemeen bekend staan
as liberale demokrasie, geldigheid verloor omdat burgers voel dat die politieke stelsel
onverskillig reageer op die probleme wat hulle ervaar.
Hierdie studie ondersoek die potensiaal van 'n meer werkbare verhouding tussen die
media en die burgery om die energie wat burgers in die openbare sfeer kan bydra te ontgin.
Hierdie studie stel drie teoretiese raamwerke voor – demokratiese professionaliteit,
openbare joernalistiek en beraadslagende demokrasie – wat moontlikhede bied om opnuut oor
die professionele rol van joernaliste te besin. Hierdie “besinning” bied weer nuwe moontlikhede
vir die politieke werk van joernaliste en die politieke werk van die burgery. Dit veronderstel
nuwe gewoontes van deelname en gesprek in openbare politieke proses.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:sun/oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/5195 |
| Date | 12 1900 |
| Creators | Oelofsen, Heiletha |
| Contributors | Ogada, J., University of Stellenbosch. Faculty Arts and Social Sciences. Department of Journalism. |
| Publisher | Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 78 p. |
| Rights | University of Stellenbosch |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds