This research determined the preferred project delivery method utilized by campus planners when building student housing on a university campus. Four key performance indicators were also evaluated to determine if they influenced the campus planner to select a particular project delivery method. The four key performance indicators were: owner input, cost, safety, and on-time completion. Campus planners identified though the Society for Campus and University Planners (SCUP), were invited to participate in this survey research method. Five research questions were explored in this study. They were:
1. What is the preferred project delivery method (PDM) when building a residence hall on a college campus?
2. Do key performance indicators influence a campus planner’s choice of preferred project delivery method?
3. Does the preferred project delivery method differ by the number of beds?
4. Does the preferred project delivery method differ geographically?
5. Does the preferred project delivery method differ between public and private institutions?
Based on the survey findings, analyzed using SPSS, sufficient information was garnered from the data to allow responses to the five research questions. In sum, there was a significant preference on the part of campus planners for the construction management at risk project delivery method when building student housing. This finding was consistent across regions and between public and private institutions. The design-bid-build project delivery method was the preferred approach when building student housing of less than 200 beds. Key performance indicators were shown to have little influence on the decision regarding which project delivery method to choose.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unf.edu/oai:digitalcommons.unf.edu:etd-1588 |
Date | 01 January 2015 |
Creators | Riel, Paul E |
Publisher | UNF Digital Commons |
Source Sets | University of North Florida |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | UNF Theses and Dissertations |
Page generated in 0.0013 seconds