Return to search

Limites e avan?os da gest?o social em territ?rios rurais: uma an?lise do Territ?rio da Borborema - PB

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-22T20:56:04Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
ValerioVerissimoDeSouzaBastos_TESE.pdf: 2246281 bytes, checksum: d192f38abdce77fa0f984a9e0614d8de (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-24T19:25:17Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
ValerioVerissimoDeSouzaBastos_TESE.pdf: 2246281 bytes, checksum: d192f38abdce77fa0f984a9e0614d8de (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-24T19:25:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ValerioVerissimoDeSouzaBastos_TESE.pdf: 2246281 bytes, checksum: d192f38abdce77fa0f984a9e0614d8de (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-05-29 / Este trabalho tem como objetivo analisar os limites e avan?os da gest?o social em territ?rios rurais, tendo como delimita??o o F?rum de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustent?vel da Borborema, no Estado da Para?ba. Nessa perspectiva, buscamos entender as rela??es de poder no processo de gest?o social do desenvolvimento territorial, ou seja, entender o processo e n?o somente o resultado. Metodologicamente optamos por desenvolver uma an?lise qualitativa com destaque para as pr?ticas, trajet?rias e rela??es estabelecidas pelos diversos atores no Territ?rio da Borborema. Focamos na compreens?o dos atores sobre o processo de gest?o social do colegiado do F?rum da Borborema. Como procedimento de coleta de dados, utilizamos a aplica??o de question?rios, realiza??o de entrevistas, observa??o direta tendo como m?todo de capta??o das informa??es a hist?ria oral. Para isso, analisamos o discurso e a pr?tica no processo de gest?o social no ?mbito do F?rum da Borborema. A partir dessa problem?tica, lan?amos a seguinte quest?o: como a concerta??o social, os pactos e as rela??es de poder entre os atores sociais inseridos no F?rum da Borborema t?m influenciado no processo de gest?o social deste territ?rio? Diante da observa??o, podemos confirmar a nossa ?ltima hip?tese que indicava que a gest?o social do Territ?rio da Borborema constitui-se como produto da concerta??o dos atores locais, sendo esta gest?o social condicionada tanto pelas pol?ticas p?blicas como pelas formas de organiza??o dos seus atores sociais, bem como com as suas rela??es de poder existentes no F?rum da Borborema, principalmente por estes atores serem portadores de estrat?gias internas de gest?o, garantindo com isso um modelo de gest?o social particular no ?mbito do territ?rio, gest?o social essa constru?da ao longo das ?ltimas d?cadas. Sendo assim, o processo de gest?o social do desenvolvimento territorial passou a ser influenciado n?o apenas pelos poderes e organiza??es que constituem o poder local e territorial, mas tamb?m por ambientes e pautas exteriores. Mudan?as sociais mobilizadas pelo capital social, arranjos institucionais e um sistema de gest?o social retroalimentado com agentes locais inseridos nesse processo. Existe uma tend?ncia decrescente quando se passa do campo das ideias (concep??es, representa??es, ideologias) para o campo da pr?tica, permanecendo um hiato entre as ideias planejadas e debatidas no F?rum da Borborema e o processo de coloca-las em pr?tica e acompanhar essas a??es. Por fim, os resultados indicam a necessidade de uma maior aten??o para a qualifica??o pr?tica dos membros do F?rum da Borborema, capacitando-os tecnicamente para uma iniciativa mais proativa do processo de gest?o social do desenvolvimento territorial, contemplando a perspectiva pr?tica do desenvolvimento com foco no fortalecimento das capacidades institucionais presentes do F?rum da Borborema. / The objective of this study is to analyze the limits and advances of social management in rural territories, based on the Borborema Sustainable Rural Development Forum in the State of Para?ba. From this perspective, we seek to understand the relations of power in the process of social management of territorial development, that is, to understand the process and not only the result. Methodologically we chose to develop a qualitative analysis with emphasis on the practices, trajectories and relationships established by the various actors in Borborema Territory. We focus on the actors' understanding of the social management process of the Borborema Forum. As a data collection procedure, we used the application of questionnaires, interviewing, direct observation using oral history as a method of capturing information. For this, we analyze the discourse and practice in the social management process within the Borborema Forum. From this problematic, we launch the following question: how the social agreement, the pacts and power relations between the social actors inserted in the Forum of Borborema have influenced in the process of social management of this territory? In view of the observation, we can confirm our last hypothesis which indicated that the social management of the Territory of Borborema constitutes as a product of the concertation of the local actors, being this social management conditioned by both public policies and the forms of organization of its social actors, As well as with their power relations existing in the Borborema Forum, mainly because these actors carry internal management strategies, thus guaranteeing a particular social management model within the territory, social management that has been built up over the last decades. Thus, the process of social management of territorial development began to be influenced not only by the powers and organizations that constitute local and territorial power, but also by external environments and guidelines. Social changes mobilized by social capital, institutional arrangements and a social management system feedback with local agents inserted in this process. There is a downward trend from the field of ideas (conceptions, representations, ideologies) to the field of practice, a gap between the ideas planned and debated in the Borborema Forum and the process of putting them into practice and accompanying these actions. Finally, the results indicate the need for greater attention to the practical qualification of the members of the Forum of Borborema, enabling them technically for a more proactive initiative of the social management process of territorial development, contemplating the practical perspective of development focused on the Institutional capacities of the Borborema Forum.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24365
Date29 May 2017
CreatorsBastos, Val?rio Ver?ssimo de Souza
Contributors85911283972, Rocha, Ana Georgina Peixoto, 47787368500, Locatel, Celso Donizete, 10282156810, Costa, Fernando Bastos, 02082330400, Caniello, M?rcio de Matos, 25623010130, Souza, Cimone Rozendo de
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM CI?NCIAS SOCIAIS, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0029 seconds