Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T14:56:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2009 - Rolf Bateman Hippertt Hatje.pdf: 3528082 bytes, checksum: 1d65844b53810b7f5d3f28e71613c11d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-09-13 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Although the creation of Conservation Units has been a widely used strategy by many
countries to contain the increasing threat to their biomes, it is already a consensus in the
literature that the mere definition of these areas through legal instruments is not enough to
assure its efficiency. To this end, many governmental agencies, civil society organizations
and research institutions have been constructing methodologies to make possible, not only the
diagnosis of the Conservation Units, but also the establishment and consolidation of these
practices. The development of criteria and indicators, and the creation of a methodology for
public environmental auditorship in Conservation Units (PEA in CUs) is part of this flood of
new attempts. The work centres on the necessity of generating conclusive and fast methods
that allow the managers, employees and members of the superior inspection agencies, to
identify the weaknesses and strengths, aiming at an efficient and continuously improvement
of the results. Two stages had been initially defined for the auditorship to take place. The first
one, with requirements coming from the pertinent legislation, called Public Environmental
Auditorship of Legal Agreement. The second one, built with indicators from the literature and
opinions, called Public Environmental Auditorship of Management Performance. After the
determination of the requirements in these two stages there were discussion groups and
interviews with professionals for evaluation of the indicators. The definitive spreadsheet has
integrated two pilot auditorships, in the Catacumba and Prainha Municipal Natural Parks -
Rio de Janeiro, RJ. The methodology was finalized with 54 requirements, amongst which 15
were selected for the pilot auditorship in Catacumba Park and 14 for Prainha Park. Totalizing
the two stages of the methodology application, the Catacumba Park added eight Major Nonagreements,
one Minor Non-Agreement and six Agreements. In Prainha, there were eight
Major Non-Agreement, one Minor Non-Agreement and four Agreement. The main product of
this dissertation, however, is the creation of the Guide with directrices for the development of
Environmental Auditorships in Conservation Units, consisting of criteria and indicators,
integrated and systematized in a methodology, so that the practices of auditorship in
Conservation Units can be applied by public workers assigned for this task. / Embora a cria??o de Unidades de Conserva??o venha sendo uma estrat?gia amplamente
utilizada por muitos pa?ses para conter a crescente amea?a aos seus biomas, j? se configura
ponto pac?fico na literatura que a mera defini??o destas ?reas por instrumentos legais n?o ?
suficiente para assegurar-lhes a efici?ncia. Para este fim, muitos ?rg?os governamentais,
organiza??es da sociedade civil e institui??es de pesquisa v?m construindo metodologias para
viabilizar, n?o apenas o diagn?stico das Unidades de Conserva??o, mas tamb?m o
estabelecimento e a consolida??o destas pr?ticas. O desenvolvimento de crit?rios e
indicadores, e a cria??o de uma metodologia para Auditoria Ambiental P?blica em Unidades
de Conserva??o (AAP em UCs) fazem parte desta tend?ncia de novas tentativas. O trabalho
foca na necessidade de se gerar m?todos r?pidos e conclusivos que permitam aos gestores,
funcion?rios e membros dos ?rg?os fiscalizadores superiores, identificarem fraquezas e
for?as, visando ? melhoria cont?nua e eficaz dos resultados. Inicialmente foram definidas duas
etapas nas quais a auditoria se desenvolveria. A primeira, com requisitos oriundos da
legisla??o pertinente, denominada Auditoria Ambiental P?blica de Conformidade Legal. A
segunda, constru?da com indicadores retirados da literatura e opini?es, chamada de Auditoria
Ambiental P?blica de Desempenho de Gest?o. Ap?s a determina??o dos requisitos nestas
duas etapas, realizados grupos de discuss?o e consultas a profissionais para avalia??o dos
indicadores. A planilha definitiva integrou duas auditorias-piloto, nos Parques Naturais
Municipais da Catacumba e da Prainha Rio de Janeiro, RJ. A metodologia foi finalizada
com 54 requisitos, dentre os quais foram selecionados 15 para a auditoria-piloto no Parque da
Catacumba e 14 para o Parque da Prainha. No total das duas etapas da aplica??o da
metodologia, o Parque da Catacumba somou oito N?o-Conformidades Maiores, uma N?o-
Conformidade Menor e seis Conformidades. Na Prainha, houve oito N?o-Conformidades
Maiores, uma N?o-Conformidade Menor e cinco Conformidades. O principal produto desta
disserta??o, no entanto, ? a cria??o do Manual para Auditoria Ambiental em Unidades de
Conserva??o, constitu?do por crit?rios e indicadores, inclu?dos e sistematizados numa
metodologia, para que se possam aplicar as pr?ticas de auditoria em Unidades de
Conserva??o por funcion?rios p?blicos designados para esta fun??o.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:tede/483 |
| Date | 13 September 2009 |
| Creators | Hatje, Rolf Bateman Hippertt |
| Contributors | Medeiros, Rodrigo Jesus de |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Curso de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Ambientais e Florestais, UFRRJ, Brasil, Ci?ncias Agr?rias |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.003 seconds