Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-09-19T20:31:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
GilceliaBatistaDeGois_TESE.pdf: 3078038 bytes, checksum: 61eb654cd99492f36485c0c4b4bb9a7e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-09-21T11:53:54Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
GilceliaBatistaDeGois_TESE.pdf: 3078038 bytes, checksum: 61eb654cd99492f36485c0c4b4bb9a7e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-21T11:53:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
GilceliaBatistaDeGois_TESE.pdf: 3078038 bytes, checksum: 61eb654cd99492f36485c0c4b4bb9a7e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-03-22 / A tese intitulada Programa de Assessoria T?cnica, Social e Ambiental (ATES): uma avalia??o de processo no RN (2004-2010) teve como objetivo norteador avaliar as estrat?gias de implementa??o do Programa ATES (2004-2010). Para a consecu??o do objetivo exposto, a base fundante foi o seguinte problema de pesquisa: existem diferen?as nas estrat?gias utilizadas pelas institui??es governamentais e n?o governamentais no processo de implanta??o do programa nos assentamentos rurais de reforma agr?ria? A hip?tese que subsidiou foi: o modelo de implementa??o do Programa ATES, realizado nos assentamentos rurais do RN pelas institui??es governamentais, ? do tipo top-down: o modelo das institui??es n?o governamentais ? do tipo bottom-up, considerando as estrat?gias utilizadas pelos agentes na implementa??o. O problema de pesquisa teve como g?nese as poss?veis diferen?as na implementa??o da ATES nos assentamentos: Moacir Lucena, em Apodi, Monte Alegre I, em Upanema, e Cabelo de Negro, em Mossor?. Dessa forma, para averiguar o que se prop?s inicialmente, utilizou-se como recurso metodol?gico a pesquisa bibliogr?fica do tipo explorat?ria, a pesquisa de campo nos assentamentos citados, configurando-se um estudo de caso m?ltiplo (uma vez que foram trabalhados tr?s assentamentos). Somaram-se a esses recursos os instrumentos para coletas de dados: entrevista com agentes extensionistas governamentais e n?o governamentais, e question?rios mistos com os benefici?rios do programa no per?odo citado. Recorreu-se concomitantemente a dois funcion?rios do INCRA, ?rg?o respons?vel por toda a organiza??o do programa no Rio Grande do Norte. A priori averiguou-se que o processo de implementa??o ? marcado pela descontinuidade, fragmenta??o e por a??es pontuais, interesses e ideologias, resultando em realidades bastante diferenciadas nos assentamentos estudados. Adicionam4r-se a esse aspecto as estrat?gias utilizadas, do tipo top-down, por parte dos agentes governamentais, e bottom-up, pelos agentes extensionistas das organiza??es n?o governamentais. Assim, o modus operandi, de acordo com o NEPP da UNICAMP (1999), consiste em escolhas, interesses, prefer?ncias, op??es e ideologias, impulsionando para uma implanta??o diferente de um mesmo programa, no mesmo per?odo (temporalidade). Isso resultou num hiato entre o que preconizou o programa avaliado e a realidade e cotidiano dos sujeitos pesquisados. / The thesis entitled Social and Environmental Technical Assistance Program (ATES): a process evaluation in RN (2004-2010) aimed to evaluate the implementation strategies of ATES Program (2004-2010). For achieving the exposed goal, the basis was the following research problem: there are differences in the strategies used by governmental and non-governmental organizations in the process of implementation of the program of rural settlements of agrarian reform? The hypothesis that supported the thesis was: the implementation model of ATES Program, conducted in rural settlements of RN by government institutions, is top-down; the model of non-governmental institutions is bottom-up, considering the strategies used by agents in implementation. The research problem had as genesis the possible differences in the implementation of ATES in the settlements: Moacir Lucena, in Apodi, Monte Alegre I, in Upanema, and Cabelo de Negro, in Mossor?. Thus, to investigate what was proposed initially, it was used as methodological resource the exploratory bibliographic research, the field research in the settlements mentioned, setting a multiple case study (since three settlements were surveyed). Were added to these features the tools for data collection: interviews with governmental and non-governmental extension agents, and mixed questionnaires with the beneficiaries of the program in the period mentioned. It was resorted concomitantly to two INCRA officials, the organ responsible for all organization of the program in Rio Grande do Norte. A priori it was found that the implementation process is characterized by discontinuity, fragmentation and by punctual actions, interests and ideologies, resulting in very different realities in the settlements studied. Are added to this aspect the strategies used, either top-down, by the government agents, and bottom-up, by extension agents of non-governmental organizations. Thus, the modus operandi, according to the NEPP of UNICAMP (1999) consists in choices, interests, preferences, options and ideologies, driving for a different implementation of a same program, in a same period (temporal). This resulted in a gap between what the program evaluated advocated and reality and everyday life of the subjects studied.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/23957 |
| Date | 22 March 2013 |
| Creators | G?is, Gilc?lia Batista de |
| Contributors | 05944538368, Souza, Cimone Rozendo de, 85911283972, Costa, Jo?o Bosco Ara?jo da, 49516671772, Matos Filho, Jo?o, 05001650410, Oliveira, Alan Martins de, 76131874468, Coelho, Maria Ivonete Soares, 28317947491, Souza, Lincoln Moraes de |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM CI?NCIAS SOCIAIS, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds