This study examines the science/policy interactions in global health science and technology governance. It focuses on the institutional design of organizations that sit at the interface of science and policy, conceptualizing them as Boundary Organizations (BOs). The analysis considers how the institutional design of BOs affect boundary-work. The study examines two case studies, UNESCO’s International Bioethics Committee and the WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization. The study examines the ways in which boundary-work is carried out and finds that the concept of a BO demonstrates an institutionalization of science/policy interactions and the analysis of these two cases show that there are different ways that boundary-work is practiced as a function of the design of BOs. / Doctorat en Sciences politiques et sociales / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ulb.ac.be/oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/249167 |
Date | 09 May 2017 |
Creators | Ahmed Hassim, Sameea |
Contributors | Marchetti, Raffaele, Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Olsson, Christian, Orsini, Amandine, Guidi, Mattia Dr |
Publisher | Universite Libre de Bruxelles, LUISS Guido Carli, Political Science, Political Science - PhD, Université libre de Bruxelles, Faculté de Philosophie et Sciences sociales - Sciences politiques et sociales, Bruxelles |
Source Sets | Université libre de Bruxelles |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, info:ulb-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, info:ulb-repo/semantics/openurl/vlink-dissertation |
Format | No full-text files |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds