Return to search

Reservoir and geomechanical coupled simulation of CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery

Coalbeds are an extremely complicated porous medium with characteristics of heterogeneity, dual porosity and stress sensitivity. In the past decades great achievements have been made to the simulation models of pressure depletion coalbed methane (CBM) recovery process and CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery process. However, some important mechanisms are still not or not properly included. Among them, the influence of geomechanics is probably the most important one. Because of its influence coalbed permeability, the key parameter for the success of recovery processes, changes drastically with alterations of in situ stresses and strains during these processes. In present reservoir simulators, the change of coalbed permeability is estimated with analytical models. Due to the assumptions and over simplifications analytical models have limitations or problems in application.

In this research to properly estimate the changes of permeability and porosity in the simulation of CO2 sequestration and ECBM recovery process, comprehensive permeability and porosity models have been developed with minimum assumptions and simulation methods established. Firstly, a set of continuum medium porosity and permeability coupling models is built up and a simulation procedure to apply these models in reservoir and geomechanical coupled simulations proposed. Using the models and simulation procedure a sensitivity study, mainly on the parameters related to coalbed permeability change and deformation, has been made for the CBM recovery process. Then based on the understanding, a set of discontinuum medium porosity and permeability coupling models is developed and a procedure to apply these models in reservoir and geomechanical coupled simulations presented. The new models are more comprehensive and adaptable, and can accommodate a wide range of coalbeds and in situ conditions. The proposed equivalent continuum deformation model for coal mass is validated by simulating a set of lab tests including a uniaxial compression test in vacuum and a CO2 swelling test under axial constraint in the longitudinal (vertical) direction. At last the discontinuum medium porosity and permeability coupling models and the simulation procedure are successfully applied to simulate part of a series of micro-pilot tests of ECBM and CO2 sequestration at Fenn Big Valley of Alberta, Canada. / Geotechnical Eengineering

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:AEU.10048/810
Date11 1900
CreatorsGu, Fagang
ContributorsChalaturnyk, Rick (Civil and Environmental Engineering), Chan, Dave H. (Civil and Environmental Engineering), Settari, Antonin(Tony) (Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, The University of Calgary), Chalaturnyk, Rick (Civil and Environmental Engineering), Nouri, Alireza (Civil and Environmental Engineering), Sacchi, Mauricio D. (Physics), Xu, Zhenghe (Chemical and Materials Engineering)
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Format2955022 bytes, application/pdf
RelationGu, F. and Chalaturnyk, R.J., 2005. Sensitivity Study of Coalbed Methane Production with Reservoir and Geomechanic Coupled simulation. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 44(10): 23-32., Gu, F. and Chalaturnyk, R.J., 2005. Analysis of Coalbed Methane Production by Reservoir and Geomechanical Coupled simulation, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 44(10): 33-42., Gu, F. and Chalaturnyk, R.J., 2006. Numerical Simulation of Stress and Strain due to Gas Sorption/Desorption and Their Effects on In situ Permeability of Coalbeds. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 45(10): 52-62., Gu, F. and Chalaturnyk, R.J., 2006. History Matching on Micro-Pilot Tests for ECBM and CO2 Sequestration with Geomechanical and Reservoir Coupled Simulation. The 2006 International Coalbed Methane Symposium. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA, paper 0618.

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds