Return to search

Seed Pool Dynamics of a Great Basin Sagebrush Community in the Context of Restoration

Restoration of Great Basin sagebrush communities is often attempted without understanding the potential impacts of either restoration treatments on the seed pool or the seed pool on restoration efforts. In addition, few studies have examined seed pools of the Great Basin and the role of vegetation in structuring seed pool communities. I evaluated soil seed pool dynamics of a Great Basin sagebrush community in a restoration context. In Chapter 1, I determined the relationship between the compositions of the seed pool and aboveground vegetation and the effect of shrubs (microhabitat effects) and perennial bunchgrass cover (community phase effects) on the seed pool community composition, seed density, and seed pool species richness. To evaluate the relationship between the two communities and the effects of microhabitat and community phase, the aboveground vegetation and the soil seed pools of different community phases and microhabitats were sampled prior to restoration. Similarity and distance metrics and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were used to asses the relationship between the two communities. NMDS and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine the effects of aboveground community phase and microhabitat on the seed pool community. Results suggest that the relationship between the aboveground vegetation and seed pool community compositions varied according to the organizational level used for vegetation. In addition, microhabitat and community phase did influence seed density but not species richness. I sought to evaluate the effects of restoration treatments on the seed pool community in Chapter 3. To assess the impacts of restoration treatments, the seed pool community before and after treatments was censused. NMDS of the seed pool community and ANOVA on dominant species of the seed pool were performed to determine treatment effects. Results from this research suggest seed pool community composition and seed density varied temporally and spatially. Tebuthiuron and Plateau may have altered community composition whereas prescribed burn affected seed density. This research is applicable for land managers by helping determine the most effective restoration treatment, which will include effects on the seed pool.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UTAHS/oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:etd-1546
Date01 May 2010
CreatorsPekas, Kristen M.
PublisherDigitalCommons@USU
Source SetsUtah State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
SourceAll Graduate Theses and Dissertations
RightsCopyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu).

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds