Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-08-02T13:38:03Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_SORAIA_LEMOS_DE_SIQUEIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 1770308 bytes, checksum: 4220afcfa71b4f29b7880a79649bc375 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-08-02T13:38:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_SORAIA_LEMOS_DE_SIQUEIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 1770308 bytes, checksum: 4220afcfa71b4f29b7880a79649bc375 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-02T13:39:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_SORAIA_LEMOS_DE_SIQUEIRA_COMPLETO.pdf: 1770308 bytes, checksum: 4220afcfa71b4f29b7880a79649bc375 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-08-29 / Hand hygiene is an important procedure in preventing peritoneal dialysis-related
infections. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two distinct techniques for
hand hygiene in reducing the number of colony-forming units in patients on peritoneal
dialysis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational study. Twenty-two patients
underwent two collections of microbiological flora from the hands in two different
instances: after hand washing with non-antimicrobial soap and water followed by
rubbing with 70% ethyl alcohol, gel presentation, after application of 70% ethyl alcohol,
presentation gel. Cultures were obtained by applying the fingers surface directly on
agar-blood plates. RESULTS: The comparison between groups showed a significant
difference (p <0.01) in colony-forming units in the right hands and left hands, mean
59.6 ? 43.1 in the group not antimicrobial soap and water, proved higher than in group
70% ethyl alcohol, presentation gel (31.8 ? 39.9). This difference is characterized by the
presence of colonies of Staphylococcus coagulase-negative, and this was predominant
in the seed crops. CONCLUSION: Hand rubbing with gel-alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of colonies recovered than the other methods. / INTRODU??O: A higieniza??o das m?os ? um importante procedimento para a
preven??o de infec??es relacionadas a di?lise peritoneal. OBJETIVO: comparar a
efic?cia de duas t?cnicas de higieniza??o das m?os, na redu??o do n?mero de unidades
formadoras de col?nia em pacientes em programa de di?lise peritoneal. MATERIAIS
E M?TODO: Estudo observacional, transversal. Vinte e dois indiv?duos submetidos a
duas coletas da flora microbiol?gica das m?os, em dois momentos distintos: ap?s
higieniza??o das m?os com ?gua e sab?o n?o antimicrobiano seguida de fric??o com
?lcool et?lico 70%, apresenta??o gel; ap?s aplica??o de ?lcool et?lico 70%, apresenta??o
gel. Culturas obtidas da superf?cie dos dedos das m?os, diretamente em placas de Agar
Sangue de Carneiro. RESULTADOS: A compara??o entre grupos mostrou uma
diferen?a significativa (p<0,01), nas unidades formadoras de col?nia nas m?os direitas e
m?os esquerdas, a m?dia 59,6?43,1 do grupo ?gua e sab?o n?o antimicrobiano;
mostrou-se mais elevada que no grupo ?lcool et?lico 70%, apresenta??o gel (31,8?39,9).
Esta diferen?a ? caracterizada pela presen?a de col?nias de Staphyloccocus coagulasenegativa,
sendo que este foi o germe prevalente nas culturas. CONCLUS?O: A higieniza??o com ?lcool et?lico 70%, apresenta??o gel produziu maior redu??o no n?mero de unidades formadoras de col?nia.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7599 |
| Date | 29 August 2012 |
| Creators | Siqueira, Soraia Lemos de |
| Contributors | D'Avila, Domingos Ot?vio Lorenzoni, Figueiredo, Ana Elizabeth Prado Lima |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Medicina e Ci?ncias da Sa?de, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Medicina |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 7620745074616285884, 500, 500, 500, -224747486637135387, -969369452308786627 |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds