The Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is a global health problem as it afflicts an estimated 170 million people worldwide and is the major cause of viral hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver cancer. HCV is a rapidly evolving virus, with 6 major genotypes and multiple subtypes. Over the past 20 years, HCV therapeutic efforts have focused on identifying the best-in-class direct acting antiviral (DAA) targeting crucial components of the viral lifecycle, The NS3/4A protease is responsible for processing the viral polyprotein, a crucial step in viral maturation, and for cleaving host factors involved in activating immunity. Thus targeting the NS3/4A constitutes a dual strategy of restoring the immune response and halting viral maturation. This high priority target has 4 FDA approved inhibitors as well as several others in clinical development. Unfortunately, the heterogeneity of the virus causes seriously therapeutic challenges, particularly the NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PIs), which suffer from both the rapid emergence of drug resistant mutants as well as a lack of pan-genotypic activity.
My thesis research focused on filling two critical gaps in our structural understanding of inhibitor binding modes. The first gap in knowledge is the molecular basis by which macrocyclization of PIs improves antiviral activity. Macrocycles are hydrophobic chains used to link neighboring chemical moieties within an inhibitor and create a structurally pre-organized ligand. In HCV PIs, macrocycle come in two forms: a P1 - P3 and P2 - P4 strategy. I investigated the structural and thermodynamic basis of the role of macrocyclization in reducing resistance susceptibility. For a rigorous comparison, we designed and synthesized both a P1 - P3 and a linear analog of grazoprevir, a P2 - P4 inhibitor. I found that, while the P2 - P4 strategy is more favorable for achieving potency, it does not allow the inhibitor sufficient flexibility to accommodate resistance mutations. On the other hand, the P1 - P3 strategy strikes a better balance between potency and resistance barrier.
The second gap my thesis addresses is elucidating the structural basis by which highly potent protease inhibitors function in genotype 1 but not in genotype 3, despite having an 87% sequence similarity. After mapping the amino acids responsible for this differential efficacy in genotypes 1 and 3, I engineered a 1a3a chimeric protease for crystallographic studies. My structural characterization of three PIs in complex with both the 1a3a and genotype 1 protease revealed that the loss of inhibitor efficacy in the 1a3a and GT-3 proteases is a consequence of disrupted electrostatic interactions between amino acids 168 and 155, which is critical for potent binding of quinoline and isoindoline based PIs. Here, I have revealed details of molecular and structural basis for the lack of PI efficacy against GT-3, which are needed for design of pan-genotypic inhibitors.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:umassmed.edu/oai:escholarship.umassmed.edu:gsbs_diss-1806 |
| Date | 15 December 2015 |
| Creators | Soumana, Djade I. |
| Publisher | eScholarship@UMassChan |
| Source Sets | University of Massachusetts Medical School |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Dissertations and Theses |
| Rights | Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds