Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:43:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
PryscylaPTA_DISSERT.pdf: 1471076 bytes, checksum: 63eee78ee148fad88e300caf30aa4256 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-12-19 / This study aimed to evaluate patients who underwent placement of zygomatic implants technique by Stella & Warner, considering the survival of conventional and zygomatic implants, sinus health and level of patient satisfaction in relation to oral rehabilitation. We evaluated 28 patients where 14 had received conventional and zygomatic implants, being rehabilitated with implant-fixed dentures (group 1) and 14 were rehabilitated only with conventional implants and implant-fixed dentures (group 2). The study had four phases, represented by radiographic evaluation of implants (stage I), clinical evaluation (stage II), assessing the health of the maxillary sinus (stage III) and a questionnaire to measure satisfaction of rehabilitation with fixed prosthesis implant Total -backed (stage IV). Group 2 underwent only stage IV, while group 1 participated in all stages. Descriptive analysis and statistics were performed, using the t test for independent samples in the evaluation of phase IV. The results demonstrated that the technique of Stella & Warner proved effective, allowing a high survival rate of conventional implants and zygomatic (100%), considering a minimum follow-up of 15 months and maximum 53 months after prosthetic rehabilitation. There were no pathological changes in tissues periimplants conventional and zygomatic implants analyzed. Radiographic findings showed satisfactory levels bone implants in the oral rehabilitation with conventional zygomatic implants and a good positioning of the apex of the zygomatic implants over the zygomatic bone. The presence of the zygomatic implant did not cause sinus and the t test showed a satisfaction index lower in group 1 compared with group 2. The zygomatic implant placement technique by Stella & Warner proved to be a predictable technique with high survival rate in patients with atrophic jaws, necessitating long-term follow-up to confirm the initial findings of the study / Este trabalho se prop?s a avaliar pacientes submetidos ? coloca??o de implantes zigom?ticos pela t?cnica de Stella & Warner, considerando a sobreviv?ncia dos implantes convencionais e zigom?ticos, a sa?de do seio maxilar e o n?vel de satisfa??o dos pacientes em rela??o ? reabilita??o oral. Foram avaliados 28 pacientes, onde 14 haviam recebido implantes zigom?ticos e convencionais, encontrando-se reabilitados com pr?teses totais fixas implantossuportadas (grupo 1) e 14 foram reabilitados somente com implantes convencionais e pr?teses totais fixas implantossuportadas (grupo 2). O estudo teve quatro fases, representadas pela avalia??o radiogr?fica dos implantes (fase I), avalia??o cl?nica (fase II), avalia??o da sa?de do seio maxilar (fase III) e aplica??o de um question?rio para mensurar a satisfa??o da reabilita??o com pr?tese fixa total implanto-suportada (fase IV). O grupo 2 s? foi submetido a fase IV, enquanto o grupo 1 participou de todas as etapas. Foram realizadas an?lises descritivas e estat?sticas, tendo, esta ?ltima, utilizado o test t para amostras independentes na avalia??o da fase IV. Os resultados demonstraram que a t?cnica de Stella & Warner mostrou-se efetiva, permitindo um elevado ?ndice de sobreviv?ncia dos implantes convencionais e zigom?ticos (100%), considerando um per?odo m?nimo de acompanhamento de 15 meses e m?ximo de 53 meses ap?s reabilita??o prot?tica. N?o foram encontradas altera??es patol?gicas nos tecidos periimplantares dos implantes convencionais e zigom?ticos analisados. Os achados radiogr?ficos mostraram n?veis ?sseos satisfat?rios nos implantes convencionais das reabilita??es orais com fixa??es zigom?ticas e um bom posicionamento do ?pice dos implantes zigom?ticos em rela??o ao osso zigom?tico. A presen?a do implante zigom?tico n?o provocou sinusopatias e o teste t demonstrou um ?ndice de satisfa??o inferior no grupo 1 quando comparado ao grupo 2. A coloca??o de implantes zigom?ticos pela t?cnica de Stella & Warner mostrou ser uma t?cnica previs?vel, com alto ?ndice de sobreviv?ncia em pacientes com maxilas atr?ficas, sendo necess?rio um acompanhamento por longo prazo para confirmar os achados iniciais desse estudo
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/17819 |
| Date | 19 December 2012 |
| Creators | Ara?jo, Pryscyla Pascally Targino |
| Contributors | CPF:91405963468, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9542712980723391, Silva, Jos? Sandro Pereira da, CPF:59241144653, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7625795408417124, Sardinha, Sandra de C?ssia Santana, CPF:49750461568, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9843567165328382, Germano, Adriano Rocha |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Sa?de Coletiva, UFRN, BR, Sa?de P?blica |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0089 seconds