As we think about sound and its many competing meanings and uses for musicians over the past hundred years, it is worth keeping in mind that defining sound was also a contentious problem in earlier times. Indeed, since the ancient Greeks first invoked the term psophos as a general concept for sound, there has been a persistent question of how to draw boundaries between musical sounds (covered by such sub-terms as phthongos and phoné) and more general notions of noise (klázō). The Latin term sonus was perhaps even more confusing in this regard, with a numbing variety of meanings and applications that cannot be easily reconciled. Still, one persistent demarcation that we can find in the history of the term’s usage is that between sound as an acoustical (»external«) object, and sound as a perceptible (»internal«) phenomenon. Each of these usages implies a distinctly differing aesthetic stance towards sound that has telling resonance for compositional and analytical issues that are still very much alive today. Indeed, an acoustical turn in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries prompted music theorists to confront the perception of musical sounds more thoroughly than before as exemplified by Johann Mattheson’s little known treatise Versuch einer systematischen Klang-Lehre (1748).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:87412 |
| Date | 12 October 2023 |
| Creators | Christensen, Thomas |
| Contributors | Universität für Musik und darstellende Kunst |
| Publisher | PFAU-Verlag |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:bookPart, info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 04, urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-854215, qucosa:85421 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds