建設公司為典型的內需產業，隨著國內經濟的發展而變動。在民國80年後房地產市場因經濟與政治的動盪而一路下滑，陷入長期的衰退時期，因此政府採取許多利多措施以振作該產業的發展，而土地增值稅減半徵收政策就是其中一項振興措施。土地增值稅減半措施可以降低土地的交易成本，被房地產市場認為是利多消息，而國內研究多從投資人的觀點探討政策對股價的影響，未曾探討該政策對身為房地產市場供給者之建設公司經營效率的影響程度。
因此，本研究針對1998年至2003年的36家上市櫃建設公司，採用資料包絡分析法與大邊界法的概念，畫出單一包絡曲線以涵蓋整體樣本期間，求出所有樣本的效率值並分析其長期趨勢，以探討減半徵收政策對建設公司成本效率、配置效率與技術效率的影響。
實證結果顯示，政策實施後之純技術效率顯著大於政策實施後，而政策實施後之規模效率則顯著小於政策實施前；以Tobit迴歸分析顯示，政策實施對建設公司整體而言有提升配置效率與純技術效率的效果，但規模效率是下降的，表示建設公司尚未達到最適生產規模，仍有調整提振的空間。另外，就不同組織型態下的建設公司探討政策對其影響程度，若就上櫃建設公司與上市建設公司兩個子群體分別觀察，分析結果發現上櫃建設公司在政策實施前與實施後之成本效率、整體技術效率、純技術效率與規模效率皆顯著大於上市建設公司，且政策實施對上市建設公司之純技術效率有大幅度提升的效果，而Tobit迴歸分析亦顯示上櫃建設公司之經營效率較上市建設公司為佳。從有無集團背景著眼分析顯示非屬於集團企業之建設公司在政策實施前與實施後之成本效率、整體技術效率與純技術效率皆顯著大於屬於集團企業之建設公司，而Tobit迴歸分析亦顯示屬於集團企業之建設公司在整體技術效率方面不如非屬於集團企業之建設公司。 / Developers as the typical domestic demand industry change with development of the domestic economy. Because of turbulence of the economy and politics the real estate market fell into long-term decline after 1990. So the government took many favorite policies to improve the development of this industry, and the Land Value Increment Tax (LVIT) cut was one of those policies. The LVIT cut could reduce the transaction cost of the land, so it was thought a profitable policy to the real estate market. Most domestic researches are based on the investors’ view to test the impact of the policy on stock market, but not focus on the influence on the suppliers of real estate market, developers.
In order to trace the trend of developers’ efficiency, this research employs data of 36 listed developers from 1998 to 2003 and applies Date Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to construct a grand frontier. Therefore, based on the trend of grand frontier this research could examine the impact of LIVT cut on developers` cost efficiency, allocation efficiency and technical efficiency. The major findings of this research as follows.
The statistical results show that pure technical efficiency after the policy is statistically significant greater than that before the policy, and scale efficiency before the policy is statistically significant greater than that after the policy. The Tobit regression suggests that the implement of the LIVT cut could improve pure technical efficiency and allocation efficiency but drop scale efficiency. The finding suggests that developers have not yet reached the best scale and still have adjustment space. In addition, this research examines the impact of the policy on developers under different organization type. First, to divide developers into TSE and OTC. The analysis result shows that whether before the policy or after the policy cost efficiency, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of OTC are statistically significant greater than that of TSE, and Tobit regression also shows that business efficiency of OTC is greater than that of TSE. Besides, from views of group background, the analysis result shows that whether before the policy or after the policy cost efficiency, technical efficiency, and pure technical efficiency of independent developers are statistically significant greater than that of group developers, and Tobit regression shows that technical efficiency of independent developers is statistically significant greater than that of group developers.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0923530491 |
| Creators | 鄭惠嘉, Cheng, Hui-Chia |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds