Return to search

Avalia??o n?o invasiva da taxa m?xima de relaxamento dos m?sculos inspirat?rios na distrofia miot?nica

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-03T20:58:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-09T14:10:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-09T14:10:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-06-17 / INTRODU??O: A Distrofia Miotonica ? caracterizada por atrofia, fraqueza presen?a de miotonia nos m?sculos esquel?ticos. A presen?a de miotonia nos musculos respirat?rios ? duvidosa assim como as t?cnicas para avalia-l?s. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a sensibilidade /especificidade da taxa m?xima de relaxamento dos m?sculos inspirat?rios (MRR), a eletromiografia de superf?cie (EMGs) dos m?sculos esternocleidomast?ideo (SCM), escaleno (ESC), paraesternal (2EIC), reto abdominal (RA) e a fun??o pulmonar/muscular respiratoria em pacientes com DM1 e sujeitos saudaveis. M?TODOS: Foram convidados a participar do estudo, 71 indiv?duos, 44 pacientes com DM1 e 27 controles. Foram inclu?dos no estudo 28 sujeitos, (18 DM1 e 10 controles). Ap?s exlcus?es a amostra final foi de 25 sujeitos, 16 pacientes com DM1 e 9 sujeitos saud?veis. Todos foram avaliados em rela??o MRR dos m?sculos inspirat?rios, (dP/dt)/Psniff*100(%10ms), a EMGs dos m?sculos respirat?rios, ? fun??o muscular e pulmonar. RESULTADOS: A MRR foi menor nos pacientes com DM1 vs. controle (p=0,003) e foi considerada sens?vel e espec?fica para identificar a doen?a na DM1 e descart?-la no grupo controle, ?rea de ROC 0,87 (95%IC, 0,729 a 1,01, p=0,003). Foi observado valores reduzidos de PIm?x (p=0,0029), PEm?x (p=0,0007) e SNIP (p=0,0030), CVF%pred. (p=0,0014) e VEF1%pred. (p=0,0003) e maior atividade da EMGs em repouso nos m?sculos SCM (p=0,004), ESC (p=0,009) e RA (p=0,045) e no m?sculo SCM (p=0,001) durante o sniff teste. CONCLUS?ES: A MRR ? sensivel e especifica para identificar atraso no relaxamento dos musculos respirat?rios e a fun??o muscular respirat?ria encontra-se alterada nos pacientes com DM1. / INTRODUCTION: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by unstable expansion of CTG triplet on chromosome 19. It has two forms: type 1 (DM1 or Steinert's disease); and type 2 (DM2), being the former the most frequent and showing systemic manifestations, such as myotonia (muscle relaxation difficulty), cataracts, arrhythmias, muscle weakness and atrophy, among others, respiratory failure being one of the main factors predictive of mortality and a leading cause of death. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity / specificity of the maximum relaxation rate of the inspiratory muscles (MRR), the surface electromyography (sEMG) of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCA), parasternal (2ICS), rectus abdominis (RA) and lung function/respiratory muscle strength in patients with DM1 and healthy subjects. METHODS: We invited 74 subjects to participate in the study, 44 patients with DM1 and 30 controls. The study included 31 subjects (18 DM1 and 13 controls). After exclusions, the final sample was of 27 subjects, 16 patients with DM1 and 11 healthy subjects. All of them were assessed for MRR of inspiratory muscles, for sEMG of the respiratory muscles, muscle and lung function. RESULTS: The MRR was lower in patients with DM1 vs. control (p = 0.001) and was considered sensitive and specific to identify the disease in DM1 and discard it in the control group, ROC area of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.01, p=0.001). DM1 group showed lower PImax (p=0.0006), PEmax (p=0.0002), SNIP (p=0.0014), CVF%pred (p=0.0018) and FEV1%pred. (p=0.0004) and higher sEMG activity of the SCM (p=0.0022) and ESC muscles (p=0.004) at rest; of 2EIC (p=0.003) during PEmax and of SCM (p=0.02) and ESC muscles (p= 0.03) during the sniff test. CONCLUSIONS: The MRR is sensitive and specific to identify delayed relaxation of the respiratory muscles and respiratory muscle function is altered in patients with DM1.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21594
Date17 June 2015
CreatorsEvangelista, Morgana de Ara?jo
Contributors02357307935, http://lattes.cnpq.br/2201375154363914, Dourado J?nior, Mario Emilio Teixeira, 43835872400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3301569457373213, Britto, Raquel Rodrigues, 50011219653, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1002191640217585, Fregonezi, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM FISIOTERAPIA, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.002 seconds