Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-03T20:58:46Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-09T14:10:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-09T14:10:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MorganaDeAraujoEvangelista_DISSERT.pdf: 2607941 bytes, checksum: 7cff1386828e64e1f63b7ce32b375bb0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-06-17 / INTRODU??O: A Distrofia Miotonica ? caracterizada por atrofia, fraqueza presen?a de miotonia nos m?sculos esquel?ticos. A presen?a de miotonia nos musculos respirat?rios ? duvidosa assim como as t?cnicas para avalia-l?s. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a sensibilidade /especificidade da taxa m?xima de relaxamento dos m?sculos inspirat?rios (MRR), a eletromiografia de superf?cie (EMGs) dos m?sculos esternocleidomast?ideo (SCM), escaleno (ESC), paraesternal (2EIC), reto abdominal (RA) e a fun??o pulmonar/muscular respiratoria em pacientes com DM1 e sujeitos saudaveis. M?TODOS: Foram convidados a participar do estudo, 71 indiv?duos, 44 pacientes com DM1 e 27 controles. Foram inclu?dos no estudo 28 sujeitos, (18 DM1 e 10 controles). Ap?s exlcus?es a amostra final foi de 25 sujeitos, 16 pacientes com DM1 e 9 sujeitos saud?veis. Todos foram avaliados em rela??o MRR dos m?sculos inspirat?rios, (dP/dt)/Psniff*100(%10ms), a EMGs dos m?sculos respirat?rios, ? fun??o muscular e pulmonar. RESULTADOS: A MRR foi menor nos pacientes com DM1 vs. controle (p=0,003) e foi considerada sens?vel e espec?fica para identificar a doen?a na DM1 e descart?-la no grupo controle, ?rea de ROC 0,87 (95%IC, 0,729 a 1,01, p=0,003). Foi observado valores reduzidos de PIm?x (p=0,0029), PEm?x (p=0,0007) e SNIP (p=0,0030), CVF%pred. (p=0,0014) e VEF1%pred. (p=0,0003) e maior atividade da EMGs em repouso nos m?sculos SCM (p=0,004), ESC (p=0,009) e RA (p=0,045) e no m?sculo SCM (p=0,001) durante o sniff teste. CONCLUS?ES: A MRR ? sensivel e especifica para identificar atraso no relaxamento dos musculos respirat?rios e a fun??o muscular respirat?ria encontra-se alterada nos pacientes com DM1. / INTRODUCTION: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by unstable expansion of CTG triplet on chromosome 19. It has two forms: type 1 (DM1 or Steinert's disease); and type 2 (DM2), being the former the most frequent and showing systemic manifestations, such as myotonia (muscle relaxation difficulty), cataracts, arrhythmias, muscle weakness and atrophy, among others, respiratory failure being one of the main factors predictive of mortality and a leading cause of death. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity / specificity of the maximum relaxation rate of the inspiratory muscles (MRR), the surface electromyography (sEMG) of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCA), parasternal (2ICS), rectus abdominis (RA) and lung function/respiratory muscle strength in patients with DM1 and healthy subjects. METHODS: We invited 74 subjects to participate in the study, 44 patients with DM1 and 30 controls. The study included 31 subjects (18 DM1 and 13 controls). After exclusions, the final sample was of 27 subjects, 16 patients with DM1 and 11 healthy subjects. All of them were assessed for MRR of inspiratory muscles, for sEMG of the respiratory muscles, muscle and lung function. RESULTS: The MRR was lower in patients with DM1 vs. control (p = 0.001) and was considered sensitive and specific to identify the disease in DM1 and discard it in the control group, ROC area of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.01, p=0.001). DM1 group showed lower PImax (p=0.0006), PEmax (p=0.0002), SNIP (p=0.0014), CVF%pred (p=0.0018) and FEV1%pred. (p=0.0004) and higher sEMG activity of the SCM (p=0.0022) and ESC muscles (p=0.004) at rest; of 2EIC (p=0.003) during PEmax and of SCM (p=0.02) and ESC muscles (p= 0.03) during the sniff test. CONCLUSIONS: The MRR is sensitive and specific to identify delayed relaxation of the respiratory muscles and respiratory muscle function is altered in patients with DM1.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:16:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandaG_DISSERT.pdf: 1166474 bytes, checksum: 42a23625c719bb1096b1c812ac17e8f4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-05-18 / The clinical importance of evaluating the respiratory muscles with a variety of tests has been proposed by several studies, once that the combination of several tests would allow a better diagnosis and therefore, a better clinical follow of disorders of the respiratory muscles. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of adapting a national electronic manovacuometer to measure the nasal inspiratory pressure (study 1) and analyze the level of load intensity of maximum voluntary ventilation, as well as the variables that may influence this maneuver in healthy subjects (study 2). We studied 20 healthy subjects by a random evaluation of two measures of SNIP in different equipments: a national and an imported. In study 2 it was analyzed the intensity of the load of MVV test, change in pressure developed during the maneuver, the possible differences between genders, and the correlations between the flow developed in the test and the result of MVV. In study 1 it was found the average for both measures of nasal inspiratory pressures: 125 ? 42.4 cmH2O for the imported equipment and 131.7 ? 28.7 cmH2O for the national one. Pearson analysis showed a significant correlation between the average, with a coefficient r = 0.63. The average values showed no significant differences evaluated by paired t test (p> 0.05). In the Bland-Altman analysis it was found a BIAS = 7 cmH2O, SD 32.9 and a confidence interval of - 57.5 cmH2O up to 71.5 cmH2O. In the second study it was found significant differences between the genders in the air volume moved, being higher in males 150.9 ? 13.1 l / min vs 118.5 ? 15.7 L / min for (p = 0.0002, 95% CI 44.85 to 20:05). Regarding the inspiratory and expiratory loading, they were significantly higher in men than in women, peak inspiratory pressure (34.7 ? 5.3 cmH2O vs 19.5 ? 4.2 cmH2O, 95% CI - 18.0 to -12.3, p <0.0001), peak expiratory (33.8 vs. 23.1 ? 5.9 cmH2O ? 5.4 cmH2O, 95% CI -17.1 to - 4.6, p <0.0001), and the delta pressure (59.7 ? 10 cmH2O vs 36.8 ? 8.3 cmH2O, 95% CI 14.5 to 31.2, p <0.0002). The Pearson correlation showed that the flow generated by the maneuver is strongly correlated with the delta-expiratory pressure / inspiratory (r2= 0.83,R = 0.91, 95%IC 0.72 a 0.97 e p< 0.0001).Through these results we suggest that the national electronic manovacuometer is feasible and safe to perform the sniff test in healthy subjects. For the MVV, there are differences between the genders in the intensity of pressure developed during the maneuver. We found a load intensity considered low during the MVV, and found a strong correlation between the flow generated in the test and the delta pressure expiratory / inspiratory / A import?ncia clinica de avaliar os m?sculos respirat?rios com uma variedade de testes vem sendo proposta por diversos trabalhos, pois a combina??o de v?rios testes possibilitaria um melhor diagn?stico e consequentemente um melhor seguimento cl?nico das disfun??es dos m?sculos respirat?rios. Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a viabilidade da adapta??o do manovacu?metro nacional eletr?nico para a realiza??o da medida de press?o inspirat?ria nasal (estudo 1) e analisar o n?vel de intensidade de carga da ventila??o volunt?ria m?xima, assim como as vari?veis que possam influenciar a manobra em sujeitos saud?veis (estudo 2). Foram estudados 20 sujeitos saud?veis atrav?s da avalia??o aleat?ria de duas medidas de SNIP em equipamentos diferentes: um nacional e outro importado. No estudo 2 foi analisado a intensidade da carga do teste da ventila??o volunt?ria m?xima(VVM), a varia??o de press?o desenvolvida durante manobra, as poss?veis diferen?as entre g?neros, e as correla??es entre o fluxo desenvolvido no teste e o resultado da VVM. No estudo 1 as m?dias encontradas durante as duas medidas das press?es nasais foram de 125 ? 42,4 cmH2O para o aparelho importado e de 131,7 ? 28,7 cmH2O para o nacional. A an?lise de Pearson demonstrou uma correla??o significativa entre as m?dias com um coeficiente r=0.63. Os valores m?dios n?o apresentaram diferen?as significativas avaliadas pelo teste t pareado (p>0,05).Na an?lise de Bland-Altman foi encontrado um BIAS igual a 7 cmH2O, desvio padr?o 32,9 e um intervalo de confian?a de - 57,5cmH2O at? 71,5 cmH2O. No estudo 2 foi encontrada diferen?a significativa entre os g?neros para o volume de ar deslocado maior em homens 150.9 ? 13.1 l/mim vs 118.5 ? 15.7 L/mim para (p= 0.0002, IC95% 20.05 ? 44.85). Em rela??o carga inspirat?ria e expirat?ria foram significativamente maiores em homens que nas mulheres: pico inspirat?rio (34.7 ? 5.3 cmH2O vs 19.5 ? 4.2 cmH2O, IC95% - 18.0 a -12.3, p< 0.0001), pico expirat?rio (33.8 ? 5.9 cmH2O vs 23.1 ? 5.4 cmH2O, IC95% -17.1 a - 4.6, p< 0.0001), assim como o delta de press?o (59.7 ? 10 cmH2O vs 36.8 ? 8.3 cmH2O, IC95% 14.5 a 31.2 , p< 0.0002). A correla??o de Pearson mostrou que o fluxo gerado pela manobra est? fortemente correlacionado com o delta de press?o expirat?ria/inspirat?ria (r2= 0.83,R = 0.91, (95%IC 0.72 a 0.97 e p< 0.0001). Atrav?s dos resultados encontrados podemos sugerir que o manovacu?metro eletr?nico nacional ? vi?vel e seguro para realiza??o do sniff teste em sujeitos saud?veis. Em rela??o a VVM, existem diferen?as entre os g?neros na intensidade de press?o desenvolvida durante a VVM, a uma intensidade de carga durante a VVM foi considerada baixa assim como foi encontrada uma forte correla??o entre o fluxo gerado no teste e o delta de press?o expirat?rio/inspirat?rio