Since its beginnings in the 1970s disability activist movement, disability studiesscholarship has traditionally focused on physical disability and, in working to deconstruct
the figure of the “cripple” as a symbol of pathos, has shied away from close examinations
of pain, suffering, and dependency in favor of a focus on disability pride, agency, and
community. As the field has grown, however, it has made room for investigations into
these more difficult considerations, and in particular into how these affective states
cluster around mind-related disability. Feminist philosopher Eva Kittay’s 1999 book,
Love’s Labor, reexamines social contract theory in terms of what she calls the
“dependency relation” and its attendant ethics of care. Bringing together mental disability
with an analysis of both gender and race, Kittay’s work undergirds my own project’s
intervention into readings of American literature between the Civil War and World War
II, along with recent debates (for example, in the work of Licia Carlson, Nirmala
Erevelles, Rachel Adams, among others) about the gendered, raced, and classed
structures of care and dependency that are particularly evident in the case of mind-related
disability.
With a few notable recent exceptions, scholarship into the history of psychiatry
has largely ignored the early and sustained imbrication of race in the origins of the
American asylum movement and its widespread — and long-lasting — cultural impact.
My project seeks to intervene into this history by examining the works of American
writers who deploy representations of dependency and mind-related disability, and, in so
doing, also critique, and sometimes reinscribe, assumptions of racial and gendered
Otherness. I argue that mind-related disability produces strong cultural anxiety reflected
in these writings precisely because it threatens the illusion of raced-and-gendered
autonomy, an American ideal that has never been possible but has loomed large since the
earliest days of the republic.
Working from Ato Quayson’s insight that attention to disability, like the sublime,
activates aesthetic instability in the structures of representation and an ethical core in
literary interpretation, I offer textual readings that show that dependency, coded as
weakness and vulnerability, was conceived as a condition categorically apart from white male-independence, coded as strength and autonomy. As such, the focus on independence
as the organizing principle of a just society — rather than on distributed responsibility
and nonhierarchical interdependence — easily survived the shift from antebellum
sentimental protection to modernist scientific persecution.
Focusing my inquiry on dependency and care, in my second chapter, “The Mad
History of Asylums and Abolition,” I show how the early asylum movement and
abolitionists produced and responded to oppressive rhetorics of race and madness that
could be generative for resistance nonetheless. To that end, I examine the writing of
asylum-movement reformer Dorothea Dix, in which we see the strained attempt to
advocate for insanity as a specifically white condition that was tied to the vigor of
civilization and progress. I then turn to the writing of abolitionist and social reformer
Frederick Douglass, who sought to establish the capacity of black Americans to suffer
mental anguish or “madness” under slavery and yet also to invert mainstream rhetoric
such that madness adhered not to the abolitionist but to the slaveholding society of which
he was critical.
In my third chapter, “The Traumas and Delusions of the Civil War,” I reveal the
mutual dependency of race and mind-related disability in representations of the Civil War
and its traumas. Mind-related disability, instantiated in the individual body, becomes a
potent metaphor for the social trauma of the war and the trauma of slavery, both of which
are repressed in the post-Reconstruction narratives of white national fraternal healing. I
focus specifically on the sentimental novella, For the Major, by Constance Fenimore
Woolson, and on the genre-bending work, Specimen Days, by Walt Whitman, to show
how otherwise promising models of care are profoundly compromised by their erasures
of race and/or mind-related disability.
In my fourth chapter, “The Medical Gothic: The Medical Gaze and Monstrous
Care,” I show how after the war, the consolidation and assertion of medical authority
produced a medical gaze defined by empiricism and scientific objectivity, a gaze that was
critiqued by several late nineteenth-century writers by figuring the monstrous results of
such medical care. I examine the doctor-patient relationship at the heart of Charlotte
Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” and the ethical medical dilemma at the center
of Stephen Crane’s novella, The Monster, to analyze the harmful care that produces
social death under asymmetrical conditions of power.
Despite these critiques of medical authority, the degeneration theories of the finde-siecle and the shift towards biological determinism engendered the rise of eugenics
and an especially virulent abjection of mind-related disability. In this context, my fifth
chapter, “Eugenic Time, Eugenic Death,” examines how community care could not help
but fail and survival itself emerges as a kind of violence, as Charles Chesnutt’s story,
“Dave’s Neckliss,” and Mary Wilkins Freeman’s story “Old Woman Magoun,” confirm.
Throughout the dissertation, I show how the fantasy of American autonomy and
rationality relies on racial and gendered hierarchies to sustain it, with often brutal
consequences in the care of the dependent mentally ill/disabled. / English
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TEMPLE/oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/6846 |
| Date | January 2021 |
| Creators | White Vidarte, Elizabeth Justine |
| Contributors | Orvell, Miles, Henry, Katherine, 1956-, Walters, Shannon, Lyon, Janet |
| Publisher | Temple University. Libraries |
| Source Sets | Temple University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation, Text |
| Format | 250 pages |
| Rights | IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available., http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
| Relation | http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6828, Theses and Dissertations |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds